Can anyone tell me how far parents followed any scheme in naming their successive offspring such as taking their own parents' and grandparents' names in turn?
first daughter after mother's mother second daughter after father's mother third daughter after mother
first son after father's father second so after mother's father third son after father
but it wasn't followed 100%. It can be useful to help sort families out - for example I had two Grizel Leslies born in the same parish in the same year, one the daughter of a William and the other the daughter of a Joseph. Both married and had several sons - one had a William and no Joseph, the other a Joseph and no William - so no problem working out which was which.
But the pattern can be disrupted by all sorts of things, so it is only a guide, not a hard and fast rule.
Logged
Researching
AITKENHEAD, Lanarkshire; BINNY, Forfar; BLACK, New Monkland; BRYSON, Cumbernauld; BURGESS, North-East Scotland; CRUICKSHANK, Rothes; DALLAS, Botriphnie; DAVIDSON, Oyne; HOGG, Larbert; LESLIE, Rothes; LESLIE, Mortlach; MENDUM, England; PATERSON, Larbert; RHIND, Forfar; SANG, Scotland; SCOTT, East Kilbride; STOREY, New Monkland; THORNTON, Shotts; WADDELL, New Monkland; WILKIE, New Monkland; WILKIE, Tannadice; WYLLIE, Lethnot and Navar; YOUNG, Keith