I don't know if anyone can help with this problem but in case someone can:- John DYMENT(or a variation of the name) married Honor FURSE in St Giles in the wood 12 Ap 1722 M051691 St Giles 1555-1743 They have 5 children baptised between 1722-1731.in St Giles in the Wood Next I have found a burial 29 Aug 1773 for Honor DYMOND and one for John DYMOND 2 May 1777 both St Giles in the Wood.
So far so good But in the Beaford register I have found 1748 John DYMOND & Jane SQUANCE Oct 29th Banns
Now this could be John and Honor's son John b 1723 but no Jane Squance has been found other than a Jane Isaacs b 1702 Beaford, who had married George SQUANCE in 1730 George died in 1835 so Jane could have married in 1748.
With out the complication of the Jane and John marriage I would have been confident to accept the Honor and John burials as being for John and Honor nee FURSE. but as you can see Jane b 1702 would be a reasonable age to marry John b 1699.
Do you have any suggestions how to resolve the situation? I would be grateful for any help with this problem Trees