Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Sunday 12 October 08 04:38 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: FULL Search right now, www.Ancestry.co.uk today - free for two weeks

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Dorset
| | | |-+  Dorset Lookup Requests (Moderator: RootsChat)
| | | | |-+  james male
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author Topic: james male  (Read 619 times)
SWIPPYDO
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: james male
« Reply #30 on: Sunday 09 December 07 20:54 GMT (UK) »

thank you again for the latest info you have replied with. yes i agree with you it is almost definate that james 51/52 is my man. i suppose in a way it makes no difference to my life but you like to know these things, i now can see how the hounsells fit in, you have certanly cleared that one up. well now perhaps i can get on with the rest of the families in my tree i would like to thank all of you for all the help you have given, without all of you i may never have been able to find out.
swippydo
Wink :)wishing you all a merry christmas
Logged
SWIPPYDO
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: james male
« Reply #31 on: Monday 10 December 07 21:17 GMT (UK) »

hi have sat studing the info above and i am at a loss if this info is correct then where does my gr grandad james born in 1875 and his son james born in 1898 come in if mary was married to james davis in 1859  then who fathered james 1875
swippydo Huh Huh
Logged
AMBLY
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2971


Falkland Islands "Desire The Right"


Re: james male
« Reply #32 on: Monday 10 December 07 23:14 GMT (UK) »

Hi SWIPPYDOO

This is what we believe is the descendancy:

1) James Arthur MALE born 1851/52 (mother Mary Ann [UNKNOWN] widow of George MALE fruiterer); married: Mary Ann HOUNSELL in  1873, they had son:

2) James Arthur MALE born 1874. he married Charlotte Theresa S GARLAND in 1896, they had son:

3) James Albert MALE b 1898

Perhaps the fact that James Arthur MALE b 1851/1852 married a woman with the same apparent forename as his mother, is the confusing part!

The Mary Ann [UNKNOWN]  who married - we think (it's not proved!) James DAVIS in 1859, was the widow of George MALE the Fruiterer. It is this Mary Ann's ( illigitimate?) son, James Arthur MALE b 1851/52 who we think fathered James Arthur MALE b 1875.

If this all proves correct, then when widow Mary Ann MALE nee [UNKNOWN] remarried in 1859 to James DAVIS, he became the stepfather to her illigitimate son, James Arthur MALE b 1851/1852.

Hope this helps!

Cheers
AMBLY
Logged

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

"Now that we're all here, I'm not sure if we're all there...."
SWIPPYDO
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: james male
« Reply #33 on: Monday 10 December 07 23:33 GMT (UK) »

hi yes i relise that after i posted message this has been very confusing i am now in the midst of putting it all togeather i would like to thank all of the  people who have spent time helping me. the only sad thing about it all i dont know who james 51/52 dad was. might turn up i will be on here again i expect with more problems thanks again.
swippydo Cheesy
Logged
CaroleW
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9462



Re: james male
« Reply #34 on: Wednesday 12 December 07 22:43 GMT (UK) »

Quote
This is what we believe is the descendancy:

1) James Arthur MALE born 1851/52 (mother Mary Ann [UNKNOWN] widow of George MALE fruiterer); married: Mary Ann HOUNSELL in  1873, they had son:

2) James Arthur MALE born 1874. he married Charlotte Theresa S GARLAND in 1896, they had son:

3) James Albert MALE b 1898

So James Albert Male is connected to the new message posted

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,273364.0.html
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
SWIPPYDO
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: james male
« Reply #35 on: Wednesday 12 December 07 22:50 GMT (UK) »

yes i know the james born 1898 was my grandad, but as i said above did not know much about grandma or her family have sent for certificate but it hasnt come yet just thought some-one might be able to help
thanks
swippydo
Logged
CaroleW
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9462



Re: james male
« Reply #36 on: Wednesday 12 December 07 22:54 GMT (UK) »

Unless a Rootschatter has any personal knowledge of Phyllis Elliott, we would not be able to help with her parents names as she was born after the 1901 census
Logged

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.159:22