Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Wednesday 17 March 10 21:36 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Berkshire (Moderator: Little Nell)
| | | |-+  COMPLETED - a conundrum - views sought
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: COMPLETED - a conundrum - views sought  (Read 1372 times)
ribbo39
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 357


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


COMPLETED - a conundrum - views sought
« on: Wednesday 14 January 09 11:26 UTC (UK) »

My conundrum is simply this;

Rachel Brown married  Joseph Froude at Brightwalton on 5-10-1840 and the rector wrote to me saying that Joseph Froude was a
Widower, Labourer of N.Fawley and Rachael Brown, Spinster, daughter of Thomas Brown, Labourer.

In the 1851 census for Fawley, Berks she is listed together with two boys as "son-in-law" as per attached;
1851 census-fawley .png


the 1841 census has them listed but no other children.
1841 census - fawley.png


my question is this; Am I correct in assuming that Rachel Brown had been married before and these two boys were
hers, hence "son-in-law"  notation or,    could they have been her brothers  and that Joseph Froude took them in on his marriage
to Rachael?

I have found a baptismal for a Rachel Brown born 1787 in Chaddleworth with a father named Thomas but I don't think this
could be the correct Rachael.

Would appreciate some fresh ideas, views,  comments etc. I don't want to go searching for the wrong person.

regards

Alan


* 1851_census-fawley_.png (388.45 KB, 638x477 - viewed 285 times.)

* 1841_census_-_fawley.png (199.44 KB, 497x332 - viewed 288 times.)
« Last Edit: Tuesday 19 May 09 09:10 UTC (UK) by ribbo39 » Logged

Browse, Peggs, Revans/Revance/Ribbans, Spall,   in Suffolk
Belcher, Darling, Elderfield, Froude, Giles,  Stimson, Tame,   in Berks
Artis, Gray in Norfolk
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 5983


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 11:34 UTC (UK) »

It looks as though they were Rachel's sons from before her marriage to Joseph Froude.  In those days "son-in-law" was used where we now use "stepson" so that correctly described the boys' relationship to Joseph who was head of household.

That doesn't mean Rachel had been married before, though - the boys could have been born out of wedlock (and from what the rector has told you about the marriage record, that looks most likely).

Anna
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 5983


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 11:36 UTC (UK) »

P.S. How did you get access to those original census schedules for 1841 & 1851?  I've never seen those before!

Anna
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
Romilly
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2068


RHD 1884


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 11:39 UTC (UK) »


Hi Alan,

Just to add to Anna's post, - I too have a Census return where a step-son is described as a 'son-in-law'. I remember puzzling over it at the time!

Romilly.
Logged

Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Wilson, Warren, Rees, Davies, Williams, Newman, Dyer, Hamilton, Young
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 5983


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 11:41 UTC (UK) »

I have found a baptismal for a Rachel Brown born 1787 in Chaddleworth with a father named Thomas but I don't think this
could be the correct Rachael.


From the census returns Rachel seems to have been born about 1810-ish, so I think you can safely reject the 1787 baptism as being about 23 years too early!

Anna Smiley
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
ribbo39
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 357


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 11:50 UTC (UK) »

Anna,
I thought that would raise some comments. Actually I researched thru the census records when
they were on film in Somerset Hse. in 1974 and at that time they usually gave out some stenciled
forms for viewers to use and fill in.
It wasn't until I got a computer about 4 years ago when I started researching again that I got my brother to produce some fresh forms for me. They were very similar to the original ones but what you see are only screenshots to save space.


Alan


Logged

Browse, Peggs, Revans/Revance/Ribbans, Spall,   in Suffolk
Belcher, Darling, Elderfield, Froude, Giles,  Stimson, Tame,   in Berks
Artis, Gray in Norfolk
JAP
RootsChat Leaver
RootsChat Marquessate
*
Posts: 5079



Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 12:22 UTC (UK) »

Do you have Rachel in the 1861 and 1871 censuses?

It rather looks as though her husband Joseph FRUDE probably died in 1856?

In the 1881 Rachel is with daughter Fanny & her husband Samuel PAGE.  Rachel seems to have died in 1883.

If by any stroke of good luck Rachel and one or both of Thomas & George are in the same household in 1861 and/or 1871, the relationships might reveal all ...

JAP
Logged
ribbo39
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 357


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 12:40 UTC (UK) »

JAP,

Unfortunately I don't have either the 1861 or '71 census.

I do have Joseph as being buried in 1856 and also Rachel in 1883.

Perhaps some one might have theses census who could look up for me.

Alan
Logged

Browse, Peggs, Revans/Revance/Ribbans, Spall,   in Suffolk
Belcher, Darling, Elderfield, Froude, Giles,  Stimson, Tame,   in Berks
Artis, Gray in Norfolk
DebbieG
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2611



Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 12:48 UTC (UK) »

Hi

I noticed that George Brown is given as born 1834 in Wantage,  so I checked Wantage baptisms

1834 Dec 14th George s/o Rachel Brown singlewomen,  so it seems that the two boys are RAchels sons from before she was married

Smiley

DebbieG
Logged

Pay(n)ton, Payton, Pe(a)rton all Oxfordshire and Berkshire - particularly Abingdon

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
jillruss
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3006


Gt Gt Grandfather Shepherd from Aberdeen 1827-1910


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 12:52 UTC (UK) »

I would have thought that a better bet for Rachel's baptism would be 16 Jun 1811 Winterbourne, Berks d/o Thomas & Mary (IGI).

Jill

Logged

See Surname Interests Table +
Major brickwalls:
John Frith mge to Fanny, Bucks? c 1798
Bathsheba Boothroyd bp W Yks c1802
John Bishop bp E Yks c1758
Joseph Symonds mg to Sarah, prob Berks c 1735-40
John Horwood mg to Martha, Berks c 1735-40
Sarah Sculler bp  Berks area c 1675
Paul Phillips bp  Berks/Bucks c 1720
William Newell bp Berks/Bucks/Oxon c 1765
Richard Troughton mg to Jane, Westmoreland c 1732
Mary Simon bp Shrops c.1795
ribbo39
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 357


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 13:26 UTC (UK) »

to  DebbieG,

I think the George Brown's bapt. in 1834 in Wantage seems to fit the bill especially as the

mother is listed as a single woman.

I have looked for Thomas's  bapt on the I.G.I. but nothing has turned up.



To  Jill

I have seen the baptism of a Rachel on the I.G.I. for Winterbourne.    That's not  far from Fawley

which is where its stated she was born on the 1851 census.

So at the moment it would seem as if she was a single woman and not a widow as I first thought

when she married Joseph Froude  in 1840.

Alan
Logged

Browse, Peggs, Revans/Revance/Ribbans, Spall,   in Suffolk
Belcher, Darling, Elderfield, Froude, Giles,  Stimson, Tame,   in Berks
Artis, Gray in Norfolk
Sloe Gin
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 600



Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 14 January 09 13:45 UTC (UK) »

Hi, I think you need to check the Fawley PRs for Rachel's baptism, that would fit in with the Wantage entry for her son.  Winterbourne is on the opposite side of Chaddleworth, so that's likely to be another Rachel.  Fawley isn't covered on IGI, so wouldn't show up. 

Unfortunately I think the BRO is the only place to check Fawley at the moment.  I want to look for something there too, I'll check for you when I go, but I can't promise it'll be soon.
Logged
ribbo39
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 357


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 15 January 09 10:13 UTC (UK) »

Cats Ears,
Hi, I think you need to check the Fawley PRs for Rachel's baptism, that would fit in with the Wantage entry for her son.  Winterbourne is on the opposite side of Chaddleworth, so that's likely to be another Rachel.  Fawley isn't covered on IGI, so wouldn't show up. 

Unfortunately I think the BRO is the only place to check Fawley at the moment.  I want to look for something there too, I'll check for you when I go, but I can't promise it'll be soon.
Thats very kind of you to offer to look up the Fawley PRs for me.

I really appreciate that and look forward to seeing whatever you
may find.

To recap, Rachael Brown was born about 1810 in Fawley and her father
was Thomas Brown. No other details are known.

Alan

Logged

Browse, Peggs, Revans/Revance/Ribbans, Spall,   in Suffolk
Belcher, Darling, Elderfield, Froude, Giles,  Stimson, Tame,   in Berks
Artis, Gray in Norfolk
Sloe Gin
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 600



Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 15 January 09 12:25 UTC (UK) »

No bother, Fawley's one of the ones I want to have a gander at anyway.  It's just a question of when I can get there.
Logged
ribbo39
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 357


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: a conundrum - views sought
« Reply #14 on: Friday 20 February 09 10:44 UTC (UK) »

No bother, Fawley's one of the ones I want to have a gander at anyway.  It's just a question of when I can get there.


Hello Cats Ears,

I'm just enquiring as to whether you have been able to view the Fawley PRs in the
Berks RO. yet.

I know you said it was a question of when you could get there. Presumably you live some distance from the RO.

regards

Alan
20-2-09


Logged

Browse, Peggs, Revans/Revance/Ribbans, Spall,   in Suffolk
Belcher, Darling, Elderfield, Froude, Giles,  Stimson, Tame,   in Berks
Artis, Gray in Norfolk
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT

In loving memory of Eric George Davies, 1934-2009, the father of RootsChat.com































Powered by SMF 1.0.7 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
0.058:20