|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Michael Inglefield 1787 Sussex (Read 152 times)
|
joolesbarr
RootsChat Extra
 Offline
Posts: 97
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
You were all so helpful with my last Inglefield query I thought I would test you all again.
I am looking for the Parents and place of birth of Michael Inglefield (Ingerfield and various other spellings), born abt 1787 in Sussex.
I know he married Sarah Martin in East Grinstead on the 9th May 1813. But when I have searched the only Inglefields I can find in East Grinstead are Michaels children and familys ( right up until 1901) I don't think he was born in East Grinstead, as there are no other Inglefields in East Grinstead, so where was he born and who were his parents. Where did the Ingerfields originate from.
Can anyone help.
Thank you all so much for your time
Jooles
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
joolesbarr
RootsChat Extra
Offline
Posts: 97
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
In the 1841 census he remarried Elizabeth so I know the year is about right but thinking
about it your right it doesn't say where he was born, just that he was living in East Grinstead, and
he was dead by the 1851 census. I just
presumed that back then people didn't travel far. Maybe I'll
need to re think.
Thanks for your thoughts
Jooles
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sillgen
RootsChat Marquessate
Offline
Posts: 5105
|
It does say "yes" for born in county in 1841. Would not be the first time that was wrong though! When did he marry Elizabeth? It does not show on the SMI. Could it be after 1837? Have you looked?
Andrea
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jane Masri
RootsChat Marquessate
Offline
Posts: 3340
My new twiglet, Rawia.
|
In the 1841 census he does say he was born Sussex...but that could be a fib  Also the enumerator has written actual ages rather than rounding them down, so at 51 his dob is about 1790.
It looks like he has died by 1851. There is a death reg. for Michael Inglefield Q4 1842, East Grinstead. Elizabeth is to be found with her son from her previous marriage;
1851 - East Grinstead HO107/1641/323/21
Michael Brooker Head wid 45 ag lab b. East Grinstead
Elizabeth Inglefield wid mother 67 Poor Relief b. East Grinstead
Benjamin Brooker 15 son Errand boy ditto
Henry Brooker 4 ditto
There are 2 possible first marriages for Elizabeth;
East Grinstead, West Sussex, 17 Apr 1803:
Thomas BROOKER
Elizabeth MITCHELL, botp (B)
East Grinstead, West Sussex, 18 Oct 1806:
James BROOKER
Elizabeth HUGGETT, botp (B)
But I rather think it's the second marriage to James as there is a baptismal entry on the IGI for a Michael Brooker 1809 East Grinstead s/o James & Elizabeth,
jane
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.ukResearching BRABY/BRAVERY in SURREY and SUSSEX PLEASE use the look-up requests page not a personal message. |
|
|
joolesbarr
RootsChat Extra
Offline
Posts: 97
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Thank you so much for that.
At least I can add Elizabeths maiden name in to my tree.
Jooles
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
forester
RootsChat Veteran
Offline
Posts: 758
|
When I was doing the look-ups on the last thread, I came across what could be the possible marriage of Michael and Elizabeth Brooker (formerly Huggett), but never got round to posting it, so here it is:
27th April 1840
Old Church, St Pancras, London
Michael Ingarfield
Elizabeth Brooker or Haggett
IGI Batch No. M047932
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
forester
RootsChat Veteran
Offline
Posts: 758
|
There is a James Brooker on the St Swithuns burial register, but no Thomas.
21st March 1830
James Brooker, age 51
of Ashurst Wood
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
joolesbarr
RootsChat Extra
Offline
Posts: 97
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Thats wonderful, thank you both
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
|
