Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Tuesday 14 October 08 12:04 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: Search the 1891 Wales Census - find them today.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Norfolk (Moderator: RootsChat)
| | | |-+  MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???  (Read 343 times)
jleewood
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 10



MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« on: Saturday 31 January 04 05:12 GMT (UK) »

Could SKS explain to me why the marriage of Thomas PIT to Mary Ann GRANT in 1802, at Brixham, DEV, is listed in the Boyd's Marriage Index for NFK???

I checked the IGI, and it is there, tho he is shown as PITT [as he should be!] and he was from NFK.

From his slightly demented ggg granddaughter, who often find him a pain in the 'neck'  Wink
Logged

PITT, WILCH, GREEN, ALDERTON, CARNELL - Great Yarmouth, NFK
WALL, NOBLE, LONGRIGG - Carlisle, CUM
MARTIN, FISHER, GILHAM - Newnham, HAM
PRESCOTT, SMITH [Samuel], BINIERE - London/Mdx
THOMAS, DAVIES - Glamorgan/Carmarthen
Fitty
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1111


Rooting through my Roots


WWW
Re:MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 07 February 04 10:43 GMT (UK) »

could it be a transcription error?

If you know for certain he is who he is, then i would just put it down to an error.
Logged

---------------------------------------                   
                    (  @ @  )
-----------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------

       Any one seen any BAXENDALES?

--------oooO---------------Oooo-------
           (    )                    (    )
            \\\\  (                      )  /
             \\\\_)                    (_/

Brighouse:  Smith
Lambeth: Clisby
Leeds: Baxendale,Baxter, Beales,Bowe
Sylviaann
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Online Online

Posts: 2594



Re:MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 07 February 04 12:12 GMT (UK) »

Perhaps, as he was from Norfolk, the Banns were called in his local Parish

Sylvia
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Norfolk: Gooch, Loveday, Lake, Betts
Suffolk: Gooch, Crosby, Turner
Hampshire: Laws, Burrows
Kent: Beer
Jersey: Barette, de Gruchy
East London: Middleton, Gower, O'Farrell, Smith, Weston
Chris in 1066Land
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5605


"Forever Searching, Forever Learning"


WWW
Re:MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 07 February 04 12:46 GMT (UK) »

jleewood & Fitty

"Could SKS explain to me why the marriage of Thomas PIT to Mary Ann GRANT in 1802, at Brixham, DEV, is listed in the Boyd's Marriage Index for NFK???"

Marriages were normally performed in the parish of the bride, unless they married by licence - A licence included an allegation and a bond.
Allegation was a sworn statement that canon or church law had been observed and there was no legal impediment to the marriage
Bond - two bondsmen lodged securities that parents or guardians had given permission and there was no pending impediment.  One bondsman was usually the groom and the other was very often a relative.
If married by Banns, they were called in both the bride and grooms own individual churches.

But - after saying that, many clergy were lax and often married couples without licence and without publication of banns and without them residing in a parish for the required period of time.

It could also have been a cross referencing system used by boyd to enable researchers to find marriages.

Chris in 1066Land (Hastings)  
« Last Edit: Saturday 07 February 04 13:23 GMT (UK) by Chris in 1066Land » Logged

One of Rootschats Founder Members
Living at the Heart of English History in 1066Land.         www.Rootschat.com/history/hastings
Own Ancestral Website:         http://maythorne.mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/
Information contained within Census Lookups is Crown Copyright:  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Fitty
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1111


Rooting through my Roots


WWW
Re:MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 07 February 04 12:53 GMT (UK) »

Of course!  I never thought of that... Undecided

Logged

---------------------------------------                   
                    (  @ @  )
-----------oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------

       Any one seen any BAXENDALES?

--------oooO---------------Oooo-------
           (    )                    (    )
            \\\\  (                      )  /
             \\\\_)                    (_/

Brighouse:  Smith
Lambeth: Clisby
Leeds: Baxendale,Baxter, Beales,Bowe
jleewood
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 10



Re:MARRIAGE WHERE IT SHOULDN'T BE???
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 08 February 04 03:31 GMT (UK) »

Thanks to everyone for their thoughts on this 'odd' marriage.

I have ordered the LDS film for the marriage in Devon, so I hope that will answer the question finally for me - that it is my ggg grandfather's first marriage.

Logged

PITT, WILCH, GREEN, ALDERTON, CARNELL - Great Yarmouth, NFK
WALL, NOBLE, LONGRIGG - Carlisle, CUM
MARTIN, FISHER, GILHAM - Newnham, HAM
PRESCOTT, SMITH [Samuel], BINIERE - London/Mdx
THOMAS, DAVIES - Glamorgan/Carmarthen
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.206:21