Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Sunday 12 October 08 00:59 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: Search the 1891 Wales Census - find them today.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  The Common Room
| | |-+  "Interred without the service"
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: "Interred without the service"  (Read 521 times)
Galium
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 560


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


"Interred without the service"
« on: Thursday 17 July 08 17:11 BST (UK) »

I came across this note on a burial in 1850 in a C of E register.  Does anyone know what reasons there might be for such a burial?

The man in question was reported in the newspaper as having died of apoplexy - so not a suicide.

Logged
meles
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2917



WWW
Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 17 July 08 17:12 BST (UK) »

He might have been a non-conformist?

meles
Logged

Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk
Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk
Harrison: London; Pollock
Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx
Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk
Rogers: London; Bartlett: London
Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants
Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Galium
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 560


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 17 July 08 17:19 BST (UK) »

Thanks.  If he belongs to the family I think he does, he was baptised a Catholic - but the church he was baptised in had a burial ground, and he was still living nearby  Sad .

He doesn't appear to have had a death certificate either.
Logged
meles
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2917



WWW
Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 17 July 08 17:23 BST (UK) »

Hmm  Undecided the plot thickens...

meles
Logged

Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk
Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk
Harrison: London; Pollock
Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx
Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk
Rogers: London; Bartlett: London
Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants
Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
JenB
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1728


They're in there somewhere....


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 17 July 08 17:40 BST (UK) »

If he was Roman Catholic, then the Funeral Mass would have taken place at his R.C. church. But if there was no R.C. burial ground nearby he would have then been buried without ceremony at the Anglican churchyard.
Logged

Reed - Durham
Elsdon - Durham & Northumberland
Swalwell - Durham and Northumberland

All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
JenB
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1728


They're in there somewhere....


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 17 July 08 17:50 BST (UK) »

But if there was no R.C. burial ground nearby he would have then been buried without ceremony at the Anglican churchyard.

Apologies, I just re-read your post, and see that there was a burial ground at his Roman Catholic church.
Logged

Reed - Durham
Elsdon - Durham & Northumberland
Swalwell - Durham and Northumberland

All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Galium
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 560


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 17 July 08 18:40 BST (UK) »

Thanks JenB.  The RC mass and burial without ceremony probably makes sense.

The man lived very near the CoE church, with the RC church a couple of miles away.  The newspaper report says he was thought to have been dead for a week when he was found - in July...  So it was probably a matter of burying him as hurriedly and easily as possible.   

I suppose that might explain the lack of a death registration as well.
Logged
stanmapstone
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4302


My answers only refer to England and Wales


WWW
Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 17 July 08 18:41 BST (UK) »

Before 1880 no body could be buried in consecrated ground except with the service of the Church, which the incumbent of the parish or a person authorized by him was bound to perform; but the canons and prayer-book refused the use of the office for excommunicated persons,  for some grievous and notorious crime, and no person able to testify of his repentance, unbaptised persons, and persons against whom a verdict of felo de se had been found. But by the Burial Laws Amendment Act 1880, the bodies of persons entitled to be buried in parochial burial grounds, whether churchyards or graveyards, may be buried there, on proper notice being given to the minister, without the performance of the service of the Church of England, and either without any religious service or with a Christian and orderly religious service at the grave, which may be conducted by any person invited to do so by the person in charge of the funeral. The Act also allowed the use of the Church of England Burial service on unconsecrated ground


Stan
Logged

Mapstone, Mapston. Sunderland, Somerset
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
stanmapstone
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4302


My answers only refer to England and Wales


WWW
Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 17 July 08 18:47 BST (UK) »



I suppose that might explain the lack of a death registration as well.

He should not have been buried without his death being registered.


An Act for registering Births, Deaths, and Marriages in England.
[17 August 1836] 6 & 7 Will. IV. c.86


XXVII.... and every Person who shall bury or perform any Funeral or any religious Service for the Burial of any dead Body for which no Certificate shall have been duly made and delivered as aforesaid, either by the Registrar or Coroner, and who shall not within Seven Days give Notice thereof to the Registrar, shall forfeit and pay any Sum not exceeding Ten Pounds for every such Offence.



Stan
Logged

Mapstone, Mapston. Sunderland, Somerset
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Galium
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 560


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 17 July 08 18:55 BST (UK) »

Thanks for that Stan.   Does that mean it would be possible for the vicar to refuse to perform the service on the grounds that the deceased was a Roman Catholic?  Would he count as being excommunicated?   


I suppose that might explain the lack of a death registration as well.

He should not have been buried without his death being registered.


Stan

I know, but he died and was buried in July of 1850, and his name doesn't appear on the GRO index, nor in the Lancashire BMD - which I think has been fully transcribed for that date and area.

Logged
DudleyWinchurch
RootsChat Senior
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 477


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 17 July 08 18:56 BST (UK) »

Might be worth checking to see if the RC Church kept a burial register for that time period.  I don't think it was a strict requirement if it was just a service and no burial at the Church but some seem to have done so anyway, so you may be able to check out whether there was a service there for him.
Logged

McDonough, Oliver, McLoughlin, Cuthbert, Quirk (Ireland)
Dudley, Winchurch, Wolverson, Brookes (Black Country)
suey
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2443


The light is on but there's no-one at home!


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 17 July 08 19:07 BST (UK) »


Something that just struck me when reading through
Quote
He should not have been buried without his death being registered.


I know Galium knows the name of her man - but - how would a death be registered for someone who was unknown?

For instance I saw recently a burial for a 'man found dead', so no-one in the Parish where he was found would have known who he was, so how would he have been registered  Undecided

Logged

All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins.
 
stanmapstone
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4302


My answers only refer to England and Wales


WWW
Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 17 July 08 20:50 BST (UK) »

I know Galium knows the name of her man - but - how would a death be registered for someone who was unknown?

If you go to any of the GRO Deaths Indexes, at the end of the "Us" you will see lists of death registrations for "Unknowns"

Stan
Logged

Mapstone, Mapston. Sunderland, Somerset
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
stanmapstone
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4302


My answers only refer to England and Wales


WWW
Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 17 July 08 20:53 BST (UK) »

He might have been a non-conformist?
meles

As far as the Church of England was concerned Roman Catholics were non-conformist

Stan
Logged

Mapstone, Mapston. Sunderland, Somerset
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Dave Francis
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2581


Cornelius Fisk Goodwin (1880-1961)


Re: "Interred without the service"
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 17 July 08 21:04 BST (UK) »

I know Galium knows the name of her man - but - how would a death be registered for someone who was unknown?

If you go to any of the GRO Deaths Indexes, at the end of the "Us" you will see lists of death registrations for "Unknowns"

Stan

Stan - as a matter of interest, if you have a burial record for someone (who is named in the register) would it be logical to expect to find a death registration under the same name? If the death was initially registered as 'Unknown', could it be re-registered properly when the deceased's family came forward?  I ask this because the younger brother of one of my ancestors died in 1876 and was buried in the churchyard in Frant, Sussex. And yet there is no record of his death having been registered anywhere, at all!

Dave
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Surnames include: FRANCIS in Glamorgan / LANWORN in Monmouth / BLACKMAN, RUSSELL in Sussex / KEARSEY, BARLTROP in Essex / TOOKEY in Leicestershire / LASHMORE in London and Kent / GOODWIN, PASQUE, ATTOE, FISK, QUINTON, RUFFLES, CULLINGFORD and others in Suffolk / MAYOSS anywhere anytime! / GILMORE in Belfast
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
11.772:20