Dave T H
RootsChat Extra
 
Posts: 18
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Hello
I am trying to find the parents of John Brunt born 1872 in Eckington and Mary Marsh born about 1877 in Eckington. I think they got married July Aug Sept 1897 (Chesterfield Vol 7b pp1215) I have ordered the certificate which will hopefully give me my next lead in terms of parents names but as you know these can take some time and you all know the feeling of not being able to wait / move on? Hope someone can help me with any information about these 2 relatives Thanks Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
There is a John Blunt in the 1881 RG11/3441/27/48
Thomas Lakin 50 bricklayer b Burbridge Leics Jarvis Brunt 20 boarder coal miner b Eckington John Brunt 9 stepson b Eckington Elizabeth Hodgson 47 housekeeper b Eckington
Can't find a Brunt/Lakin marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
Possible for Mary
1881 RG11/4613/57/7
Charles Marsh 28 lab brickworks, b Hepworth Yorks Mary A. Marsh 24 b Hepworth Yorks Sarah Marsh 5 b Hepworth Yorks Mary Marsh 4 b Eckington Annie Marsh 1 b Eckington
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
1891 RG12/2770/101/35 Sitwell Street
Jarvis Brunt 29 coalminer Charlotte Brunt 27 Edith Annie Brunt 7 John Wm Brunt 5 Arthur Geo Brunt 2 Ivy Ethel Brunt 9 mths Betsy Brunt 21 sister, gen servant John Brunt 19 brother coal miner
all b Eckington
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
This looks likely. You could have a go on these, if they turn out wrong - well........ 
1871 RG10/3618/25/44
John Brunt 29 occ looks like colliers lab b Whitwell Derbys Hannah E Brunt 27 Janis Brunt 9 son (Jarvis) Sarah A Brunt 7 Betsey Brunt 1 (matches with 1891)
These two are only separated by one slash, boarders? or relatives? George Robinson 49 Ann Robinson 57
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
Marriage on freebmd
June 1864 Sheffield 9c 421 to Hannah Elizabeth Hulley
but ......this is a bit late for Jarvis (not unkown to happen though)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
Death Sept 1876 Chesterfield 7b 388 John Brunt aged 34
possible for Hannah - but the age is out 3 years - which can happen with death registrations.
March 1879 Chesterfield 7b 485 Hannah Brunt aged 39
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
1881 RG11/2508/109/4
Betsy Brunt is at the 'New Orphan Home' Ashley Down, Barton Regis, Gloucs
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
omskirk
RootsChat Veteran
    
Posts: 539

|
Also have a look on my website, Eckington registers but I have only done up to 1840 but you may find something on there if you go back a bit www.ridgeway.org.uk
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
spendlove
RootsChat Veteran
    
Posts: 509
I've not edited my PROFILE yet
|
Hi,
If you read the actual Census Sheet for 1871 Census RG10/3618/25/44 the age of Hannah E. Hulley is actualy 37, given this age she could have been married previously and the son Jarvis age 9 could be from her previous marriage. He may not be illigitmate.
Marriage June Q 1864 Sheffield 9C 421 Certainly looks possible, however there is a bride missing from this entry.
Spendlove
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
Yes it does look 37 now I have a proper look. It also says she is born Eckington.
Is this a red herring - Birth - June 1844, Sheffield 22 487 - Hannah Hulley
It will be interesting to see what the marriage cert says.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
silvery
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2292
information Crown Copyright, from www.nation
|
The marriage cert would only give John's father's name and his occupation. But it would be interesting to see what it says.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|