My Granny COMPLETED Family History Local History

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Monday 13 October 08 06:50 BST (UK)

News: Ad: Click for a 14 Day FREE trial with Ancestry.co.uk What could you find in 14 days?

RootsChat.Com

General

Photograph Restoration & Dating. Conservation (Moderators: deadants, PrueM)

My Granny COMPLETED

« previous next »

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author

Topic: My Granny COMPLETED (Read 896 times)

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 11 March 06 13:23 GMT (UK) »

The dpi on my scanner goes up to 19200 - will that be too big?

Anna x


	Logged

McLeods - Hartlepool, Liverpool, Inverness(?)
Simpsons - Carlisle, Westmorland
Harris - Carlisle, Kent
Reads - Birmingham and Staffordshire
Allens - Marylebone London
Zych - Poland
Holmes - Bawdsey, Suffolk
Perks - Hampshire
McQueen - Carlisle
Carrick - Carlisle
Haugh - Carlisle
Irving - Irving
Collett - Bredon, Worcester
Harrison - Carlisle
Knight - Carlisle
Thompson - Carlisle
Johnstone - Carlisle
Rogerson - Dumfries and Carlisle
Wood - Ontario

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #16 on: Saturday 11 March 06 13:31 GMT (UK) »

I have done it at 1200 dpi and it is 390kb and at 4800 dpi it is 2.51 MB

Is it better to enlarge the smaller one or shrink the bigger one?

Anna x

PS Thank you for all your patience with me over this - I have only had the scanner since Jan and I still dont know what it does really!


	Logged

dennford
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 2073

just resting for a while

Re: My Granny
« Reply #17 on: Saturday 11 March 06 13:48 GMT (UK) »

try the 1200, I would imagine that the higher res' could possibly be interpolated, either way the 1200 would be as big a manification as the pic' can go.
Denn


	Logged

Ford, Baines, Dixon, Platts, Peat, Proctor, Rotherforth, Dakin/Daykin, Sales, Beech, Hall, Parkin, Nightingale. ----- Harthill, Waleswood, Woodhouse-mill, Whitwell

South Yorkshire/Derbyshire/Nottinghamshire

Torremocha, Candog, Ramos, Reyes, Rodrigueus
-------Philippines --- Bohol

BertieH
RootsChat Extra

Offline

Posts: 80

Lost but not fogotten

Re: My Granny
« Reply #18 on: Saturday 11 March 06 13:50 GMT (UK) »

Hi Anna

Bigger is always best! Use the 2.51 mb one.

The bigger the original scan the more you can enlarge it - just ensure that you trade resolution for 'physical' size. ie increase height/width while reducing resolution.

People often make the mistake of simply forcing up the file size to make a picture bigger, but they are simply stretching the pixels and so effectively reduce the quality.

When saving as a JPEG, try not to use a low quality setting to make a file smaller, as this is achieved by throwing away information - wasting all the effort made in the scanning process.

Oh, and always scan in colour (RGB) even for black and white pics. Again, this will contain more digital info to play with.

Have fun Grin

Bob


	Logged

Hutchinson: Lancashire, Yorkshire, Norfolk, India (Lucknow)
Hughes: Wales(!), Manchester/Lancashire, USA (Delaware & Pennsylvania)
Briant/Bryant: Oxfordshire, Berkshire, Surrey, Devon?
Squire: Devon

All Census Look ups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:03 GMT (UK) »

This is the picture at 1200 dpi.
Scanned in colour and at 390 KB

Anna x

1200_dpi.jpg (390.78 KB, 1000x1168 - viewed 81 times.)
	Logged

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:07 GMT (UK) »

This is the 4200 dpi scanned in colour and shrunk to 465 KB

4800_dpi.jpg (465.52 KB, 756x883 - viewed 75 times.)
	Logged

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #21 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:08 GMT (UK) »

Why is the second picture smaller in size than the first but bigger KB?

Please be gentle with me if this is a stupid question

Anna x

PS Am I meant to see the difference in the pictures with their different dpi cos I dont!

PPS I really do thank you both for all your information and support here - I am learning I promise!


	Logged

tomkin
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 2386

Re: My Granny
« Reply #22 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:17 GMT (UK) »

Hi Anna,
Sorry, didn't notice there was a page 2.
Anyway here's another.
Tomkin

indexMy_Grannyfixx.jpg (156.31 KB, 650x696 - viewed 66 times.)
	Logged

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #23 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:21 GMT (UK) »

That is great Tomkin - I really like the way you have brought out her features - with the originall so faded I wondered whether I would ever see her again.

Anna x

PS There is only a page 2 as I am a ninny and dont know my dpi from mfi and my KB from my KM!!!!


	Logged

BertieH
RootsChat Extra

Offline

Posts: 80

Lost but not fogotten

Re: My Granny
« Reply #24 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:29 GMT (UK) »

What a great word 'ninny' is Wink

. Haven't heard it for years Grin

Without going around in technical circles, either scan will be fine to work with. As long as you've managed to take a tiny picture and make a decent size scan from it you're on the right road!

I don't have time at the moment, but if no-one else does it, I'll have another go later.

Bob


	Logged

tomkin
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 2386

Re: My Granny
« Reply #25 on: Saturday 11 March 06 14:39 GMT (UK) »

Hi Anna,
That makes two of us. I'm still on
Bushels and Pecks. I missed pge2 because I've left my websites on
large font and I'm too idle to change it. i.e. one click with a mouse
button, how idle is that.
Tomkin


	Logged

tomkin
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 2386

Re: My Granny
« Reply #26 on: Saturday 11 March 06 15:34 GMT (UK) »

Hi Anna,
Had to try a little experiment. Didn't work but a crude
colour photo resulted. hope you like it.
Tomkin

indexMy_Grannyfixxcolour.jpg (175.73 KB, 600x676 - viewed 62 times.)
	Logged

annaandchester
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 1178

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Re: My Granny
« Reply #27 on: Saturday 11 March 06 16:47 GMT (UK) »

Gosh - she looks stunning - What a fantastic result!

I cannot believe that a barely visible picture no bigger that a stamp could result in that kind of quality picture.

You have made my day!!!

Anna x


	Logged

dennford
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 2073

just resting for a while

Re: My Granny
« Reply #28 on: Sunday 12 March 06 00:49 GMT (UK) »

Another go

smallwebcopy.jpg (117.71 KB, 360x455 - viewed 45 times.)
	Logged

tomkin
RootsChat Aristocrat

Offline

Posts: 2386

Re: My Granny
« Reply #29 on: Sunday 12 March 06 01:22 GMT (UK) »

Hi Anna,
Another trial. This time it worked.
Tomkin

indexMy_Grannyfixxcolour2.jpg (183.98 KB, 600x676 - viewed 39 times.)
	Logged

Pages: 1 [2] 3

« previous next »

[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]

All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT

0.445:20