Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Monday 06 October 08 21:23 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images Online
 
  First Name(s)
Last Name
 
News: Ad: New! FULL 1841 Census: England - Isle of Man - Wales  - Channel Islands Now online. No missing counties.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Lincolnshire (Moderator: RootsChat)
| | | |-+  SMITH but which one?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: SMITH but which one?  (Read 555 times)
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #15 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:31 BST (UK) »
JohnP-bedford

You're in danger of reaching your 2,000 posts tonight!  I was going to suggest a party, but the girls are notable by their absence  Sad
Logged
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2807


Grand baby Jack 21/08/2008


WWW
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #16 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:35 BST (UK) »
Geoff - they are lost - I expect they couldn't read the map !
Logged
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Partridge - North Beds;  Peterborough
Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey
Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts
Clement - Croydon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #17 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:41 BST (UK) »
Marriages Dec 1872
Dunkley    Mary Jane        Caistor    7a   1357   
Smith    Richard         Caistor    7a   1357

hence a daughter Annie Dunkley SMITH in 1881.

1861
East St, Carlby
Herbert SMITH 37 Miller and Baker, Carlby
Mary Anne 39 Manthorpe
Richard 10 Miller's Assistant, Carlby
Juliann (dau) 8 Carlby
Frederick 4 Carlby
John 1 Carlby

Marriage?
23 June 1847 Witham on the Hill
Herbert SMITH (son of John) to Mary Ann SMEATON (dau of David)
Logged
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #18 on: Friday 20 April 07 23:50 BST (UK) »
1861
Back St, Wainfleet All Saints
All DUNKLEY
Hobson 40 Builder Emp 6 men and 3 boys, Old Bolingbroke
Maria 38 Burgh
Richard Hobson 16 Burgh
Maria 15 Burgh
George 13
Eliza Skelton 11
Mary Jane 10
Ann 8
Emma 5
Sarah Ann 3
Kate 2
William 7m
Others born Wainfleet All Saints

Marriage
20 June1843 Burgh le Marsh
Hobson DUNKLEY (son of Richard) to Maria SKELTON (dau of Samuel)
Logged
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Geoff E
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2999
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 21 April 07 00:10 BST (UK) »
1841 census
Manthorpe
David SMEATON 45 Baker (NOT Lincs
Mary 50 (NOT Lincs
Charles 20
Frederick 20
Mary 20
David 15
Maria 15
Joseph 13
Henry 10
William 10
Alice 7
Others born Lincs
NB: Ages over 15 were supposed to be rounded DOWN in 1841 census.

1841
Carlby
Richard SMITH 30 Farmer
Herbert 15
Luke SISSON?/LIXON 65 AgLab (NOT Lincs
Logged
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
johnP-bedford
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2807


Grand baby Jack 21/08/2008


WWW
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 21 April 07 07:28 BST (UK) »
The Lilian M Smith age 8 months that Geoff found on 1901 census,  could be this birth index found in Bourne RD in Sept 1900 vol 7a page 382  - lists a Lilian Mary Smith.

& why wasn't Dorothy shown with family on 1901 census, perhaps she died.
There is a possible death index for a Dorothy Smith in Caistor RD in Dec 1900 vol 7a page 372 (born 1899)
Logged
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Partridge - North Beds;  Peterborough
Bishop - Bedford; Hunts, Hemingford Grey
Allen - Hunts, Hemingford Abbotts
Clement - Croydon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AB321
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: SMITH but which one?
« Reply #21 on: Saturday 21 April 07 18:40 BST (UK) »
Thanks again for filling the puzzle pieces!
I now have enough to go on to continue searching this line of my tree by myself -til the next hurdle anyway!! Grin


Logged
"Barnsley" - Staffordshire   "Stokes" - Staffordshire   "Dunn" - Staffordshire   "Stradwick" - Middlesex/London    "Finch" - Bedfordshire   "Williamson" - Bedfordshire   "Smith" - Lincolnshire
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.287:20