Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Sunday 29 November 09 07:47 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: RootsChat has moved to a new home RootsChat has moved onto a new server, so we may have a few teething problems.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  London and Middlesex
| | | |-+  London & Middlesex Lookup Requests (Moderators: dawnsh, Valda)
| | | | |-+  Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print
Author Topic: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871  (Read 973 times)
lizdb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 9414



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 05 March 09 11:58 UTC (UK) »

Aha - now if Molloyboy has the Holborn marriage cert and can confirm what her dad's name and occupation are, then we may be on to something.

If her dad is Joseph, a silk weaver, then here is her family in 1851 and ... she is called Eliza Louisa here.

HO107 1490 756 54
31 Boston place, Marylebone
Joseph Packer 56 Silk weaver bn Reading Berks
Elizabeth 52 bn middx St George
Henry Alonzo Stewart Packer 13 son bn Marylebone
Eliza Louisa Packer 11 bn Marylebone
David Packer 32 visitor bn Berks Reading

and her birth is
Jan/Feb/MAr 1840
Eliza Louisa Packer
Marylebone 1 181

(and out of interest, brother's birth is
Jan/Feb/Mar 1838
Henry Alonzo Stewart Packer
Bethnal Green 2  217)
Logged

Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
lizdb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 9414



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 05 March 09 12:45 UTC (UK) »

And in 1841 - Big age gap suggests possiboe second marriage for Jo or Eliz, or maybe Henry and Eliza(Louisa) are not their children but actually grandchildren??

HO107 677 12
Boston Place Marylebone
Joseph Packer 47 labourer Not bn in county
Elizabeth 40 yes
Jemima 20 yes
Nesta 12 yes
Henry 2 yes
Eliza 1 yes

next door
Henry Packer 17 weaver yes
Logged

Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
louisa maud
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 1385



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 05 March 09 12:58 UTC (UK) »

if it is any help I have found her baptism
St Mary, St Marylebone Road
born 04/02/1840
bapt 14/04/1840
father Joseph
Mother Elizabeth
Plus her siblings

But we are no nearer the Biddlecombe's

LM
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Garner, Marylebone, Paddington,  Northolt, Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Parkinson St Pancras,
Lethbridge, Paddington, Slough
Jenkins Marylebone, Paddington
Tindal Marylebone, Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth, 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent, Canada (Toronto)
Coveney, Kent, Lambeth
Sondes, Kent, London
lizdb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 9414



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #18 on: Thursday 05 March 09 13:02 UTC (UK) »

We are not, I know, but at least it has brought into play the possibility that she (IF this is her! ! ! ) may use the name Eliza.
(not that I can find an Eliza Biddlecombe either!)

WAiting to see what Molloyboy says about her dad from marriage., and about the nephew
Logged

Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
louisa maud
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 1385



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #19 on: Thursday 05 March 09 13:09 UTC (UK) »

I got really excited just now, easily pleased me, but this Eliza Biddlecombe was 30 MONTHS on 1871, would have been close if it had showed 30 years but sadly not, her age on 1861 was a little out if she was born 1840,

I just hope we are not barking up the wrong tree but we won't know till Molloyboy comes up with the details

I am off for lunch, I think I deserve it !!

LM
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Garner, Marylebone, Paddington,  Northolt, Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Parkinson St Pancras,
Lethbridge, Paddington, Slough
Jenkins Marylebone, Paddington
Tindal Marylebone, Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth, 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent, Canada (Toronto)
Coveney, Kent, Lambeth
Sondes, Kent, London
Molloyboy
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 138



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #20 on: Thursday 05 March 09 13:46 UTC (UK) »

Thanks for taking an interest Liz.

You suggested coming at it from a different angle, and finding out her maiden name. You're right, she was born LOUISA PACKER. It's really the Packers I'm researching.

She was born in Marylebone, Middx 1838.
Her father was John Packer basket maker b. Sandwich, Kent 1804.
Her mother was Elizabeth Lewis b. C 1809.

In 1841 she lived with her parents and siblings John, Matthew, Charles, and sophia in Southwark.
In 1851 she lived with her widowed father at 15, Brunswick Grove St Pancras.
She married George Biddlecombe in 1860.
In 1861 Louisa and George lived at Brill Crescent St Pancras.

Oh yeah, she was a witness to the marriage of Thomas John Packer and Margaret O' Shaughnessy in St Botolph, London in 1873 (not 1870 as I said previously). Thomas was her brother Matthews son.

Phew, I wish I could have cut and pasted that lot from my notes.

Dan
Logged
louisa maud
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 1385



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #21 on: Thursday 05 March 09 14:51 UTC (UK) »

I am wondering if there is an Irish connection here whereby the Biddlecombe's went backward and forwards to Ireland and missed the census.

LM
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Garner, Marylebone, Paddington,  Northolt, Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Parkinson St Pancras,
Lethbridge, Paddington, Slough
Jenkins Marylebone, Paddington
Tindal Marylebone, Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth, 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent, Canada (Toronto)
Coveney, Kent, Lambeth
Sondes, Kent, London
Molloyboy
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 138



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #22 on: Thursday 05 March 09 14:53 UTC (UK) »

In the 1861 census, George is 34, not 24. Sorry.

Dan
Logged
louisa maud
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 1385



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #23 on: Thursday 05 March 09 15:11 UTC (UK) »

I have looked at the 1861 and noted that he was 34 and not 24 as you had previously stated,  but to be quite honest , I am stumped, can't find hide nor hair of them on 1871 even by just using Christian names and plus or minus 5 years either side of expected birht dates

LM
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Garner, Marylebone, Paddington,  Northolt, Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Parkinson St Pancras,
Lethbridge, Paddington, Slough
Jenkins Marylebone, Paddington
Tindal Marylebone, Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth, 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent, Canada (Toronto)
Coveney, Kent, Lambeth
Sondes, Kent, London
lizdb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 9414



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #24 on: Thursday 05 March 09 15:20 UTC (UK) »

OK, so we can scrub Eliza out of the picture (shame, i did so like that name for her brother, Henry Alonzo...!)

The REAL Louisa's birth is -
Jan/Feb/Mar 1838
MArylebone 1 123
Louisa Packer

But - 1851 census is interesting. By rights (from birth, age at marriage etc) she should be about 13.
But she is listed as 19. the image is pretty clear - I suppose the only other thing it could possibly be is a 12 with a very curly 2. Which would be OK, if her birthday (13th) was after the census.

Here it is -
HO107 1495 294 63
John 46 widowr Basket MAker Master bn Sandwich Kent
Louisa 19 House servant bn Marylebone
Sophia 11 bn M
Ann 4 bn Bermonsey Surrey
Sarah Humphries dtr in law Unm 26 Housekeeper bn St George in the East
James Humphries 5 son bn St G in the East

Who is Sarah? for her to be a dtr in law she would be married to a Packer son, and therfore called Packer. MAybe she is a step daughter, and John's wife had been married before to a Humphries.

Have you actually got her marriage cert to Biddlecombe? with dad John the basketmaker on it



Logged

Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
DEVIS
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 222


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #25 on: Thursday 05 March 09 17:36 UTC (UK) »

Could this be Louisa`s father John remarried.? Smiley

1871      RG10/292/34/60   2 Lambyard, Islington

Packer John H M 66 Basket Maker b. Kent
Packer Sarah W M 46                    b. Bloomsbury

Devis


Logged

Pickford. Area: Somerset, London, Essex.
Wheeler. Area: Somerset.
Canty. Area: London. Ireland.
Kenney. Area: London
Preston. Area: Herts, London.
Frith. Area: London.
Thompson. Area:London
Molloyboy
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 138



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #26 on: Thursday 05 March 09 17:39 UTC (UK) »

Liz, we are entering stormy Packer waters.

It seems both JOHN PACKER b. Sandwich 1804, and his son MATTHEW PACKER b. White chapel C 1829, had a predeliction for unofficial marriages.

John 'shacked up' with his housekeeper/daughter in law Sarah when his wife died and Matthew had at least 4 children with a woman called Ann Purdy before they separated and both married different people.

Anyhoo, no I don't have George and Louisa Biddlecombe's marriage cert.

.................And, how do you do that Liz? In your last post, you included a whole block of text from a census listing. I can't right-click without a copyright notice popping up.

Dan
Logged
DEVIS
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 222


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #27 on: Thursday 05 March 09 17:45 UTC (UK) »

Marriage June 1858 Newington 1d 211

John Packer to Sarah Humphries


Devis Smiley
Logged

Pickford. Area: Somerset, London, Essex.
Wheeler. Area: Somerset.
Canty. Area: London. Ireland.
Kenney. Area: London
Preston. Area: Herts, London.
Frith. Area: London.
Thompson. Area:London
Molloyboy
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 138



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #28 on: Thursday 05 March 09 17:46 UTC (UK) »

I missed that Devis.
Logged
lizdb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 9414



Re: Louisa and George Biddlecombe in 1871
« Reply #29 on: Thursday 05 March 09 17:53 UTC (UK) »

.................And, how do you do that Liz? In your last post, you included a whole block of text from a census listing. I can't right-click without a copyright notice popping up.

I typed it out!

Copyright rules prevent cut and paste. but the actual information is not copyright, so yuo can type it in your own words.

Devis has found the marriage to Sarah Humphries (well done D)

With the age query on 1851 and no sign after1861, it might be a good idea to get the marriage cert to Biddlecombe, just to confirm that her dad is James the basket weaver and we are looking at the right lass. And to see if it has any other clues.

At pesent everything is hinging on her age on that 1861 census - and we all know censuses can be wrong ...........



Logged

Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.045:20