I am looking for some help here with a marriage of William Field/Sarah Ann (nee Bourne) in Birmingham in 1848. With a possible IGI transcription error i'm not sure if this is a Kings Norton or Kings Lynn marriage. Residence in 1853 was Sherborne Street, Birmingham. Any info appreciated. Lyn
Logged
Field, Eng/N.Z Lewer, Surrey/N.Z Turner, Kent/N.Z Linn, Scotland/N.Z. Vartha, Cornwall/N.Z
Looking at http://freebmd.rootsweb.com it looks like a transcription error as Sarah Ann Bourne is shown as Kings Norton but William Field as Kings Lynn.
Sarah Ann Bourne Mar 1848 Kings Norton 18 415
There is a query on William Field to show a possible mis-transcription.
Nanny Jan
Logged
Howard , Viney , Kingsman, Pain/e, Rainer/ Rayner, Barham, George, Wakeling (Catherine), Vicary (Frederick) all LDN area/suburbs Ottley/ MDX, Henman/ KNT Gandy/LDN before 1830 Burgess/LDN Barham SFK
The actual images show William as King's Norton and Sarah as Kings Lynn but with the same vol. & page numbers 18 415 so it must be a transcription error
The actual volume numbers are Kings Lynn,XIII Kings Norton,XVIII
so 18 would mean Kings Norton
Barbara
Logged
Census and bmd information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk Norfolk - Ebbs Whiterod Zipfell Lincs & Yorks - Sivills Predgen Sweden - Jönsson Cronberg Andersson Yorks - Spence Hide Hird Durham - Dalkin Selby Renwick Somerset - Keen Hitchins