Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Tuesday 01 December 09 17:03 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Huntingdonshire (Moderator: RootsChat)
| | | |-+  Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????  (Read 476 times)
soulsister
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 756


Alice Taylor nee Collinson 1875-1957


WWW
Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« on: Wednesday 23 May 07 18:46 UTC (UK) »

Hi all

Wondering if someone could help sort something out for me.

My gtx5 grandfather, JONATHAN LEWIN was born in 1795, in leighton bromswold, the son of JONATHAN LEWIN and SARAH BEAL.

Jonathan and one of his brothers, CHARLES, resided in Brington for most of their lives until their deaths.

I have the will of both JONATHAN and his brother CHARLES and also the death dates of each, from all the information i have collected these two are DEFINITELY brothers.

Now the confusing part starts!

I have a list of baptisms from the Leighton Bromswold PRs with all children of Jonathan Lewin and Sarah Beal, BUT there are no CHARLES'!!!!

Charles died, aged 36, in 1829 so this would give him a birth year of around
1793. The only baptism that year is for twin boys by the names of Jonathan and William. Jonathan died and was buried in May the same year.

There are 3 baptisms for WILLIAMs to Jonathan and sarah.
The 1st being in 1791
The 2nd in 1793 (the twin)
and the 2rd in 1804.

Now there are 2 burials for williams.
One in oct 1793
and another in mar 1805.

My own idea is that the twin WILLIAM is actually my CHARLES, but i have no proof!!
The twin was born in april 1793, 4 months before any william had died!! If the first william had died then i would understand the naming of another son by that name, but why name him that when the first wiliam is still alive!!

Then we have the bap of the 3rd william whilst the 2nd william is still alive!!

I do hope i havent confused anyone and do hope you can understand what i have written!

Would you agree that the twin WILLIAM is indeed my CHARLES? Or should i look further??

Emma.
Logged

Yorkshire: Bennison, Sedman, Collinson, Taylor, Lambert, Ness
Cumberland: Carrick
Hunts, Leicstershire, Beds: Lewin, Kemp, Beale
Middlesex: Gadsdon, Matts, Stephenson, Sharp
Lincolnshire: Stephenson, Would, Blythman
Ireland: Callan, Sheerstone, Cleary, Duggan
Scotland: Bunyan/Bullion
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 4759



Re: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 23 May 07 19:29 UTC (UK) »

It certainly is unusual that they should name another child William when a previous one was still living.

So either the first or second William could be a PR error, but the age at death of Charles points to it being the first William who died.

Have you checked the parish register on microfilm as opposed to relying on a transcript (the BVRI for example)? If you have and if my reading of what's in the BTs is correct ie they are missing for this period, then you are unlikely to be able to prove that the PR is wrong. But the circumstantial evidence looks strong

Your call!

Regards

David

Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Beds:   Cople: Luke/Spencer
            Everton: Hale
            Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey
            Potton:  Merrill
            Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey
            Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt
Hunts:  Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock
            Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn         
Cambs:  Bourn: Bowd
             Eltisley: Medlock
             Graveley: Ford/Revell
soulsister
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 756


Alice Taylor nee Collinson 1875-1957


WWW
Re: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 23 May 07 19:36 UTC (UK) »

Yes, these have been checked on the PRs microfilm!!

So they really did call him William!!  How odd??!!

id say he was William Charles, aka Charles!!

Emma.
Logged

Yorkshire: Bennison, Sedman, Collinson, Taylor, Lambert, Ness
Cumberland: Carrick
Hunts, Leicstershire, Beds: Lewin, Kemp, Beale
Middlesex: Gadsdon, Matts, Stephenson, Sharp
Lincolnshire: Stephenson, Would, Blythman
Ireland: Callan, Sheerstone, Cleary, Duggan
Scotland: Bunyan/Bullion
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 4759



Re: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 23 May 07 20:13 UTC (UK) »

No, he was entered in the register as William, which is not the same as "they really did call him William". Whoever entered it may have made a mistake and he should have written Charles. It wouldn't have been the first time it's happened - in Beds where all pre 1812 registers have been transcribed, any differences between the PR and the BT are noted. There are quite a few.

I don't buy the William Charles idea

David
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Beds:   Cople: Luke/Spencer
            Everton: Hale
            Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey
            Potton:  Merrill
            Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey
            Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt
Hunts:  Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock
            Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn         
Cambs:  Bourn: Bowd
             Eltisley: Medlock
             Graveley: Ford/Revell
soulsister
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 756


Alice Taylor nee Collinson 1875-1957


WWW
Re: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 23 May 07 20:19 UTC (UK) »

Ah, thats probably better then as the name WILLIAM isnt mentioned anywhere else down the line.

Do you know whether the BTs are completely missing or just not completed??

Emma.
Logged

Yorkshire: Bennison, Sedman, Collinson, Taylor, Lambert, Ness
Cumberland: Carrick
Hunts, Leicstershire, Beds: Lewin, Kemp, Beale
Middlesex: Gadsdon, Matts, Stephenson, Sharp
Lincolnshire: Stephenson, Would, Blythman
Ireland: Callan, Sheerstone, Cleary, Duggan
Scotland: Bunyan/Bullion
bedfordshire boy
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 4759



Re: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 23 May 07 20:33 UTC (UK) »

I just checked the film notes in the LDS catalogue, but I would double check with Huntingdon Records Office as to exactly what it is they are holding

David
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Beds:   Cople: Luke/Spencer
            Everton: Hale
            Henlow: Cooper/Watts/Sabey
            Potton:  Merrill
            Southill: Faulkner/Litchfield/Sabey
            Woburn/Husborne Crawley: Surkitt
Hunts:  Gt Gransden: Merrill/Chandler/Medlock
            Toseland: Surkitt/Hedge/Corn         
Cambs:  Bourn: Bowd
             Eltisley: Medlock
             Graveley: Ford/Revell
soulsister
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 756


Alice Taylor nee Collinson 1875-1957


WWW
Re: Is CHARLES actually WILLIAM?????
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 23 May 07 20:48 UTC (UK) »

Thankyou for the advice, i will get onto that asap!!

Regards

Emma.
Logged

Yorkshire: Bennison, Sedman, Collinson, Taylor, Lambert, Ness
Cumberland: Carrick
Hunts, Leicstershire, Beds: Lewin, Kemp, Beale
Middlesex: Gadsdon, Matts, Stephenson, Sharp
Lincolnshire: Stephenson, Would, Blythman
Ireland: Callan, Sheerstone, Cleary, Duggan
Scotland: Bunyan/Bullion
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT

In loving memory of Eric George Davies, 1934-2009, the father of RootsChat.com































Powered by SMF 1.0.7 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
0.037:19