|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: JOHN OSBORN 1811 - 1841 lookup (Read 199 times)
|
osborn
RootsChat Member
 Offline
Posts: 143
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
JOHN OSBORN ch. 30 Dec., 1811, Thurleigh, Bdf.
(Father = John Watts Osborn abt. 1782, Thurleigh
Mother = Susan/Susannah LAW , abt. 1786, Bletsoe.
There was another brother also named JOHN, b. 1810 and died 1811.)
Lookup for 1841 census (also 51, 61 and 71, but do I need to start new topics for each census?)
Let me know so I can do the right thing!!
Thanks, Osborn???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
 Online
Posts: 3677
|
What's going on?
Why post on Hunts when it's a Beds look up?
Isn't this the same request that you posted on the Beds board 3 days ago (and got a complete answer to the same day)?
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=218635.0
You won't get a different answer by reposting on a different county, and you'll get people's backs up into the bargain.
The right thing is to post on the appropriate county Lookup Requests board, not on the main county board (that saves the moderator having to move them each time) with the Subject "John Osborn 1841-51-61-71 census lookup". Having more than one census in a lookup is OK.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell |
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 3677
|
John
The extracted entries on the IGI look odd, as John and Susan would have had 2 sons both named John living at the same time, before one or other of them died in June 1811. On the face of it, it looks as though the second John should be 30 Dec 1811, not 1810, yet it doesn't seem as though it's an IGI transcription error as they had another son Samuel christened on 22 Dec 1811, so it's hardly likely they'd have baptised another 8 days afterwards. And the burial date looks right as 1810 would have predated both 1810 christenings.
I'm perplexed!
David
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Thursday 08 March 07 13:44 GMT (UK) by bedfordshire boy »
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell |
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 3677
|
It's odd as there doesn't seem to be any other Osborns reproducing at that time in Thurleigh. Otherwise I'd have wondered if the vicar had put the wrong couple down as the parents in the PR
later....might John 1 have been sickly and wasn't expected to live long, so they named the next John as well? I've never come across it before but it's the only explanation I can come up with for now
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Thursday 08 March 07 17:47 GMT (UK) by bedfordshire boy »
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell |
|
|
osborn
RootsChat Member
Offline
Posts: 143
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
I had found:
Family Search Family Group Record:
John Osborn (i) ch. 29 July, 1810, Thurleigh, Bdf.
d. 23 June, 1811
John Osborn (ii) ch. 30 Dec. 1811, Thurleigh, Bdf.
then, in the IGI Indiv. Record:
John Osborn (ii) ch. 30 Dec, 1810, Thurleigh, Bdf.
then, 1841 Census Thurleigh HO107/8/18 f 12B, pge 19
John Osborn, 25 (born 1816???)
then, 1851 census HO/107/1751 ed5. fol,167, pge. 13
John Osborn, 48 (born 1813???)
1861 and 1871 census both suggest that he was born
1813.
What to believe??
THEN, there is a Peesey Osborn ch. 17 Jan, 1819 and an Emma Osborn ch. 3 Sept, 1821. Both with father = John Osborn and Mother = Susannah. (These last two are from the IGI Indiv. record.)
Where do I go from here? Osborn:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
|
