Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Friday 05 September 08 18:27 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: New! FULL 1841 Census: England - Isle of Man - Wales  - Channel Islands Now online. No missing counties.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Lincolnshire (Moderator: RootsChat)
| | | |-+  SMITH but which one?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: SMITH but which one?  (Read 502 times)
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


SMITH but which one?
« on: Friday 20 April 07 21:11 BST (UK) »

Hi everyone,
I am having a little trouble with my Grandfather's line. There is not much info available plus the name Smith doesn't help matters much!

All I know is that his parents were Henry Herbert and Frances and they lived in Lincolnshire and moved to Cardiff. They had at least 10 children, some born in Lincolnshire and some (including my Grandad) in Cardiff. He didn't have contact with the older ones.

On FreeBMD I found a Harry Herbert who married a Frances Elizabeth Newham, Dec 1898 in Bourne, but I can't be sure it is the correct couple.

The children's names are: Dorothy, Henry, Kenneth, Francis, Frederick, Helen, Hilda, Ernest, Eve and John Edward (my Grandad DOB Nov 1915).

Any help would be great as I need to be be on the right track in the first place to continue tracing this line.

Thanks Andi
Logged

"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999



Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #1 on: Friday 20 April 07 21:24 BST (UK) »

There was a John E SMITH reg in Cardiff in Q4 1915, mother nee NEWHAM, 11a 586

Your 1898 marriage find looks pretty good to me.

Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #2 on: Friday 20 April 07 21:33 BST (UK) »

Fantastic!  Grin
Thanks for that confirmation Geoff.

I had gone up a couple of blind alleys before with Henry's not Harry's!

Is there any way of checking which children were born where?
Also the POB and DOB of Harry and Frances?
Logged

"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999



Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #3 on: Friday 20 April 07 21:51 BST (UK) »

Could they have got to Cardiff via Nottingham??  They didn't put mother's maiden names with the births until 1911

There's

Births Dec 1911 
Smith    Henry    (Newham)    Nottingham    7b   697   

Births Mar 1914   
SMITH    Ernest    (Newham)    Nottingham    7b   690   

Births Dec 1915   
Smith    John E    (Newham)    Cardiff    11a   586
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #4 on: Friday 20 April 07 22:07 BST (UK) »

I've got no idea where they stopped on the way, but I don't see why not. I have no idea of what work Harry was in, but presumably something which allowed him to pick up jobs on the move and support his family at the same time.

I found Dorothy's birth in Bourne 3rd Quarter 1899 along with Francis, so presume they are twins.
Logged

"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999



Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #5 on: Friday 20 April 07 22:32 BST (UK) »

I think I may have them in 1901

Easton on the Hill, Northants
Richard SMITH 50 Agric Machine Owner, Lincs Carlby
Rose 40 Grantham
Harry H (son) 26 Engine Driver, Grimsby
Frances E 20 Witham on the Hill
Francis H (g son) 1 Carlby
Lilian M 8m Carlby

I did spot this when I was looking earlier - it looks like it was the one
Births Jun 1874 
Smith    Harry Herbert         Caistor    7a   651

I'll be back later - you can search the 1881 census at
http://www.familysearch.org/Eng/Search/frameset_search.asp?PAGE=census/search_census.asp
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #6 on: Friday 20 April 07 22:42 BST (UK) »

That looks like them, thanks  Smiley

I also found a George Thomas on the same birth registration page as Harry Herbert. Could they be twins or cousins?
Logged

"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2781


Grand baby Jack 21/08/2008


WWW
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #7 on: Friday 20 April 07 22:44 BST (UK) »

Hello Andi;  Thanks Geoff for that last bit

It now (sort of) confirms the 1891 census entry I found, living in Witham on the Hill, Lincs;  Reg District = Bourn

RG12/2557  Folio 145  Page 3

Charles E Newham, head, age 33, born Witham on the Hill ; Tailor
Ruth Newham, wife, age 41, born Surfleet, Spalding, Lincs
Frances E Newham, daughter, age 9, born Burton on Trent, Staffs ; Scholar

+ Robert C Smith, boarder, single, age 40, born Witham on the Hill ; General Labourer
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Partridge - North Beds;  Peterborough
Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey
Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts
Clement - Croydon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #8 on: Friday 20 April 07 22:48 BST (UK) »

Hello again John!

You guys did such a fantastic job on my last post that I had to try it again! I have recommended this site to all I know who are tracing their family history. Only wish I'd found it years ago!!

Will have to post the other names in my tree to see what comes up...

Thanks again for the great help  Grin
Logged

"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2781


Grand baby Jack 21/08/2008


WWW
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #9 on: Friday 20 April 07 22:58 BST (UK) »

staying in 1891, living at Smith's Farm Carlby Lincs

RG12/2557; Folio 159; Page 2.

Richard Smith, head, age 40, born Carlby ; Farmer
Mary Jane Smith, wife, age 39 , born Wainfleet, Lincs
Harry Herbert Smith, son, age 16, born Grimsby ; 'farmers son'
Annie Dunkley Smith, daughter, age 14, born Carlby ; scholar
Robert Smith, son, age 12, born Carlby ; scholar
Maria Smith  age 9
George Smith age 7
Hobson Smith age 6
Charles A Smith age 5
Gertrude Smith age 3

last 5 children all born Carlby

Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Partridge - North Beds;  Peterborough
Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey
Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts
Clement - Croydon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #10 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:11 BST (UK) »

So who's Rose on the 1901 census? 2nd wife?
Logged

"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999



Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #11 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:20 BST (UK) »

Charles B Newham, head, age 33, born Witham on the Hill ; Tailor
Ruth Newham, wife, age 41, born Surfleet, Spalding, Lincs
Frances E Newham, daughter, age 9, born Burton on Trent, Staffs ; Scholar

+ Robert C Smith, boarder, single, age 40, born Witham on the Hill ; General Labourer

You failed to mention the next door neighbours

Samuel NEWHAM 61 Tailor, Northants Middleton
Frances 62 Laundress, Rutland Market Overton
Jane (dau,unm) 27 Cook Dom Servant, Witham on the Hill
Edward (g son) 1 Leicester
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999



Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #12 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:25 BST (UK) »

So who's Rose on the 1901 census? 2nd wife?

Deaths Dec 1898
SMITH    Mary Jane    47    Bourne    7a   216

possibly ...
Marriages Sep 1899
HOLMES    Rose        Stamford    7a   764   
Rothery    Herbert         Stamford    7a   764   
SMITH Richard        Stamford    7a   764   
Stanger    Margaret         Stamford    7a   764

NB: Stamford District includes Easton on the Hill http://www.ukbmd.org.uk/genuki/reg/districts/stamford.html
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2781


Grand baby Jack 21/08/2008


WWW
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #13 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:25 BST (UK) »

Well I'm now back to 1881, to find Charles Edward Newham & wife Ruth living in Horninglow, Staffordshire, along with his brother Samuel H age 25 & sister Sarah E age 20, both born Witham on the Hill, Lincs

RG11/2765; Folio: 101; Page: 30
Reg Distr.  Burton on Trent
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Partridge - North Beds;  Peterborough
Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey
Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts
Clement - Croydon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2781


Grand baby Jack 21/08/2008


WWW
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #14 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:30 BST (UK) »

+ most likely marriage in Burton on Trent RD vol 6b page 447  in July-Sept 1876, names listed include Charles Edward Newham & Ruth Eldridge.
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Partridge - North Beds;  Peterborough
Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey
Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts
Clement - Croydon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.154:21