|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: FINCH - Southill (Read 3683 times)
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
       
Posts: 4734
|
OK, can't leave this up in mid air!
BVRI Children of William & Mary Chambers baptised at Southill
Samuel 15 Apr 1832 Charles 25 Jun 1837 Marianne 25 Jun 1837 so either or both Charles and Marianne could have been a late baptism
There's a burial of William Chambers age 51 at Southill on 17 Feb 1853
And this time I really am calling it a day before JP can post a follow up! (But he already has!!!)
David
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell
|
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
       
Posts: 4734
|
I think so John. It all ties up. Massey was a Southill name as well.
But why did they change from Chambers to Finch?
But they all seem to have been baptised, just with a name other than Finch, which seems to have put paid to the theory that they were dissenters (although they may have been and hedged their bets by baptising the children in the established church)
And yes, Andi, I read woodman as well in 1851
The other area of concern is William senior's birth - the enumerator kindly didn't follow instructions in 1841 and gave his exact age - 39, whereas in 1851 he'd either aged badly to be 56 or more plausibly I think the 6 is actually a badly formed 0 -it's nothing like the bold 6's below and is more like the 0 lower down the page except he didn't close the circle. What do you think JP, I see you're up early and amending last night's message!
David
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell
|
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
       
Posts: 4734
|
Just found this on A2A
Ref: QSR/17/1798/49a
Recognizances: Jos. Finch, Langford, lab.; bastardy. WITH SARAH CHAMBERS
Might be connected
I'll see if I can see who the child was
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
       
Posts: 4734
|
Yep, that may be it.
The William christened 14 Oct 1800 mother Sarah Chambers was illegitimate, per the transcript. The date ties in with the census - BUT it doesn't tie in with a 1798 bastardy recognisance. And I can't see an earlier illegitimate Chambers in either Southill or Langford
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell
|
|
|
|
|
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Marquessate
       
Posts: 3141

..& Mrs Reardon said he has a brother somewhere..
|
Been thinking ! , It's odd that there are 2 extracted baptisms of William Chambers on 4 OCT 1800, the other is to William & Susannah, what does transcript say about this other one. Cannot be two babies, same name, same day ? can there.
Plus the 1841 entry of William Chambers age 55 being a Thatcher, & then William C b 1802 also being a Thatcher, a family trade ..... & only living 2 doors apart.
So I reckon William may have been the bastard son of Sarah, & this Sarah being related to William age 55, who then brought up the younger William as his son.
... but why does William Finch on 1851 become a Woodsman rather than be a Thatcher
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukPartridge - North Beds; Peterborough Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts Clement - Croydon ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
       
Posts: 4734
|
John
I covered the three christened on the same day yesterday 23.07 - described as "of riper years", and as such Sarah might well be mother of William
There were definitely two Williams christened on 14 Sept 1800, one illegitimate son of Sarah, the other son of William and Susanna. No other detail in the transcript. I have seen it before though, where an illegitimate child is baptised on the same day as a cousin; perhaps draws attention away from the illegitimate one.
Just back from town where we meet up each Sat lunchtime, after the market (red wine as well John, so you'll be OK!). Too hot to stay out now though! Visitors taking a siesta so have a few mins to think about the Finches
More soon
david
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukBeds: Cople: Luke/Spencer Everton: Hale Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey Potton: Merrill Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt Hunts: Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn Cambs: Bourn: Bowd Eltisley: Medlock Graveley: Ford/Revell
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
|
|
|
|
|