Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Saturday 11 October 08 16:32 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Not only is RootsChat totally free, but you can have FREE WEBSPACE  too for your family history or local history webpages.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  Photograph Restoration & Dating. Conservation (Moderators: deadants, PrueM)
| | |-+  Could this be a woman?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Print
Author Topic: Could this be a woman?  (Read 1533 times)
willow154
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1424


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #60 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 11:20 BST (UK) »

Just looked at three photos taken over past four years, changes happening , but it's the last year (between 16 and 17) that has shown marked difference. In some it's later as we know.
Nose, forehead, body shape has all changed - completely! Adams apple much more marked in last year.
I'd scan the photos, but he'd be none too pleased - you know what they're like at that age Wink Grin
Paulene Smiley
Logged
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3078


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #61 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 11:23 BST (UK) »

Well, I say it's a young Rob Lowe dressed up in period costume Wink

http://www.perfectpeople.net/photo-picture-image/89222/rob-lowe.htm

http://www.perfectpeople.net/photo-picture-image/93654/rob-lowe.htm

Anna
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
little meg
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1899



Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #62 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 11:35 BST (UK) »

well I am glad you agree he looks like Rob Lowe,
but chin still obvious and Rob looks like he has plucked his eyebrows since he was 14  Shocked

Margaret
Logged

Please scan all pics at 300-600 DPI for restoration purposes, thankyou.

Simpson-Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Overend-Sutton, Kildwick,Yorkshire & Australia, Whitaker - Cononley/Yorkshire, Pickard - Silsden/Yorkshire, Howarth - Skipton/Yorkshire and Lancashire, Heaton-Yorkshire, Preston-Yorkshire, Myers-Yorkshire & Australia, Wild-Yorkshire & Australia. Storey-Middlesex/Australia
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3078


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #63 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 11:41 BST (UK) »


Rob looks like he has plucked his eyebrows since he was 14  Shocked


He does, doesn't he!

Obviously what I said about him being Rob Lowe was tongue-in-cheek, but I do think the photo is of a young man.  Some of the young guys who work for me (16-18 yrs old) are still quite baby-faced, without pronounced brow ridges, jawlines or Adam's apples.  They may be wondering why I am scrutinising them so carefully this morning Cheesy

Anna
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
Isles
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 516


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #64 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 12:41 BST (UK) »

I think this is a male.

If the name "Daisy" wasn't written on the back of the photo, I think this person would be accepted as a male.

I think he's just pretty and young. He has a slightly haughty air about him, and looks 'posh' but ..... with that shabby unbuttoned suit. Interesting.

He's going to look like a very butch girl when you put him in a dress and a bonnet  Grin

Careful Ruskie.  Indi doesn't like the use of the word 'butch'
Logged

Burness; Dickson; Moncur; Bowman
indiapaleale
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1382


Me and Him


WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #65 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 13:03 BST (UK) »

Isles,
You are correct - I don't like that word "butch" I find it low class and common......and it reflects a certain homophobia.

Indi
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
indiapaleale
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1382


Me and Him


WWW
Re: Could this be a woman?
« Reply #66 on: Wednesday 14 May 08 13:06 BST (UK) »

I want to thank you all for your ideas about Daisy.....I'm going to check out the 1920 census as Gadget suggests - looks like it could be promising.

I will lock this now but will post a new thread if I can nail down some positive news of Daisy Padget

Grin Grin Grin Grin
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.688:21