|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: William HALE born 1796 (Read 367 times)
|
|
|
Pels.
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5429
|
Hi bhunter,
Was it the census information you were looking for .. I can see both William and Judith in 1841 .. with Elizabeth as a nine year old .. ?
Kind regards,
Pels.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pels.
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5429
|
I'll post the details anyway .. ! 
1841 census:
HO107/446/10, Folio 7, Page 8
Hertfordshire, Reed
Will Hale, 50, Ag Lab
Judith, 45
George, 20, Ag Lab
James, 15, Ag Lab
Mary, 12
Elizabeth, 9
Hester, 7
All born in county.
Interestingly enough, further down the same page .. there might be a connection .. ?
William Hale, 70, Pauper Ag Lab
Jane, 70
Joseph, 40, Ag Lab
John, 10
All born in county,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pels.
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5429
|
I can't help you with their marriage I'm afraid .. hopefully someone else can help you with that .. ?
But here is Judith in 1851 ..
1851 census:
HO107/1707, Folio 294, Page 13
Hertfordshire, Reed
George Hall, h, mar, 32, Ag Lab, b. Reed
Lucy, wife, 31, Lab wife, b. Chipping
John, son, 4, b. Reed
Judith, mother, wid, 59, Pauper, b. Reed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pels.
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5429
|
The last one for Judith .. 
1861 census:
RG9/813, Folio 66, Page 9
Hertfordshire, Reed
Street.
Judy Hale, h. wid, 70, Pauper Ag Lab Widow, b. Reed
Death, Dec qtr, 1862
Judith Hale
Royston, Vol 3a, page 167
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pels.
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 5429
|
This made me look twice Di .. if the census details in 1841 were rounded down to such a degree .. and William was in fact 54 and Judith 49 this would slot her age in nicely with the later returns.
Meaning Judith could have been approx 1792 and William as early as 1787.
So therefore William may have been 24 when they married, is this making any sense .. ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
|
