|
Pages: [1] 2
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: BEVAN (Read 424 times)
|
|
|
krisesjoint
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
 Online
Posts: 8398
Always Searching
|
 |
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #1 on: Friday 28 January 05 02:57 GMT (UK) » |
|
Sadly she is a Boarder in 1871
RG10/2675 ED 50 Folio 70 Page 34
20 Corpus street
St Lukes Cheltenham
home of William Burford 46 Wheelchairman and Family
BEVAN Harriet Boarder 19 Unm b Newnham Gloucestershire Domestic Servant
Cheers Kris 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
krisesjoint
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 8398
Always Searching
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #2 on: Friday 28 January 05 03:05 GMT (UK) » |
|
in 1851 we do not have any Bevans in Newsham but we do have this family in Flaxley
FLAXLEY 1851 Census Gloucestershire
HO 107/1959
15
BEVAN
John 46 Bailiff Westbury on Severn
Elizabeth 48 Westbury on Severn
James 8 Flaxley
Ann 4 Flaxley
Ill C if I can find any more in 1871 unfortunately I dont have 1861
Kris 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
krisesjoint
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 8398
Always Searching
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #3 on: Friday 28 January 05 03:15 GMT (UK) » |
|
Well here is the 1851 family in 1871 census...unfortunately tells us no more
RG10/2596 ED 2 Folio 15 Page 4
Little Dean Gloucestershire
MANNS William Joseph Head 26 Mar b Brookthorpe Worcestershire Coal Miner
MANNS Annie Wife 24 Mar b Flaxley Gloucestershire
MANNS Elizabeth Annie Dau 2 b Cruderford Gloucestershire
MANNS Frederick Joseph Son 7 Months b Little Dean Gloucestershire
BEVAN Elizabeth Mother in Law 67 Widow b Arlingham Gloucestershire Widow
BEVAN James Brother in Law 25 Unm b Flaxley Labourer
U will deff need 1861 to c if Harriet is a part of this family or if I am way off track here...LOL
All the best with it......Kris
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
krisesjoint
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 8398
Always Searching
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #5 on: Friday 28 January 05 11:25 GMT (UK) » |
|
Darcy has 1861.....I was away myself and havent seen her online since I got home.....She may be away herself.....Hopefully in 1861 Harriet will be with her family....Will See if Darcy can help Kris....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darcy
RootsChat Marquessate
 Offline
Posts: 4090
Searching for little needles in big haystacks
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #7 on: Friday 28 January 05 12:55 GMT (UK) » |
|
Hi Sandra,
I will certainly have a look at the 1861 for you but It might take a couple of days. I have had computer problems and am not set up yet to read the census. Will post as soon as I can get everything back in order again.
Regards
Darcy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fisher, Pitts, Lucas, Emmit, Keal, Bennett, Maddock, Jackson, Pidd, Lincolnshire Bullock, Read, White, Gloucestershire. Shepherd, Foyle, Crowter, Green, Wiltshire Strickland, Fisher, Butterworth, Brown, Northhamptonshire Shepherd, Bullock, Waterhouse, Lancashire Fisher, Goodwin, Rutland Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk |
|
|
Darcy
RootsChat Marquessate
Offline
Posts: 4090
Searching for little needles in big haystacks
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #8 on: Saturday 29 January 05 14:27 GMT (UK) » |
|
Hi Sandra & Kris,
I searched Newnham and Flaxley but had no luck. I did find the Bevan family from Flaxley but just the same as 1851 - children James and Ann - no Harriet - so doesn't look as if she belongs with them.
There are a few Bevans in Newnham but they all seem to be alone as either boarders, servants, or visitors.
Sandra, if you can think of anywhere else I can look for Harriet just let me know. I didn't post the details for the Flaxley family but if you want them I will.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
Regards
Darcy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fisher, Pitts, Lucas, Emmit, Keal, Bennett, Maddock, Jackson, Pidd, Lincolnshire Bullock, Read, White, Gloucestershire. Shepherd, Foyle, Crowter, Green, Wiltshire Strickland, Fisher, Butterworth, Brown, Northhamptonshire Shepherd, Bullock, Waterhouse, Lancashire Fisher, Goodwin, Rutland Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk |
|
|
krisesjoint
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 8398
Always Searching
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 29 January 05 21:11 GMT (UK) » |
|
How lovely of u to give it a try Darcy Disappointing though it may be.....I really expected this family would be hers but alas not meant to be.....On Checking Glos for Bevans they r just everywhere so unless Sandra has any more to go on I am afraid it will probably not be solved until 61 is indexed. Sandra unfortunately at this stage 61 census is not indexed so to find anything at all requires a huge efford of trawling the parish concerned as Darcy has tried 4 u with Newnham and Flaxley but alas without knowing just where to look I fear the task is hopeless. Perhaps u can locate the birth and then ask Darcy again when u know where she was born...of course if it is Newnham or Flaxley and they have since moved then I am afraid u will be out of luck until the index is available...All the best with it....Kris
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SANDRADAY
RootsChat Extra
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #10 on: Monday 31 January 05 07:40 GMT (UK) » |
|
Gosh, thankyou both very much for all your efforts, it is so good of you give up your time to look for information for other people.
All I know about Harriet Bevan is that in one census she was born in Flaxley and then on another she was born in Newnham. Laterly living in the All Saints area in Birmingham, that being on the 81, 91 and 1901 census's, then married to William Nicholls. I know nothing of her parents or if she had siblings. Myself living in the Forest of Dean, it would have been interesting to know more about Harriet, but alas I guess Iwill have to wait.
Once again thankyou, your effort is very much appreciated.
Regards, Sandra
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
BROADSTOCK, KNIGHT, BEDDIS, BEVAN, NICHOLLS - FOREST OF DEAN
NICHOLLS, BAKER - BIRMINGHAM
LOCKHART, RICE, NEED - TEWKESBURY
DAY- BERKSHIRE
|
|
|
SANDRADAY
RootsChat Extra
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #11 on: Monday 31 January 05 10:01 GMT (UK) » |
|
Hi Kris and Darcy,
Sorry to trouble you, but I have just been following up the lead that you gave me for 1871 census and it appears that Harriet's name was actually Beavan and not Bevan. If it is not too much trouble, could you possibly check out that name.
Thanks so much,
Regards, Sandra
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
BROADSTOCK, KNIGHT, BEDDIS, BEVAN, NICHOLLS - FOREST OF DEAN
NICHOLLS, BAKER - BIRMINGHAM
LOCKHART, RICE, NEED - TEWKESBURY
DAY- BERKSHIRE
|
|
|
krisesjoint
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
Online
Posts: 8398
Always Searching
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #12 on: Monday 31 January 05 10:26 GMT (UK) » |
|
Sorry Sandra none in Flaxley or Newnham in 1851....I think Darcy would have spotted that varient while trawling also.....Kris 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Darcy
RootsChat Marquessate
Offline
Posts: 4090
Searching for little needles in big haystacks
|
|
Re: BEVAN
« Reply #13 on: Monday 31 January 05 13:37 GMT (UK) » |
|
Hi Sandra,
It could be that Harriet was born in Flaxley/ Newnham Parish. There is also the village of Newnham in Newnham Parish.
I have searched Flaxley and Newnham villages - but there are many more villages in Newnham Parish.
It will take me a while but I'll have a go and search all of Newnham Parish and see if I can find Harriet.
Don't get your hopes up too much, sometimes the writing is just about illegible - but it's worth a try!
Darcy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fisher, Pitts, Lucas, Emmit, Keal, Bennett, Maddock, Jackson, Pidd, Lincolnshire Bullock, Read, White, Gloucestershire. Shepherd, Foyle, Crowter, Green, Wiltshire Strickland, Fisher, Butterworth, Brown, Northhamptonshire Shepherd, Bullock, Waterhouse, Lancashire Fisher, Goodwin, Rutland Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
|
|
|
|
