Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Friday 05 September 08 18:03 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: View the complete 1851 England Census online. No missing counties.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  Scotland (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  Scotland - General
| | |-+  Kirkcudbrightshire (Moderator: RootsChat)
| | | |-+  Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Not Thompson it's Jamieson  (Read 1089 times)
Gadget
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 16628



WWW
Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 05 November 06 14:28 GMT (UK) »

Hi duckweed

I think I might have found a strongly possible baptism for your Mary:

5 November 1849 (goodness that's today!), Mary Jamieson, daughter of William Jamieson and Mary Smith, at Kirkinner, Wigtownshire.  Vol 889 Page 2.

Kirkinner parish is south of Wigtown and just across the water from Kirkmabreck. It's the only one that I can find with a father William. They might have moved to Kirkcudbright when she was young and she remembered it.

For map:

http://scotlandsfamily.com/parish-map-wigtown.htm

Check the IGI for other siblings.

Gadget
Logged

Website: www.ancestral-tales.co.uk



My main Surname interests are on the Surname Interests Table  http://surname.rootschat.com/ and my website (above)

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
Gadget
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 16628



WWW
Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 05 November 06 15:33 GMT (UK) »

The following baptisms are recorded in Kirkinner to William Jamieson and Mary Smith:

27 February 1837   Margaret
25 August 1839      Helen
19 April 1842          Mary (probably died)
22 December 1844  Agnes Gracie
5 November 1849    Mary

Gadget
Logged

Website: www.ancestral-tales.co.uk



My main Surname interests are on the Surname Interests Table  http://surname.rootschat.com/ and my website (above)

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
MonicaLesl
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 4560



Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 05 November 06 17:15 GMT (UK) »

This is the entry in the 1851 Census for the William and Mary that Gadget is referring to in Kinkinner:

JAMMIESON William, 56, Agri. Labourer, head, b. Ireland
Address: Village of Marchfarm(889), Kinkinner

William and wife Mary (b. Kinkinner), with children and some lodgers all show in the household (x10 entries).

Monica
Logged

MacIsaac, MacDonald, MacPherson, MacVarish, MacMaster: Moidart - Inverness-shire.
Gillies: pre-1850 Knoydart, Inverness-shire /post 1850s Fort William area - Argyll.
Tully, Tulley, Moran, Murphy: Lanarkshire.
Durnan, Durnin, Kelly, Tully, McPhillips: Co Monaghan.
McIntyre, McMahon, Tully: Co Cavan (?) Ireland.
Moran: Co Mayo (?) Ireland.
..........and lots of Spanish name interests........
Gadget
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 16628



WWW
Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #18 on: Sunday 05 November 06 17:20 GMT (UK) »

This seems a really good fit, Monica  Smiley

My Robert Wilson, Shepherd was referred to in one census as an ag lab  Smiley

Gadget
Logged

Website: www.ancestral-tales.co.uk



My main Surname interests are on the Surname Interests Table  http://surname.rootschat.com/ and my website (above)

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
duckweed
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 303


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #19 on: Sunday 05 November 06 18:37 GMT (UK) »

I'm not convinced.  To say you are from Kircudbright when you are from Wigtownshire is just not on.  I know I lived in the Stewartry in Creetown and they were very upset when they moved the county boundaries and put it into Wigtownshire.  It's a bit like saying a Canadian is from the USA.  Even specific areas are fiercely loyal.  There's the Rhinns and the Machars. I just can't think she would claim to be from Kircudbright if she was from Wigtownshire even if her dad was Irish.
Logged
Gadget
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 16628



WWW
Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #20 on: Sunday 05 November 06 19:17 GMT (UK) »

It's where you first remember, duckweed.

Some of my ancestors said they were born Dumfriesshire but I have absolute proof - including letters, etc. - that they were born in the New Galloway/Balmaclellan/Parton area of Kirkcudbrightshire.

One has to be flexible in interpreting all the evidence.

At the end of the day, it's up to you to decide but I would like to say that a number of us have spent time and units looking for your ancestor and a Thank You might be polite.

Gadget
Logged

Website: www.ancestral-tales.co.uk



My main Surname interests are on the Surname Interests Table  http://surname.rootschat.com/ and my website (above)

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
duckweed
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 303


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 05 November 06 19:33 GMT (UK) »

I'm not ungreatful.  I don't have enough evidence to make a decision is all I'm saying.  I think I will get the marriage certificate and hopefully that will clear up the birthdate at least.  At the moment to me the New Abbey connection looks likely too.  It's a tricky one.  This side of the family has never been straightforward and has involved a lot more documents than the other side.  I'm going up to Scotland next year.  Maybe I can get more enlightenment then.  Thank you for all your trouble.
Logged
J.J.
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4753


Census Crown © www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


WWW
Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #22 on: Sunday 05 November 06 20:14 GMT (UK) »

  I'd seen the other entry, also, Monica and Gadget...but not knowing the proximity, I thought I'd keep my nose out of that part...You are so right about the remembering where one was raised rather than where born as I spent only the 5 years of my teenhood in one town, and I say that's where I'm from until I oops...no it's so and so... Cheesy
My Great Grandfather has 3 different census entries...all the moves for his father's business, perhaps, made it very confusing as to where he was born. Tongue
  These are two of rootchat's best, and they've seen lots of scenarios...so a maybe file would be a good idea, right or wrong...
   J.J.
   
   
Logged

Canadian  census  transcribed  data  ©  2005 www.AutomatedGenealogy.com
Gadget
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 16628



WWW
Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #23 on: Sunday 05 November 06 20:29 GMT (UK) »

There's just one last thing that's puzzling me  Undecided

Duckweed - you are more convinced that Mary was the New Abbey one, with father James rather than the Kirkinner one with a father William but  cannot bring yourself to think that 'Scotland, Kirkinner' might just have been misinterpreted/misread or misremembered as Kirkcudbright.

Gadget   Huh Huh Huh
Logged

Website: www.ancestral-tales.co.uk



My main Surname interests are on the Surname Interests Table  http://surname.rootschat.com/ and my website (above)

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
duckweed
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 303


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #24 on: Sunday 05 November 06 21:30 GMT (UK) »

I didn't know that. I was going by a census report a friend gave me for 1841 and 1851.  Maybe you are right but since in the 1891 census the supplier of information is the Woman herself and she says Kircudbright to the census taker, I choose to believe her. I don't think either are a good fit.  Maybe she lied about her age too.  There are a lot of Jamiesons both in Kircudbright, Dumfries and Creetown but then it is a fairly common name.  I still can't find her in England in 1871.  I know she was living near Skipton in 1872 but I haven't made a match yet.  I haven't been able to put any substance to William either.  He was living in 1872 according to the parish records but had died by 1884. 
Logged
florabrooks
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 59



Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #25 on: Friday 17 November 06 15:26 GMT (UK) »

Hi,Duckweed,Have you tried to find out if your family of Jamieson,s are from the travelling people,I have Jamieson,s in my line who travelled in England and Scotland,My Jamieson,s were married into the Wilson family.As yet i dont know a lot about them as it is hard to get records.
What i do have is a Michael Jamieson married to a Grace Wilson, they were married in St margarets church York 1849.They had a Daughter Margaret who married a Thomas Wilson "dont know when or where yet", but i know that they had a son Thomas who was born in Liverpool 1880,Margaret Jamieson died in Paisley 1919 in the Showground Paisley.So i think that the families of Jamieson and Wilson may have been people who followed Travelling fairs.
  Also they mention of Creetown and surrounding areas,a lot of travelling people used to camp in these areas.
  Might be no connection at all, just thought i would let you know about my Jamieson,s.
   Good Luck with your search. Flo
Logged
duckweed
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 303


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #26 on: Friday 17 November 06 16:03 GMT (UK) »

Thanks it's not something I had thought of but it is another avenue of research.  Jamieson seem to travel a lot generally.  Probably from the irish connection but also many are in the navy too.  I don't think mine are travellers by their occupations but then you do get travelling farm workers too I suppose. 
Logged
runner
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 531



Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 21 November 06 00:03 GMT (UK) »

Hi Duckweed

Another Butinsky here!
You say   
Quote
you do get travelling farm workers too I suppose.
Travellers and itinerant families from Ireland were the mainstay of the Scottish agricultural process right up to the 1950's. When larger fields were created to take the big machines.
Families would move to an area for the planting, move on to another area where there was an early sowing for 'singling'  and weeding, move on again for the early pea picking, move up to Perth area for the berry harvest then back down to Lothian or Ayrshire for the 'Tattie howkin'.
Their children might be in the local school for a month or six weeks till the family moved on. Some farmers kept bothies for the family to live in. The same families would return year on year.
Some Jamiesons in the Kirkcudbrightshire area were settled, and wealthy farmers over a long span of years.

Russell
Logged

Oman in Caithness, Reside in Renfrewshire,
Roan or Rowan Kirkcudbrightshire/Ayrshire
Watsons in Kilrenny and Mortons in Edinburgh.
duckweed
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 303


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 21 November 06 15:40 GMT (UK) »

That's interesting.  Have you details of any  such Jamiesons  in Kirkudbrightshire or nearby counties? 
Logged
runner
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 531



Re: Not Thompson it's Jamieson
« Reply #29 on: Sunday 26 November 06 00:57 GMT (UK) »

Hi Duckweed
Sorry it has taken a few days to get back to you with my answer !

For info about wealthy farming Jamiesons look at a previous post
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,167672.msg799461.html#msg799461

Richard Jamieson had brothers Robert and William who were also farmers. Robert went out to Australia and set up farms out there and his descendants still live out there.

Russell
Logged

Oman in Caithness, Reside in Renfrewshire,
Roan or Rowan Kirkcudbrightshire/Ayrshire
Watsons in Kilrenny and Mortons in Edinburgh.
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.156:21