Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Tuesday 07 October 08 15:16 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: New! FULL 1841 Census: England - Isle of Man - Wales  - Channel Islands Now online. No missing counties.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  Photograph Restoration & Dating. Conservation (Moderators: deadants, PrueM)
| | |-+  Could this be a woman?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Print
Author Topic: Could this be a woman?  (Read 1512 times)
Gadget
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 17389


My lovely Mum


WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 19:04 BST (UK) »

Been doing a bit of looking up on the web - facial characteristics and gender differences. We have to discount our perceptions which are based on all sorts of learned experiences, etc.  Shocked

I remember long ago  (some portrait class or other) about the prominence of the bit above the nose in men and absent in women. Think I said something about it in my first post. Rog refers to it as the brow ridge.  It's called the supercilary arch and this person doesn't have one - so I'm still saying it's a woman.

Indi - having probs finding an outfit for Daisy. Things are a bit limited in the Highlands  Undecided

Gadget

PS - love the jaunty hat, Dave  Smiley
Logged

Website: www.ancestral-tales.co.uk



My main Surname interests are on the Surname Interests Table  http://surname.rootschat.com/ and my website (above)

Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk
karenb
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 414



WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 19:52 BST (UK) »

No way - it's a guy Wink  I just can't fathom this being a woman despite the very feminine anatomy others have referred to.  I'll bet the nickname really did come from him being a beautiful boy.

I had a crush on a young lad when I was in my early teens and this picture and discussion has brought back some memories of him.  He was a slight, smooth-skinned boy about 15 at that time and had the most beautiful face and the longest eye-lashes I've ever seen (would make any woman envious).  His real name was Steve but everyone just called him "Lashes" - poor guy.  ... and he had full lips like a girl also.  Wink 

I lost touch with him for several decades and ran into him again about 5 years ago.  He would have been about 40 and was on a sailboat in shorts and no shirt.  He still looked incredibly feminine with very shapely legs (and still has the lashes) and I swear he didn't have a hair on his chest, face or legs.  If the hair on his head hadn't been graying he would have still looked like a young lad and if he wore some make-up and put on woman's clothes I don't think anyone would have noticed that it is a man.

Anyways, enough said.  Wink  I just think there are some men out there that happen to have extreme feminine features and think your Daisy could well be a man despite the woman's nose bridge and neck etc.

I am terribly curious however to find what he or she is so I'll cross my fingers that you can solve the mystery.

Karen
Logged

Perry - Tipperary, Wiltshire & Ontario
Gibbs - Buckinghamshire & Ontario
Cowan - Tipperary & Ontario
Bell - Glenavy, Ireland & Ontario
Drury - England & Ontario
Ritchie - Scotland & Ontario
Glover - Ireland, Edinburgh & Thorah/Brock Twp. Ontario
indiapaleale
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1382


Me and Him


WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 21:47 BST (UK) »

I've been looking on the 1900 US census for Daisy....but no such luck...However, there are 2 families  in Osborne County, Kansas named Padgett.....but neither family has a member named Daisy or anything like Daisy.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Will look some more   Cry Cry Cry

Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
PaulaToo
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Online Online

Posts: 2371


Me 'n Gerry


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 22:02 BST (UK) »

First thought before anything else...
Oh no, not another b Paget/Pagett/Padget/Padgett/Pachit............
Last weeks Scavenger hunt oh lor...................

Second thoughts....
Hang on, wasn't 'Daisy' used at some time like 'Pansy' and 'Nancy' for effeminate (not necessarily gay) chaps.
Logged

Bartlett/Henley on Thames
Caponhurst/Buckinghamshire and?
Denchfield/North Marston/Bucks
Webb/Winchester
Mathias/Pembroke/Pembroke Dock
Smith/Portsmouth/Portsea
Purchas/Bucks and?
Olliffe/Bucks
little meg
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1891



Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #34 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:07 BST (UK) »


I finally figured out what the actors name was.  I went to bed, lay there thinking  and thinking, you know, 'whats the name of that song' kind of thing.
Anyway it came to me.
I lay there, wondering if I would remember it in the morning, or should I get up and scribble it down  Roll Eyes, so opted for saying his name over and over again until I fell asleep. Grin

Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe, Rob Lowe  Wink

Check out the site.
http://www.starpulse.com/Actors/Lowe,_Rob/

Curious as to whether anyone else thinks there is a likeness.


Margaret
Logged

Please scan all pics at 300-600 DPI for restoration purposes, thankyou.

Simpson-Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Overend-Sutton, Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Whitaker - Cononley/Yorkshire, Pickard - Silsden/Yorkshire, Howarth - Skipton/Yorkshire and Lancashire, Heaton-Yorkshire, Preston-Yorkshire, Myers-Yorkshire & Australia, Wild-Yorkshire & Australia. Storey-Middlesex/Australia
Lones
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1908


Dad & Mum


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:15 BST (UK) »

Hi Margaret  Smiley

There is a likeness, but this guy is better looking, really pretty in fact.  Rob is more manly..... But they are similar, glad it came to you, nothing more annoying.  Hope you slept well after all that  Wink Grin Grin

Lones

Logged

Please feel free to alter or improve any restorations or colourisations submitted by me for the benefit of the Postee and their memories

Smith, Warwick Shire
Ashwell, Buckminster Leicester
Brown, Kent
OBrien/Brien, Cork
Dunstan, Stithians Corwall
Beard, Stithians Corwall
Penman, Midlothian, Perth or Fife
Dick, Fife
Ruddock, Staindrop Durham
Willis, Ingleton Durham
Gibbon, Kirkby Ravensworth
Lazenby, Middleton Yorkshire
Bradley, London
Ware, London
Pink, Bath
PaulaToo
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Online Online

Posts: 2371


Me 'n Gerry


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #36 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:18 BST (UK) »

Well yes, I can see a likeness too, Rob has more chin, but apart from that.....
Logged

Bartlett/Henley on Thames
Caponhurst/Buckinghamshire and?
Denchfield/North Marston/Bucks
Webb/Winchester
Mathias/Pembroke/Pembroke Dock
Smith/Portsmouth/Portsea
Purchas/Bucks and?
Olliffe/Bucks
karenb
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 414



WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #37 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:24 BST (UK) »

Dear indiapaleale,

If Daisy was a male then it was certainly a nickname.  I honestly don't think any mother would have christened a son with that name.  This of course brings a problem being a nickname - as a male he could have been a simple David or had any male name in the world.  As a female Daisy also wouldn't likely be a Christian name at that time although not completely improbable.  It certainly sounds like a nickname and regardless of gender is probably not the birthname noted on any census.

Karen
Logged

Perry - Tipperary, Wiltshire & Ontario
Gibbs - Buckinghamshire & Ontario
Cowan - Tipperary & Ontario
Bell - Glenavy, Ireland & Ontario
Drury - England & Ontario
Ritchie - Scotland & Ontario
Glover - Ireland, Edinburgh & Thorah/Brock Twp. Ontario
meles
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2917



WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #38 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:25 BST (UK) »

It's a fella!

Trust me, I move in androgynous circles.

meles

Logged

Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk
Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk
Harrison: London; Pollock
Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx
Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk
Rogers: London; Bartlett: London
Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants
Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
little meg
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1891



Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #39 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:25 BST (UK) »

Yeah, Robs chin is pretty major in comparison  Grin

I have a pic of a young man, with smooth complexion, will search it up and put it up, unfortunately it is not an original.

Could not the photo have been sent by a Daisy Undecided

Margaret
Logged

Please scan all pics at 300-600 DPI for restoration purposes, thankyou.

Simpson-Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Overend-Sutton, Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Whitaker - Cononley/Yorkshire, Pickard - Silsden/Yorkshire, Howarth - Skipton/Yorkshire and Lancashire, Heaton-Yorkshire, Preston-Yorkshire, Myers-Yorkshire & Australia, Wild-Yorkshire & Australia. Storey-Middlesex/Australia
little meg
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1891



Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #40 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:38 BST (UK) »

here is a pic I have in my collection - unnamed.
Unfortunately it was done by the printers for my book and I did give it an ever so slight gausian blur to remove the lines of the printer. 
Not a brilliant pic but think it shows a smooth complexion and no sideburns.
photo taken circa 1884-1888

Aunt has original Roll Eyes

Margaret


* young_bloke_1884_1888.jpg (263.37 KB, 519x800 - viewed 99 times.)
Logged

Please scan all pics at 300-600 DPI for restoration purposes, thankyou.

Simpson-Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Overend-Sutton, Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Whitaker - Cononley/Yorkshire, Pickard - Silsden/Yorkshire, Howarth - Skipton/Yorkshire and Lancashire, Heaton-Yorkshire, Preston-Yorkshire, Myers-Yorkshire & Australia, Wild-Yorkshire & Australia. Storey-Middlesex/Australia
nickgc
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 463


GGF J. James McLellan 1864-1908


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:46 BST (UK) »

Little Meg,

I now wish I had made my reply about thinking it looked like Rob Lowe yesterday when this thread had only 4 or 5 posts...would have saved you from some tossing & turning.

He also reminds me of a fellow I knew in high school.  Good looking, but certainly nothing non-masculine about him.

Can we see the signature on the back?  Here are some possibilities:  He gave the pic to Daisy and she signed it to let everyone know it (and by implication, HE) was hers; he signed the photo "To" her.

Nick

Logged

McLellan - Inverness
Greer - Renfrewshire
Manson - Aberdeen & Orkney
Simpson - Hereford, Devon, etc.
Flett - Orkney
Chisholm - Scotland
Wishart - Orkney
Shand - Aberdeen
Pirie - Aberdeen
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1472


information Crown Copyright, from www.nation


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #42 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:55 BST (UK) »

I think it's a man



* Daisy_Padgett_2.jpg (14.81 KB, 220x355 - viewed 91 times.)
Logged

"This information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"
little meg
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1891



Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday 13 May 08 23:59 BST (UK) »

Thanks Nick Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Tongue
Logged

Please scan all pics at 300-600 DPI for restoration purposes, thankyou.

Simpson-Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Overend-Sutton, Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Whitaker - Cononley/Yorkshire, Pickard - Silsden/Yorkshire, Howarth - Skipton/Yorkshire and Lancashire, Heaton-Yorkshire, Preston-Yorkshire, Myers-Yorkshire & Australia, Wild-Yorkshire & Australia. Storey-Middlesex/Australia
Ruskie
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Online Online

Posts: 2853


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #44 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 00:01 BST (UK) »

I think this is a male.

If the name "Daisy" wasn't written on the back of the photo, I think this person would be accepted as a male.

I think he's just pretty and young. He has a slightly haughty air about him, and looks 'posh' but ..... with that shabby unbuttoned suit. Interesting.

He's going to look like a very butch girl when you put him in a dress and a bonnet  Grin
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.182:21