Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Thursday 21 August 08 05:35 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Add and search your names to the all new RootsChat SURNAME INTERESTS TABLE today

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  Photograph Restoration & Dating. Conservation (Moderators: deadants, PrueM)
| | |-+  Could this have been taken in 1892?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Could this have been taken in 1892?  (Read 861 times)
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Could this have been taken in 1892?
« on: Friday 23 May 08 06:28 BST (UK) »

This photograph was found when a distant cousin was helping clear out the family home after his mother's death.

Unfortunately his dad had commenced a decline into dementia at the time and could only remember it was "family".

It was taken in Australia, obviously in a studio because of the background "prop", and we are hoping it show members of my mother's paternal family.  Pinning down a date would be a good starting point.  I don't remember being told there was anything written or printed on it which would help identify either the place or the photographer.

If someone could please help I would be very grateful.


* family_resized.jpg (40.95 KB, 283x426 - viewed 349 times.)
Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
chinakay
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3830


Our housegoof


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #1 on: Friday 23 May 08 13:59 BST (UK) »

Hello Irish, welcome to Rootschat Cheesy

The hairstyles on the women is the big clue to the date of this photo, I think. A style called the Pompadour started in about the 1892-1895 timeframe according to our resident expert on hair and clothing styles, Old Rowley. The woman on the left of the photo is wearing a classic pompadour, so this photo could well have been taken around the date you suggest.

Hair and clothing styles would likely have been fairly parallel with styles in Britain and America, as ladies were heavily influenced by the fashion magazines and adopted whatever was in those magazines at the time.

You may have other opinions, of course, but 1892 is a good bet.

If you would like any restoration done to this lovely old photo, you should scan it at a higher resolution, 300-600dpi, and post a larger version of it.

Cheers,
China
Logged

Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull
toni*
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 5698



Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #2 on: Friday 23 May 08 14:19 BST (UK) »

The leg-of-mutton sleeve is constructed with a full top that is gathered into the armhole. The fabric then tapers gradually to tuck in closely at the wrist, which gives the sleeve the bell-shaped outline, just like a leg of mutton. This type of sleeve was first seen in 1824, but eventually made a comeback in the swinging days of the 1890s.

also - from wikipedia:~

 Early 1890s dresses consisted of a tight bodice with the skirt gathered at the waist and falling more naturally over the hips and undergarments than in previous years.

The mid 1890s introduced leg o'mutton sleeves, which grew in size each year until they disappeared in about 1896. During the same period of the mid '90s, skirts took on an A-line silhouette that was almost bell-like. The late 1890s returned to the tighter sleeves often with small puffs or ruffles capping the shoulder but fitted to the wrist. Skirts took on a trumpet shape, fitting more closely over the hip and flaring just above the knee. Corsets in the 1890s helped define the hourglass figure as immortalized by artist Charles Dana Gibson. In the very late 1890s the corset elongated, giving the women a slight S-curve silhouette that would be popular well into the Edwardian era.

if you go to wikipedia here:~
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1890s_in_fashion

there are some images further down the page

Logged

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular condition causing weakness of the muscles.
SMA is the biggest genetic killer of children under the age of 2 years
1 in 40 of you carry the gene that passes this conditon on
There is no current treatment
JTSMA.ORG.UK  FSMA.ORG  PROJECTCURESMA.ORG

Tomorrow is too late

Holman - Cornwall, Wojciechowskyj - Kiev Ukraine, Bentley - Bradford/Leicester, Taylor - Kent/Sussex, Punnett - Sussex, Richards - Leicester, Vinton - Cornwall, Beer - Devon
charles w
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 561



Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #3 on: Friday 23 May 08 19:53 BST (UK) »

This may give you a better view.


* Irish_1_Medium.jpg (34.19 KB, 406x600 - viewed 295 times.)
Logged

POSTEES: If possible, PLEASE, scan your images at 300 - 600 dpi, for both ease of restoration and best results
RESTORERS: Feel free to change/improve/colour any restorations posted by myself.  Acknowledgment would be appreciated.
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #4 on: Friday 23 May 08 22:46 BST (UK) »

Thank you everyone for your help.  This is definitely becoming more exciting, and it seems more likely every minute that this is indeed the family I hoped it would be.

If I could impose on your good will a little longer?

My mother's grandmother, Ellen, was born in 1846.  Could she be the lady on the left?  The eldest daughter, Elizabeth, was born in 1865.  Lady on the right?  The lass sitting on the chair has been tentatively identified as the second daughter, Julia, born 1871.  I am lousy at guessing ages but my incredibly inaccurate eye seems to indicate these ages fit, again, with 1892.

The family was definitely far from wealthy and would only have had studio photos taken for very special occasions.  A son, William, was married in Ipswich (Qld) in 1892, which gave me a possible occasion and the year as a guessing point.  Also, "Elizabeth" is holding a photo which appears to be of a man but I can't blow the image up enough to be sure.  The father was in Dunwich Benevolent Asylum, had been admitted in 1889; could the second photo be of him? 

I would love to see a restoration of this photo and will improve resolution and repost as suggested.

There is another point about this mysterious photo too, but I'll leave that until later.  One type of question at a time, I think?

Thank you again for your time and interest and invaluable assistance.
Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
chinakay
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3830


Our housegoof


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #5 on: Friday 23 May 08 23:35 BST (UK) »

It's entirely possible the women in the photo could be the ages you're hoping for...the woman on the left looks about 50-ish, and the one on the right maybe 30ish...it's in the right time frame.

The picture she is holding...if you put the photo back on the scanner and isolate the picture (draw a box around it) and scan it as high as your scanner will go...I have had good results this way...worth a try...

Cheers,
China
Logged

Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #6 on: Friday 23 May 08 23:54 BST (UK) »

China, thanks for that suggestion.  It's amazing how obvious things can be when someone points them out, isn't it?

I'll give the high resolution scan of "a box" later and post it with the improved resolution photo, if that's OK?

Since I've been involved with genealogy I've had a much clearer picture of the phrase "your blood is worth bottling".

Thank you again.
Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 25 May 08 01:12 BST (UK) »

Here is the resized photo at 300dpi.  Sorry I took so long - other "duties" have dared to interfere with my genealogical pursuits!!!!

If a restoration is at all possible, it would be lovely to see.

Thank you.


* family_300.jpg (448.31 KB, 1000x1506 - viewed 259 times.)
Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
Niksmum
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 3202


baby you can drive my car....


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 25 May 08 02:17 BST (UK) »

my one

Irene


* family_300irish1a.jpg (122.98 KB, 650x982 - viewed 246 times.)
Logged

Please refer to posting and scanning tuts at top of the board before posting.

Feel free to use any restores done by me. An acknowledgment would be appreciated

Buckinghamshire-Babbs
Somerset-Smith
Woolwich-Elliott
London-Elliott, Hare,Baker
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 25 May 08 03:33 BST (UK) »

Irene, how lovely.

Thank you soooooo much!!!  It feels fantastic to look at the photo and feel it has been taken very recently.

Now - having worked such visual miracles, can you make them speak to confirm their identities?  That is getting close to my dearest wish at the moment!!!!!!!

Deeply, deeply grateful.

Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 25 May 08 05:12 BST (UK) »

Back again after trying to scan particular segments of the photo to send.

As was suggested, I tried to "box" and scan what looks like a photo on the extreme right.  Unfortunately the image doesn't seem to improve at all.  I can't remember exactly how we received the photo in the first place, but maybe what we have is just a print of a scan of the original and not a "proper" copy?   Our scanner is limited to 1200dpi and that might make a difference too.

I also tried boxing and scanning the other two articles being held so obviously but again, no success.

When my "cousin" returns from his lengthy tour of Europe and North America I'll contact him and ask for an actual copy of the photo rather than an electronic image.  Would that give better scanner results?

Having come so far I now find it frustrating in the extreme that I can't take that extra step forward!!!!

Will get back in touch with the segments once that wanderer returns to his home base!!!
Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
Deb D
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 221


I'm not over 40 ... I'm 39.95 plus tax!


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 25 May 08 07:10 BST (UK) »

Ooooh, IrishOrigins, ... you've got me curious now, and I love puzzles (LOL mustn't we all? we're here, aren't we?).

What was the other "mystery" to do with this photo?  Smiley
Logged

I live in Sydney, Australia, and I'm researching: -
Powell
Tatham
Dunbar
Dixon
Mackwood
Kinnear
Mitchell
Morgan
Delves
Anderson
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 25 May 08 08:09 BST (UK) »

Hi Deb.

In my excitement at seeing a "new" old photo, I almost forgot I'd mentioned the other mystery.

At the risk of making an utter ass of myself I'll now explain.

Go to either of the untouched original scans I posted or to the black and white version that Charles provided - they all give clear representations of my mystery.

On the wall above the girl sitting on the chair, and to our left of the taller lass standing, there is a clear but vague image which to me looks like an Asian man with a cap and a high necked jacket.  Not modern day Asian, but definitely Asian in flavour.

When I first saw it I thought it was my Chinese great-grandfather putting in an appearance to let me know it really was his wife and family I was looking at.  If only!!!!!

For a while I floated around in a WOW cloud of euphoria and "what ifs" but common sense eventually prevailed and I thudded back to earth and started thinking more logically, even though those possibilities are a lot less exciting to consider.

The most logical thought was that the image was created by having another photo in the frame behind this one.  I asked my cousin about this but he said the photo was on its own when he found it, and he didn't mention other photos from the same era being in the house.

Then I realised that the lass on the right was holding what looked like a photo, and my eagle eyes "found" that the outline on that photo seemed to match the image on the wall.  My question then was, could this have been the photo which had been stored behind the group, causing the image to appear?

I also realised that my rather vivid imagination can create something I want to see from almost nothing, but I'm still convinced that the image is real and not something I've conjured up.  It will be interesting to see what other people think.

Check it out, Deb, and see what you think.

Shall I throw down the gauntlet of challenge?  No need, I know, and I can't wait to hear reactions.

I just hope that the consensus doesn't come up with the explanation that it is all staining combined with wishful thinking and an all too vivid imagination!!!!





Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
Deb D
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 221


I'm not over 40 ... I'm 39.95 plus tax!


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 25 May 08 15:53 BST (UK) »

Now ... that is odd.  I wasn't sure I was looking at the right thing in the larger copy ... it stood out more when I looked at the smaller ones.  But I don't think I can say, definitely ... cos I suspect my imagination's a bit like yours!

Shocked
Logged

I live in Sydney, Australia, and I'm researching: -
Powell
Tatham
Dunbar
Dixon
Mackwood
Kinnear
Mitchell
Morgan
Delves
Anderson
IrishOrigins
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Could this have been taken in 1892?
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 25 May 08 23:04 BST (UK) »

Glad you could see him too, Deb.  Now I can loudly claim it's not just me. Tongue

I wonder if I'll ever solve it?



Logged

Byrnes, Wexford.
O'Brien, Hannigan, Waterford & Tipperary
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.355:20