Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Thursday 21 August 08 07:12 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: View the complete 1851 England Census online. No missing counties.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  Beginners
| |-+  How to Use RootsChat
| | |-+  To reply or not to reply?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Author Topic: To reply or not to reply?  (Read 2454 times)
Arranroots
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9181


~ Grand Aunt Jenny ~


To reply or not to reply?
« on: Friday 31 December 04 15:56 GMT (UK) »

Have just looked at the Netiquette section and I am still unsure whether an unanswered posting should be answered, even if the reply is negative.

Fr'instance:  sometimes you come across a message that has been posted and read by lots of people, but not replied to.

Now, does this mean - no-one can be bothered to reply because the answer is complicated or from a resource they don't have...

OR does it mean, we've all looked and there was nothing that matched the query?

A few times I have tried to answer and found nothing that matches (probably lots of others had already done this too!!) , but then had the dilemma that the enquirer may get terribly excited to see a reply and be crestfallen when it says "nothing found".

On the other hand, I have posted some msgs that have got no replies and I can't help wondering why?

What are YOUR preferences in this??
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SOM: BIRD, BURT aka BROWN
HEF: BAUGH, LATHAM, CARTER, PRITCHARD
GLS: WEBB, WORKMAN, LATHAM, MALPUS
WIL: WEBB, SALTER
RAD: PRITCHARD, WILLIAMS
GLA: RYAN, KEARNEY, JONES, HARRY
MON: WEBB, MORGAN, WILLIAMS, JONES, BIRD
SCOTLAND: HASTINGS, CAMERON, KELSO, BUCHANAN, BETHUNE/ BEATON
IRELAND: RYAN (WATERFORD), KEARNEY, BOYLE (DUNDALK)
Falkyrn
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4592


Someday lad ........


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #1 on: Friday 31 December 04 16:48 GMT (UK) »

Personally I would prefer any reply even the negatives .... at least then you know that your message has not drifted off into the unknown .... plus an answer brings it to the top of the list again and it may get more attention there 2nd time around.
Logged

~RJ Paton~
Searching for: PATTON: GOURLAY: DEWAR : MACLELLAN : STEWART, FERGUSON : WIGGINS, FLUKE, POGUE (POLLOCK).

Cuimhnich air na daoine o'n d'thainig thu
casalguidi
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 10435



Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #2 on: Friday 31 December 04 16:58 GMT (UK) »

I, too, feel the same as Arranroots and must admit to (on occasion) not replying to postings where I have looked but not found the answer.  I now tend to post a reply even if it is negative - perhaps with a suggestion or two to follow up or just to give some indication of why the answer can't be found.

However, Falkyrn, I agree with you too but sometimes tend to ignore postings that have already had an answer Undecided

Casalguidi
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Biker
RootsChat Honorary
RootsChat Marquessate
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4620



Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #3 on: Friday 31 December 04 17:04 GMT (UK) »

I think a response to the negative (i.e. had a look and couldn't find anything) is best.  The negative response can narrow down the search and eliminate certain options which can be useful for further broadening the search.

If I look, I generally post a negative if appropriate, though I admit if rushed I have not done so on occasion  Embarrassed

Cheers
Jonathan
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Kazza
Welsh Lass
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1784


Looking into Holes


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 15 January 05 03:37 GMT (UK) »

With my moderator hat on:  Grin

I think any answer,  even a negative is worthwhile.  I read every post in the boards I moderate,  so even a posting with negative answers will be reviewed and I will add to it where I am able,  or even just try to stimulate further interest. 

There is nothing more off-putting for a newbie than recieving no answer to a question that has been read many times.  No feed-back is no help at all.  If it is a poorly put question by a newbie I try to point them in the right direction,  we all have to start somewhere.  Tongue

Kazza.
Logged



Surname interests:
Clementsten, Hobson, Hole, Marden, O'Clements, Pitten, Sharland, Vickery (Vicary), Williams.

Area Interests:
Cardiff, Bampton, Bideford, Crediton, Wollaston, Somerset, Tidenham, Norway, Australia to Bristol.
minime
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 138



Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 16 January 05 02:01 GMT (UK) »

I would personally prefer something to nothing. Partially because I wonder if I didn't give enough info or if it's something impossible to come by.

Minime
Logged

Birchall, Cooper, Kearns, Hope, Desmarias
Scotland, England, Ireland, Canada?, France?
tallted
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 223


I've not edited my PROFILE yet


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 16 January 05 15:13 GMT (UK) »

I personally found that a negative answer will at times lead you in the right direction. Also it is very reassuring to hear people care enough to answer one way or another.
Ted
Logged

Surnames I am Interested in:
Dolan, Banks, Chambers, Bemi, Hills
Kazza
Welsh Lass
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1784


Looking into Holes


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 16 January 05 17:00 GMT (UK) »

Ted,

I agree,  a negative answer can force you to have a re-think.  The other thing I think is important is that new users are encouraged by finding people respond to them,  and even a negative answer,  if properly worded,  is useful in this.

It is only after I asked for some lookups in a particular census,  and recieved a negative answer that I discovered the date my branch of the family moved to Wales.   It forced me to look further afield,  and I found they had moved 50 years before family folk-lore had led me to believe.

Kazza.
Logged



Surname interests:
Clementsten, Hobson, Hole, Marden, O'Clements, Pitten, Sharland, Vickery (Vicary), Williams.

Area Interests:
Cardiff, Bampton, Bideford, Crediton, Wollaston, Somerset, Tidenham, Norway, Australia to Bristol.
Hackstaple
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2516


Family researcher


WWW
Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 16 January 05 17:05 GMT (UK) »

I post "negative" replies whenever I feel they will assist the member. As has been pointed out it is sometimes necessary to rethink a problem. Cool
Logged

Southern or Southan [Hereford , Monmouthshire & Glos], Jenkins, Meredith and Morgan [Monmouthshire and Glos.], Murrill, Damary, Damry, Ray, Lawrence [all Middx. & London], Nethway from Kenn or Yatton. Also Riley and Lyons in South Africa.
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
celia
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4484


W.C.O.A


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 16 January 05 18:46 GMT (UK) »

How strange i should come across this topic as to whether to reply to an unanswered mail. A while back i was idly going through some posting. I noticed quiet a lot of 0's especially in Scotland. One of the reasons some post go unanswered is that the poster is looking for a particular person. But have no dates at all only the names so i think these get ignored. I answered one mail saying i couldn't help, but did give some suggestions. The next thing was the replies started coming in.I thought it was just coincidence but i did it again and the same thing happened. So now i go for the 0 and start the ball rolling. I agree it might put newbies off if a post gets no replies but then again a newbie wont know that we need dates or other input.so it is up to us to explain in simple terms what they need  to do. After all thats what we are here for,to help others.

Celia
Logged

celia
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4484


W.C.O.A


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 16 January 05 19:07 GMT (UK) »

I have just noticed a member named Arranroots Grin is researching in Som,Hef Gls,Rad,Gla.& Mon. where is Hef,Rad, & Gla please Huh

Celia
Logged

Kazza
Welsh Lass
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1784


Looking into Holes


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 16 January 05 20:21 GMT (UK) »

Celia,

Well done,  RootsChat relys on people like you homing in on the poor neglected ones.

As to Hef,  Rad and Gla,  my guess woulf be Herefordshire,  Radnorshire and Glamorganshire.

Kazza.
Logged



Surname interests:
Clementsten, Hobson, Hole, Marden, O'Clements, Pitten, Sharland, Vickery (Vicary), Williams.

Area Interests:
Cardiff, Bampton, Bideford, Crediton, Wollaston, Somerset, Tidenham, Norway, Australia to Bristol.
Hackstaple
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2516


Family researcher


WWW
Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 16 January 05 20:53 GMT (UK) »

Hi Celia - the codes used by Arranroots are the Chapman County codes used by all family history societies and journals. Cool
Logged

Southern or Southan [Hereford , Monmouthshire & Glos], Jenkins, Meredith and Morgan [Monmouthshire and Glos.], Murrill, Damary, Damry, Ray, Lawrence [all Middx. & London], Nethway from Kenn or Yatton. Also Riley and Lyons in South Africa.
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Arranroots
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 9181


~ Grand Aunt Jenny ~


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 16 January 05 22:42 GMT (UK) »

Thanks for the replies, guys

I'm reassured that posting negative responses is not messing up the system, provided as Kazza says, they are carefully worded.  I don't mind someone telling me that my enquiry cannot  be answered without further info (for example).  It may even be that I am asking for something that doesn't exist, in which case it is kinder to put me out of my misery!!

The other thing is trying to answer a query that many others have read, but not responded to, often results in my not finding anything either.  It would save time if someone said "have looked for that and nothing found".  Although occasionally I will look anyway, just to be perverse!  Grin

As for Chapman codes. I'm sorry Celia, I was too lazy to type out the whole thing and am just hoping now that I used them correctly.  Could be embarrassing  Embarrassed

This site has been a great discovery and may it go from strength to strength.

Arranroots

 
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SOM: BIRD, BURT aka BROWN
HEF: BAUGH, LATHAM, CARTER, PRITCHARD
GLS: WEBB, WORKMAN, LATHAM, MALPUS
WIL: WEBB, SALTER
RAD: PRITCHARD, WILLIAMS
GLA: RYAN, KEARNEY, JONES, HARRY
MON: WEBB, MORGAN, WILLIAMS, JONES, BIRD
SCOTLAND: HASTINGS, CAMERON, KELSO, BUCHANAN, BETHUNE/ BEATON
IRELAND: RYAN (WATERFORD), KEARNEY, BOYLE (DUNDALK)
Berlin-Bob
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056


by My Daughter. Chatting to find her Roots !


Re: To reply or not to reply?
« Reply #14 on: Monday 17 January 05 07:43 GMT (UK) »

here is some more info. on Chapman Codes: http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=19831.0
Logged

Searching for Coleman, Moore, Kallnung in London; Margulies, Remenyi in E. Europe;
Ancestors of Hessie Stevenson-Coleman-Baxter (Ireland, 1861)
and, of course, any other ancestors for my web-site http://boco.rootschat.net

All Census Data included in this post is Crown Copyright (see: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk)
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.215:20