Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Friday 27 November 09 14:51 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  Technical Help
| | |-+  Internet Explorer 8
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 Print
Author Topic: Internet Explorer 8  (Read 5271 times)
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #210 on: Wednesday 10 June 09 14:30 UTC (UK) »

My criticisms of Microsoft, based on fact, are no more moaning than your opposite view is that of an apologist for a flawed product.


Not at all Graham.  My motives for posting on this thead are the same as they ever were - to help others with their problems, which is what I was trying to do when you posted your latest complaint.  I am not an apologist for Microsoft, and I have never denied your claims that IE8 has flaws - name one piece of software that doesn't !


Nick, if you read my post (as quoted by you above) properly you will see that I was not accusing you of being an apologist for Microsoft, quite the opposite in fact.

I do note, though, that this is not the first time you have accused me of moaning as well as accusing me of talking rubbish. If that comes within your definition of helping people with their problems then so be it, we shall have to agree to differ.

It is also irrelevant to this discussion whether or not any other software has flaws. Again, if you look back at my posts you will see that my concern is not simply that IE8 is flawed but also the way in which Microsoft is addressing (or not) those flaws and the fact that they have directed my support request to a number of teams which have nothing at all to do with IE8.

Graham
Logged
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #211 on: Saturday 13 June 09 07:04 UTC (UK) »

Hurrah and Huzzah !!!!! Yesterday, four weeks to the day after first contacting Microsoft, I received a solution to my problem.

Somehow a particular registry key had been set to (what IE8, but not other browsers, considered to be) an invalid value. Setting it to the correct value enabled IE8 to function correctly.

I'm still waiting for further tests to be carried out by Microsoft for the reason why the invalid value occurred and why IE8 did not trap and report it as an error, rather than simply refusing to work without explanation.

I'm also waiting for confirmation of whether the fix will work in all cases. If any more of our customers experience problems I should like to be able to tell them the reason and how to correct the problem.

Graham
Logged
NigelG
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 589



Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #212 on: Saturday 13 June 09 09:07 UTC (UK) »

Just to let you know about my problem accessing GR.

I contacted Microsoft via their on-line support dept and they responded within 24 hours with a number of solutions (all of which failed to help).

I emailed them back asking how I could reverse the installation back to IE 7 and within a matter of hours an update came through which completely resolved the issue.
Logged

Davies, Edwards, Evans, Griffiths, Hughes, James, Jones, Morgan, Nicholas, Powell, Prytherch, Rees, Williams in Glamorgan, Brecon, PEM, CMN & MGY

Biddle, Budd, Clark/e, Davis/Davies, Elliott, Emery, Harper, Harris, Lloyd, Parsons, Phillips, Pitt, Reed/Reid/Read/Rhead, Rogers, Scandrett, Smith, Tylor & Waldron in Staffs, Worcs, Hef, Cheshire, Shrops., Middlesex & Surrey.

Cooghan/Coogan/Cogan - Castleblaney, Co Monaghan

Census Information is Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #213 on: Tuesday 16 June 09 16:46 UTC (UK) »

Microsoft have now confirmed that the fix supplied to me should work for other people but have been unable to explain how the registry key was given the wrong value, though it has to be something to do with the IE8 installation routine.

It's a bit annoying that Microsoft didn't prevent the error from occurring in IE8 because one of the references they supplied me with - Here - shows that they have been aware of the possibilities of problems for a couple of years.

Microsoft have, however, agreed that a program should never end abnormally without providing a feedback message to the user. If that had happened in this case then it would have taken rather less than four weeks, and rather less wasted time, for MS to provide the solution. All being well they will also take on board the need to amend the IE8 code to always supply a reason when an Abend occurs.

Graham
Logged
Redroger
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2234


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #214 on: Tuesday 16 June 09 16:52 UTC (UK) »

If that's the case Graham, then the sooner they practise what they preach the better. Will now have a look at the link you mentioned.
Logged

Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)
Redroger
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2234


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #215 on: Tuesday 16 June 09 16:54 UTC (UK) »

Another good reason not to go for IE8 in XP
Logged

Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #216 on: Tuesday 16 June 09 18:44 UTC (UK) »

If that's the case Graham, then the sooner they practise what they preach the better. Will now have a look at the link you mentioned.
The overriding lesson I used to preach to trainee programmers was KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid. There is no such thing as a complex computer instruction but things can get hairy when they are put together wrongly. That factor is magnified when an instruction is actually a macro which executes a subroutine which the programmer (or is it simply coder these days?) doesn't fully understand.

It all calls for a thorough specification and highly structured testing which checks that the developed code does what is specified. Basically no more or less than we expect from manufacturers of things like cars and aircraft.

Another good reason not to go for IE8 in XP
Having installed IE8 on the Vista laptop again, in order to test out the fix, I've left it in place but I haven't used that machine to access the Internet much so far, so wouldn't like to comment on how good (or not) it is.

Given the problems I've experienced, though, I'm not inclined to install it on any of our XP machines. IE7 is running perfectly well and giving us what we need - with Opera & Sea Monkey installed as alternatives if we require them.

Graham
Logged
Nick29
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2899



Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #217 on: Tuesday 16 June 09 22:15 UTC (UK) »

Another good reason not to go for IE8 in XP

Why ?  Graham is using Vista.   I don't see your logic ?

IE8 & XP SP3 in use here - no problems at all.

Logged

Best Wishes, Nick.

Research interests:
Field - Luton & Islington
Hole - Somerset, Suffolk & Surrey
Farnish, Parker, Cattermole, Last, Wasp, Church - Suffolk
Lewin/Lowin/Lowen - Hertfordhire
Martin - Eltham & Greenwich, Kent (London)
Stead - Greenwich, London (Kent) & Maidstone
Wood - Hertfordshire

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Koromo
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 1805



Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #218 on: Tuesday 16 June 09 22:29 UTC (UK) »


Graham

I'm pleased for you that Microsoft has sorted your problem.
There is nothing more infuriating than not knowing why something has stopped working.

Cheers
Koromo
Smiley
Logged

Census information is Crown copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
________________________________________________________________

Lewis: Abergavenny | London | NZ | Chilliwack, BC
Stallworthy: Bucks | Samoa | NZ | Canada
Brothers: Nottingham | Salford | NZ
Gronous: Kington | London
Darling: Dunbar | Tahiti
Keat: Cornwall | NZ
Bowles: Deal | NZ
Coaney: Bucks
Jones: Brecon
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #219 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 07:06 UTC (UK) »

Another good reason not to go for IE8 in XP

Why ?  Graham is using Vista.   I don't see your logic ?

IE8 & XP SP3 in use here - no problems at all.
Agreed that the particular problem which I and my customer suffered occurred using Vista. I also agree that many installations of IE8 (probably the vast majority, I haven't counted) are trouble free in both Vista and XP.

However, there still remain a number of problems (including the one I suffered and those which a Google search highlights, connected with IE8 running under XP) which are there because IE8 has not been throughly tested.

On that basis the law of "if it ain't broke don't fix it" comes in. The logic is that if IE7 is providing all that is required and implementation of IE8 carries a risk of malfunction then that is a good reason for not implementing it.

Graham
Logged
Nick29
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2899



Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #220 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 07:27 UTC (UK) »

IE8 has functions that IE7 didn't have, which are not earth-shattering, but which are still good to have.  I wouldn't want to roll back to IE7.

I still think that the problems that Vista users have had with IE8 are due to changes brought about by Microsoft to stop "psuedo hard drives" on flash memory sticks from propagating viruses when they auto-run.  This will apparently be fully implemented in Windows 7, due out later this year, but my guess is that many of the roots for this new change were already laid down in Vista.

If the problems in IE8 were down to the actual program coding, then a simple registry change wouldn't fix them.

Logged

Best Wishes, Nick.

Research interests:
Field - Luton & Islington
Hole - Somerset, Suffolk & Surrey
Farnish, Parker, Cattermole, Last, Wasp, Church - Suffolk
Lewin/Lowin/Lowen - Hertfordhire
Martin - Eltham & Greenwich, Kent (London)
Stead - Greenwich, London (Kent) & Maidstone
Wood - Hertfordshire

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #221 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 08:18 UTC (UK) »

IE8 has functions that IE7 didn't have, which are not earth-shattering, but which are still good to have.  I wouldn't want to roll back to IE7.

Computer hardware and software are simply tools. As with anything else, a function is only good to have if one has a need for it. People in general don't rush out to buy a new screwdriver (for instance) just because the latest on the market has a bit of extra oomph; they do so if they identify that it would be useful.

I would not argue with your desire not to roll back to IE7 but neither would I argue with someone who does not wish to implement IE8 because they do not need the new functionality.

I still think that the problems that Vista users have had with IE8 are due to changes brought about by Microsoft to stop "psuedo hard drives" on flash memory sticks from propagating viruses when they auto-run.  This will apparently be fully implemented in Windows 7, due out later this year, but my guess is that many of the roots for this new change were already laid down in Vista.

When "my" problem first occurred I wasn't sure whether it was the result of a deliberate act by Microsoft or a coding bug. It soon became clear that it was the latter though. If it was the result of a deliberate act then Microsoft would have had documentation detailing the "roots" and should have been able to direct my request to the appropriate team and supply an answer to the problem quickly.

If the problems in IE8 were down to the actual program coding, then a simple registry change wouldn't fix them.

The problem in the IE8 coding is that the program simply stops (with no explanation) if the particular registry entry has a value which is not expected. The registry change amended the value to one which the coding is capable of handling and thus enabled it to work.

It is a general principle of programming (at least it was when I was developing & maintaining software) that a program should never end abnormally without providing a feedback message to the user. The fact that IE8 did so proves that there is a coding error. As I said yesterday, Microsoft have agreed that is the case.

Graham
Logged
Redroger
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2234


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #222 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 16:51 UTC (UK) »

Why don't we just apply the KISS principle and keep it simple; seems to be a human trait though we build on a foundation, and then add something to it, and build it into an ever more complex edifice, since this is often easier (in the short term) than starting out afresh.
Logged

Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)
GrahamH
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 253


JiGraH Resources


WWW
Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #223 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 19:16 UTC (UK) »

Why don't we just apply the KISS principle and keep it simple; seems to be a human trait though we build on a foundation, and then add something to it, and build it into an ever more complex edifice, since this is often easier (in the short term) than starting out afresh.
Absolutely. All too often short term savings lead to previously stable systems becoming akin to upside down pyramids - which have to be replaced when they fall over and smash to pieces anyway.

No system changes should be made without reference to both the original overall specification and any changes which have taken place subsequently. Too often only the small area being changed is considered with no thought for any effect on the rest of the system.

Graham
Logged
Redroger
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2234


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Internet Explorer 8
« Reply #224 on: Thursday 18 June 09 16:25 UTC (UK) »

The edifice which I had most to do with during my working career was railway conditions of employment, and rates of pay. Suffice it to say as an illustration that the pay of workshop staff in the 1960s and 70s was based on the following: The rate of pay in 1925, known as the base rate plus the amount of each pay rise added separately and individually when awarded plus for staff in motive power depots a repair bonus based on 27 1/2% of the base rate. You can therefore imagine what a fitters pay card looked like, around 50 entries to determine his rate of pay before bonus. Luckily decimalisation simplified this sector; however in the early 1990s I was headhunted to a vacancy as a chief clerk in charge of rostering train crew, primarily drivers on the basis that I was the only person on the railway management side who had any knowledge of a form of rostering and payment known as contract mileage; a clear case of hire the roster expert and teach him about computers, rather than hire a computer expert and teach him about rosters. This mileage agreement had originally implemented in 1914 (I think), my experience of it was 1958-1964, the vacancy arose in 1993 nearly 80 years after the first agreement  and over 30 after my experience with it. Staff benefitting from the arrangement worked a 3 or 4 day week and were paid megabucks.
Logged

Ayres Brignell Cornwell Harvey Shipp  Stimpson Stubbings (all Cambs) Baumber Baxter Burton Ethards Stanton (all Lincs) Luffman (all counties)
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT

In loving memory of Eric George Davies, 1934-2009, the father of RootsChat.com































Powered by SMF 1.0.7 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
0.057:18