Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Thursday 16 October 08 21:43 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: RootsChat is totally free of charge, and always will be. Please tell others about your RootsChat.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  Photograph Restoration & Dating. Conservation (Moderators: deadants, PrueM)
| | |-+  Would these be widow's weeds
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Would these be widow's weeds  (Read 477 times)
acookey
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 155


My grand daughter's 1st birthday


Would these be widow's weeds
« on: Wednesday 14 May 08 23:40 BST (UK) »

Hi

Can anyone date this photo from the clothes she is wearing.  The photo is of my gggrandmother Katherine Pasley.  She looks quite young, but it is possible her husband died early, so I wondered whether those were mourning clothes from about the 1840s.

Annette


* Katherinepasleyv2.jpg (141.68 KB, 582x733 - viewed 162 times.)
Logged

Cooke, Aust. England
Russell, Aust. Enland
McMinn, Ireland
Gee, Ireland
Crump, London
Bowen (Bohan), Ireland
Seage, Ireland
Smith, Aust.
Dore, Ireland
Pasley, Ireland
Simmonds, England
chinakay
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 4100


Our housegoof


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 15 May 08 00:16 BST (UK) »

Hello Annette....what a fabulous, fabulous old photo! It's truly a fine specimen!

It seems to me to be an ambrotype, a photo devoped directly onto glass. It's in a decorative and protective case, and the whole thing looks in very good condition. Ambrotypes were produced from about 1855 to 1865, so there's a good clue for a date.

The clothing and hair style fit well with this timeframe also. Being a black & white photo it's hard to tell if she is wearing mourning, but she could well be. I would guess it may be a later stage of mourning, as she is showing some lighter coloured trim and lace, and the ties on her bonnet are lighter as well.

As for the 1840s...commercial photography didn't start until I think 1849, so that would be a bit early.

You may have other opinions on whether it's mourning clothing, and I hope you get some nice restores on the photo...it doesn't need much but our restorers love to play with beautiful photos like this one.

Cheers,
China
Logged

Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull
Dave Hall
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 715



Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 15 May 08 00:29 BST (UK) »

Tidy from me
Dave


* widowsweeds.JPG (160.53 KB, 958x1216 - viewed 151 times.)
Logged

HALL,PITTS, RAISTRICK,BRADLEY,FEATHER,HENDY,RAMSAY,BENTHAM,CARRINGTON,DODGSON,FLUEN,ILEY,CLAPHAM,BOLLARD,WOODYER,WEBB,TURTON,RUDDOCK
Please feel free to alter/adjust any of my work
PrueM
Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6089



WWW
Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 15 May 08 00:55 BST (UK) »

Hi Annette  Smiley
Everything China has said is spot on, except to say that ambrotypes were not invented until the mid 1850s, so if this is an ambrotype then it would be no earlier than that.
It is a beautiful photo in wonderful condition  Smiley

Prue
Logged

Paper and Photograph Conservator
I live in NSW, and am researching:
BALFOUR (Derry) – BIGG (Kent) – BONSALL (DBY, NTT, CHS) – BRISBANE (Fife) – DANKS (STS) – DOBSON (BRK) – FRANCIS (ESS) – GOODE (HAM) – HAYNES (Cork) – INGRAM (MDX, SOM) – LANGWORTHY (Jersey, DEV) – MCKAY (Fife, Aberdeen, Banff, Moray, Inverness) – MORRISH (LND) – NANCARROW (CON) – OGILVIE (Moray, LND) – STRATHDEE (Banff) – SWAN (Fife) – WOOD (LND)
acookey
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 155


My grand daughter's 1st birthday


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 15 May 08 02:53 BST (UK) »

Hi

Thank you all for  your input.  Much appreciated.

Annette
Logged

Cooke, Aust. England
Russell, Aust. Enland
McMinn, Ireland
Gee, Ireland
Crump, London
Bowen (Bohan), Ireland
Seage, Ireland
Smith, Aust.
Dore, Ireland
Pasley, Ireland
Simmonds, England
chinakay
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 4100


Our housegoof


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 15 May 08 04:58 BST (UK) »

It is beautiful, isn't it?

What is she holding? At first I took it to be an umbrella, but now I don't think so......

Cheers,
Chia
Logged

Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull
Lones
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1912


Dad & Mum


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 15 May 08 05:01 BST (UK) »

What is she holding? At first I took it to be an umbrella, but now I don't think so......


Hi China, It's either an umbrella and a short stick, or some kind of wierd deflated bagpipes!!  Wink Grin Grin Grin

Lones  Cheesy Cool
Logged

Please feel free to alter or improve any restorations or colourisations submitted by me for the benefit of the Postee and their memories

Smith, Warwick Shire
Ashwell, Buckminster Leicester
Brown, Kent
OBrien/Brien, Cork
Dunstan, Stithians Corwall
Beard, Stithians Corwall
Penman, Midlothian, Perth or Fife
Dick, Fife
Ruddock, Staindrop Durham
Willis, Ingleton Durham
Gibbon, Kirkby Ravensworth
Lazenby, Middleton Yorkshire
Bradley, London
Ware, London
Pink, Bath
geniecolgan
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Online Online

Posts: 542


Behold! Genie/Icarus by Pels


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 15 May 08 05:17 BST (UK) »

It is beautiful, isn't it?

What is she holding? At first I took it to be an umbrella, but now I don't think so......

Cheers,
Chia

Tis a wonderful picture.

I think the lady is holding a parasol with a folding handle  Undecided
Logged

Colgan, Scott, Templeton in Northern Antrim
Colgan in Saskatchewan, Canada
Durrant in Herts & Middlesex
Ford,Smith in Hammersmith, Fulham, Brentford
Whiting in Berkshire
Weller in Sussex and London
Walker in the 24th of Foot, (Canada, Ireland, India and South Africa) and London
acookey
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 155


My grand daughter's 1st birthday


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 15 May 08 05:59 BST (UK) »

Hi all

Yes when I blew it up on high resolution it is definitely an umbrella or parasol with a folding handle.

This is my gggrandmother, Katherine Pasley, Ireland.  She was married to Rev William Pasley, and family history has that she was a Countess before she married?Huh?

I have another photo that is not quite as sharp.  Both of these are scans from my sister.  The first one was a photo of the original, and this one is a scan of the original.  Do you think it is the same person?  I have done a little tweaking as it was very faded.  It certainly looks like as if it was probably the same process as the first.

Annette


* redboxladyv2.jpg (213.62 KB, 816x1011 - viewed 123 times.)
Logged

Cooke, Aust. England
Russell, Aust. Enland
McMinn, Ireland
Gee, Ireland
Crump, London
Bowen (Bohan), Ireland
Seage, Ireland
Smith, Aust.
Dore, Ireland
Pasley, Ireland
Simmonds, England
PrueM
Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6089



WWW
Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 15 May 08 07:08 BST (UK) »

Hi Annette,
You are a doubly lucky thing, having two such gorgeous pictures in your family!

I would think the second photo was taken around the mid 1850s, which is what I was also thinking for the first one (but that one might still be a little later).  I don't think they're the same lady though, just can't see enough detail in the face of the first lady to be certain.  Undecided
Logged

Paper and Photograph Conservator
I live in NSW, and am researching:
BALFOUR (Derry) – BIGG (Kent) – BONSALL (DBY, NTT, CHS) – BRISBANE (Fife) – DANKS (STS) – DOBSON (BRK) – FRANCIS (ESS) – GOODE (HAM) – HAYNES (Cork) – INGRAM (MDX, SOM) – LANGWORTHY (Jersey, DEV) – MCKAY (Fife, Aberdeen, Banff, Moray, Inverness) – MORRISH (LND) – NANCARROW (CON) – OGILVIE (Moray, LND) – STRATHDEE (Banff) – SWAN (Fife) – WOOD (LND)
PrueM
Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6089



WWW
Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 15 May 08 07:16 BST (UK) »

...on second thoughts  Grin  there is quite a similarity between them when you view the faces side by side.  If they are the same person, though, there's probably only a maximum of 10 years between the second picture and the first picture being taken, and she seems to have aged a great deal in that time  Undecided


* annette-ambros-RC.jpg (57.29 KB, 400x224 - viewed 118 times.)
Logged

Paper and Photograph Conservator
I live in NSW, and am researching:
BALFOUR (Derry) – BIGG (Kent) – BONSALL (DBY, NTT, CHS) – BRISBANE (Fife) – DANKS (STS) – DOBSON (BRK) – FRANCIS (ESS) – GOODE (HAM) – HAYNES (Cork) – INGRAM (MDX, SOM) – LANGWORTHY (Jersey, DEV) – MCKAY (Fife, Aberdeen, Banff, Moray, Inverness) – MORRISH (LND) – NANCARROW (CON) – OGILVIE (Moray, LND) – STRATHDEE (Banff) – SWAN (Fife) – WOOD (LND)
acookey
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 155


My grand daughter's 1st birthday


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 15 May 08 07:40 BST (UK) »

Hullo all

When I saw the first picture, I though she had her eyes shut, and wondered if she was blind.  But when I blew it up, I could see they were half closed, just like the person in the second picture.  She may have had a sight problem.  It is that that makes me think they are the same person.

Thanks, any other opinions, gratefully received.

Annette

Logged

Cooke, Aust. England
Russell, Aust. Enland
McMinn, Ireland
Gee, Ireland
Crump, London
Bowen (Bohan), Ireland
Seage, Ireland
Smith, Aust.
Dore, Ireland
Pasley, Ireland
Simmonds, England
chinakay
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Online Online

Posts: 4100


Our housegoof


Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #12 on: Friday 16 May 08 02:27 BST (UK) »

The second one (these are sooo fabulous!) might be a memorial portrait.

I do remember reading, although naturally I can't find it now, that the arched shape of the matte indicates a photo that was intended as a memorial of someone who has passed on. Usually reprinted some time later.

I wonder if the shape is supposed to be reminiscent of a gravestone...?

Just a thought. Cheers,
China
Logged

Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull
LoneyBones
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 761


I believe in freedom of speech.


WWW
Re: Would these be widow's weeds
« Reply #13 on: Friday 16 May 08 04:06 BST (UK) »

I think the clothes sugest about 1856 earliest to 1862 latest. The split sleeves of the second photo are later than the full sleeves and cape of the first photo. But I do think they are more likely to be mother (photo 1.) and daughter. (photo 2.)
Leonie.
Logged

ENNIS-Yeatman-Cooper-Papps. 
ENNIS-Thomas-Bonnin-Aldridge.
ENNIS-Davis.
JONES-Walton-Instant
JONES-Goodwin-Parker

LOST: Elizabeth Anne Balfour DAVIS. First seen aboard ship STATELY, 1851, heading for New Zealand.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.206:21