|
Pages: 1 2 [3]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: 1891 census look up (Read 434 times)
|
geno500
RootsChat Member
 Offline
Posts: 202
|
I think you are right Charles Casbolt has led a very interesting life,marrys a Mary Betchetti in Newcastle and lives with her in 1891 census no kids at Cambridge,then leaves her between 1891 and 1893 and marry's Mary Ann Barker in Sept quart 1893 at Saffron Walden and has three children with her then lives with her elder sister Alice Barker in Cambridge and has at least four children with her and dies in 1906 aged 50,he must have left Mary Ann Barker not long before the 1901 census so she put down she was a widow in the census,in the 1901 census Charles Casbolts only wife who he married in Newcastle is alive and well living in Kettering and is a Charwoman,well thats seems to be the story behind the results we have from the census and certs,but I wanted to make sure by getting to Essex Records to look up the Mary Ann Barker marriage which will I believe have taken place at Littlebury,this will give me his fathers name and so we could then be certain,but the records are closed Friday and all of next week as well so I will have to wait.
Best Regards Brian.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
geno500
RootsChat Member
Offline
Posts: 202
|
Not sure I only looked at the 1901 census site I did not see the actual census,so thats two more children to add to the brood did Mary say she was married or a widow? and we have a Hampshire birth as well,makes a change from Essex or Cambridge.
Brian.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
geno500
RootsChat Member
Offline
Posts: 202
|
No I don't think we are straying,both the children are in the freebmd,and of course as he married Mary in 1878 we still have 6/7 years when they could have had more before he left,the children from the early years of this marriage would be old enough by the 1901 to be on there own,but apart from there being loads of half brothers and sisters ,It's not that important in the context of the Casbolt /Barker connection,its just a shame I cannot wrap this up until I can get to the records,thanks for you help.
Brian.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
geno500
RootsChat Member
Offline
Posts: 202
|
Hi Just to let you know that I pulled the Littlebury records and Mary A Casbolt who said she was a widow in 1901 census was telling the truth,but the amazing thing is she married a Charles Casbolt who died in 1898,this death has not been sent on to central records,just shows you cannot be certain with free bmd that all the records are there even if it has been law since about 1875,the old parish records still win out sometimes,well it is still weird that Mary's sister lived and had children with another Charles Casbolt who was already married,my friend has now got the family history bug and so he is now in charge of this search,thanks for all your help.
Best Regards Brian.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
 Online
Posts: 3680
|
It's not FreeBMD, who transcribe literally what's in the GRO index. So if it's not in the index FreeBMD obviously can't transcribe it.
The local register office may have mistranscribed the entry when sending it off to the GRO, or may have missed it off altogether. If you check with the register office rather than the GRO you may find the entry.
Remember that, at least in theory, after 1837 the church was not allowed to bury anyone without sight of the death registration. You seem to have found the burial rather than the death.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell |
|
|
geno500
RootsChat Member
Offline
Posts: 202
|
Hi David
I think you missed the point,of my posting,it was to let Willow know that I had found the last bit of the puzzle as far as I was concerned,and to make a observation that you still have to get out from behind the computer with all the cd's and Ancestry and go to the good old parish records,and I am quiet sure that it is not in the GRO and as you pointed cannot be in freebmd because of that,but I used freebmd in my posting because thats what most people use,not living near London,and most people not wanting to get invovled with local registry offices which may be open on Monday from 11am to 2 pm,with regard to finding a burial rather than a death,thats what I went looking for if my pal wants to know when Charles Casbolt who married his partners sister actually died he may have to get along to Saffron Walden registry office one monday morning. Still Willow and I had a great chase for this family history.
Best Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3]
|
|
|
|
|
