Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Wednesday 25 November 09 02:51 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  The Common Room
| | |-+  Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Author Topic: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?  (Read 1212 times)
Keith Sherwood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3512


One's native place is the shell of one's soul...


Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« on: Friday 08 May 09 14:01 UTC (UK) »

Hi, Everyone,
Have recently been trying to trace back the CROW family of  London , but who appear to originate earlier from the Lincoln area.  Running through some of the male members is the forename DOCKERY, as in Roland Dockery CROW, b.1891, and his grandfather George Dockery CROW, b. 1830.
It appears that George Dockery CROW's mother was a Susannah KNOWLES, baptised 04-01-1801 at St Mary Le Wigford Lincoln, parents Peregrine KNOWLES and Mary (nee JACKSON).
What is slightly bizarre is that at least from 1808 onwards Peregrine begins to call himself Peregrine Knowles DOCKERY and with Mary he produces at least 3 other daughters up to 1812.  He dies in 1825, and his widow Mary lives to the ripe old age of 94, calling herself Mary DOCKERY in the Censuses where she subsequently appears.
Now, I happened to look on the DOCWRA family website on the internet, which boasts some pretty impressive early ancestors, and was surprised to see those three 1808-1812 baptisms listed there, with the parents' names given as Peregrine Knowles DOCKERA and Mary JACKSON.
Would this mean that the curiously-named Peregrine was definitely a member of the DOCWRA clan, or has someone simply added him to the DOCWRA melting pot?
This DOCKERY name that flits in and out of the CROW family is particularly strange, in that Peregrine was simply referring to himself as Peregrine KNOWLES, baptised with that name 15-04-1773 at St Mark's Lincoln.  So where does DOCKERY suddenly magically materialise from, and what have the DOCWRA family got to do with it?
I'm puzzled, I expect any unsuspecting Rootschatter who reads this must be totally confused, too...
Very best wishes,
keith
Logged
Spidermonkey
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 1040


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #1 on: Friday 08 May 09 14:28 UTC (UK) »

Hi Keith, I think that answer very much depends upon who is collating the names!  That said, the majority of one name studies I have come across are a collection of all examples of that one name, perhaps gathered after trawling through census returns. 

Not sure that helps you work out whether your Peregrine fits in anywhere, sorry!
Logged
Keith Sherwood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3512


One's native place is the shell of one's soul...


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #2 on: Friday 08 May 09 15:34 UTC (UK) »

Spidermonkey,
Thanks very much for those comments...I've tried e-mailing an address on that DOCWRA website, but as the last update seemed to suggest 2004, I'm not too hopeful of eliciting a response,
keith
Logged
Lady Di
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2936



Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #3 on: Friday 08 May 09 22:06 UTC (UK) »

Hi Keith,

Sorry, can't help with your Peregrine but most one-name studies are just a collection of people with almost the same surname somewhere in history. In theory, they have a common ancestor but I doubt it has ever been proven.

A couple of my early lot were the Docwra family members and I've found that all their records (on the website you mention), as great and detailed as they are, don't all inter-connect to create one big happy family. Maybe they did if you go back far enough to people like Adam (Docwra) and Eve (Docwra)   Grin Grin

Your Dockery name is thought to be just another version of Docwra but of course may have no connection whatsoever.
The name may even have been associated with men working on the Docks at one time.

Is it possible that your Peregrine actually changed his name in order to inherit an entailed estate - or on the other side of the coin - did he find out that his parents weren't actually married so used the Dockery name to honour one of his mother's parents (assuming that's where the name came from  Undecided  ) ?

Did he change his name at the time of a grandparent's death? Did a Dockery grandfather die and leave him something so he added the extra surname?

Sorry - all questions and no answers  Roll Eyes


Di
Logged

MOULE             :Whaddon in Cambs
SMITH              :SSX/Brighton and Birmingham
TATTERSALL     : NSW aft 1862
VANDERGUCHT : All UK & NSW
GINGER            : London
AGGS                : Norfolk & London
GOODWIN        : Kent
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
behindthefrogs
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 4246


EDLIN


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #4 on: Friday 08 May 09 22:20 UTC (UK) »

My own Edlin one name study which I have not published on a website consists of six major families which so far are not connected, although I anticipate that this could be reduced to three.

I also have about thirty small family groups, each of about three generations which are unconnected and a file of a few hundred unconnected people.

Incidently I have not trawled the census, bmd or any of the other major sources to collect these names although I do use these sources to try to establish connections.

David
Logged

Living in Berkshire. From Northampton & Milton Keynes
DETAILS OF THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE IN SURNAME INTERESTS, LINK AT FOOT OF PAGE
Wilson, Higgs, Buswell, PARCELL, Matthews, TAMKIN, Seckington, Pates, Coupland, Webb, Arthur, MAYNARD, Caves, Norman, Winch, Culverhouse, Drakeley.
Johnson, Routledge, SHIRT, SAICH, Mills, SAUNDERS, EDLIN, Perry, Vickers, Pakeman, Griffiths, Marston, Turner, Child, Sheen, Gray, Woolhouse
Census Info is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Springbok
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 938


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #5 on: Friday 08 May 09 23:18 UTC (UK) »

Hi Keith,

many family names are unlikely to be even remotely connected.

Take any name associated with a occupation back in the dim and distant .
Miller, Baker ,Fuller,Tanner ,Fletcher were all  village professions  and could well have started out as John the miller to distinguish him from John the Archer, in one ville, only in the next hamlet , John the Archers cousin was known as Peter , Michels'son.
In Latter years when a particular name had been used for a couple of generations ,and had sometimes altered its spelling  then yes ,maybe it is possible to find a mutual ancestor.

With those provisos, then One Name Studies are valid to perhaps the 13th Century and further back if a name is connected to well documented family

Spring
Logged

Dorset: Ackerman,Bungey,Bunter Chant,Hyle
Islington:Bedford, Eaton,Wilkins
Beds,Fulham: Brazier
Shoreditch: Burton,Coverdale
Essex ,Clerkenwell:Craswell,Cresswell
St.Lukes Middx:Doughty, Dunkley
Andover/IOW/Fulham:Gasser
Fulham: Neal
Bucks:Putnam,Wingrove
Bullwell.Notts:Wilkinson
Clerkenwell/Islington:Wyllie
Herts/ Tottenham/Walthamstow:Young
Keith Sherwood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3512


One's native place is the shell of one's soul...


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #6 on: Friday 08 May 09 23:31 UTC (UK) »

Hi again, Lady Di,
There need to be lots of questions posed to solve this particular puzzle, so I appreciate you firing away with them!  I just wonder too who saw fit to add those three baptisms to the DOCWRA website collection...
And thanks very much for those interesting and relevant comments on one-name sites, Springbok and David,
regards, keith
Logged
johnfw
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 104


5 convict ancestors !! how bad does it get ??


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 10 May 09 04:05 UTC (UK) »

I have included a link to a one name study which seems to be a very good example of a published product.

In another instance 'one name study listings' have put me onto a collector of names for my family name, in such a case I need contact the custodian of this study to make enquiries as required. It all helps in the end.

John

http://www.piggin.org/index.htm
Logged

WILKES WILKS; Gloucester
PIGGIN; Leicester
Ron Lankshear
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 173


Ron in the Bush near his Sydney home


WWW
Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 10 May 09 04:51 UTC (UK) »

My study of LANKSHEAR often spelt  LANKSHIRE and similar and I have included LANKESHEER is not listed at
http://www.one-name.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi?find=D but DOCWRA and similar variations is.
Why not contact those people.

I try to list all uses of LANKSHEAR etc that I find including use as a middle name - which includes CLARE similar to the quoted Piggin site.
There are not many LANKSHEAR and in essence we all link back to a marriage in 1713 but a few people I have not connected as yet but perhaps one day.
LANKSHEAR appears to be a spelling from a Oxfordshire dialect way of pronouncing Lancashire as LANKESHEER is from Somerset.

Now surnames  do not have such a narrow origin - people do one name studies but could not link all the people as their common ancestor is more anthropology than genealogy.



Logged

Ron was born in Shepherds Bush and "knew" London fairly well
LANKSHEAR EAGLE SKEGGS RUSSELL HAYBALL HALE ROBBINS KING
family history with many research links for everyone at
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~lankshear/
Vicwinann
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 658



Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 10 May 09 18:07 UTC (UK) »

Hi
I can't answer the specific Docwra question but thought that people might like to know that  there is an extremely good and very detailed article on one name studies and  the Guild of One Name Studies (GOONS)  in this month's Family History Monthly. 

From some of the replies I have read here it would seem that many people do not understand at all what an ONS is, or its reasons for being.

No, not all people with the same surname are connected, but many groupings are linked with other groupings.
Yours
Vicwinann
Logged

Sellwood Berkshire Oxon Lancs Wilts; Cassell Berkshire and Guildford; Leighs Guildford and London; Saunders Portsea, Greenwich and Deptford ; Austin Cookham; Osgood Berkshire; Dack Norfolk; Darling Berkshire and Mapledurham; Wilkins Englefield Berks; Havenhand Derbys; Whileman Derbys; Reedman Derbys, Notts, Australia, Africa; Rottenberry Deptford and Devon;
Keith Sherwood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3512


One's native place is the shell of one's soul...


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 12 May 09 23:04 UTC (UK) »

Hi again,
All very interesting aspects of this theme re One-Name studies and websites.
A bit irritating of me then, perhaps, to pick up on the specifics of the puzzle over this KNOWLES/DOCKERY adoption...
However, I've been looking again at the IGI entries, and Peregrine KNOWLES seems to become Peregrine Knowles DOCKERAY at the baptism of daughter Mary Ann as early as 1803.
So, recapitulating, Peregrine KNOWLES and Mary JACKSON marry on 17th Nov 1800 in Lincoln, and have a daughter Susannah KNOWLES bapt: 04-10-1801.  Thereafter, from 1803 thru to 1812, they have 4 more daughters (one of whom dies within months), all with the DOCKERAY surname after their father, reinvented as Peregrine Knowles DOCKERAY.
The other odd thing is that the mother Mary DOCKERY/AY was 94 when she died in 1859, giving her a birth year of about 1764/5.  If she was indeed the mother of the (second) Sarah DOCKERAY bapt. 1812, she would have been 48 years old then.  Not impossible, I suppose...
Still scratching my head...
keith
Logged
Ron Lankshear
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 173


Ron in the Bush near his Sydney home


WWW
Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 13 May 09 00:52 UTC (UK) »

So your question wasn't really "Are all the name..........." but was "is Mary Jackson who could be born 1765 the mother of Sarah Dockeray c1812." Is that your real question?

I did suggest looking at the GOONS site as there are several surname connections for DOCWRA DOCKERY etc etc.
One of the GOONS may be a current active researcher

Mary Dockery is 86 in 1851 census (have not found 1841) - so 94 in 1859 sounds correct - Mary Crow is with her in 1851 so I wondered if she was informant at death - did she recall what Mary said in 1851 and was Mary right?

Is she the same Mary Dockery? If she is Peregrine's wife could she be a second wife? Presumably he is 1773 baptism on IGI. Looked for a Mary Jackson born around 1765 in Lincs - oh dear so many.
Logged

Ron was born in Shepherds Bush and "knew" London fairly well
LANKSHEAR EAGLE SKEGGS RUSSELL HAYBALL HALE ROBBINS KING
family history with many research links for everyone at
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~lankshear/
Keith Sherwood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3512


One's native place is the shell of one's soul...


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 13 May 09 07:22 UTC (UK) »

Ron,
Yes, I think I deserve your mild chastisement!  But thanks for having a look around for me.  Mary DOCKERY does indeed appear in the 1841 Census in Ballingdon, Sudbury, Essex - I've started a thread on the Suffolk boards to clarify exactly where that was.  She's had her age rounded down to 70, and is living with her (presumably) daughter Susannah CROW's family.
And yes, there is a plague of Mary Jackson's born at about the right time, just to confuse matters.
I imagine I'm going to have to pay a visit to Lincoln to look in the St Swithin PR's, amongst several others,
Regards, keith
Logged
Selina
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 374



Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 13 May 09 09:09 UTC (UK) »

Hi Keith,

I have a very similar thing with dual use of surnames see
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,169740.0.html.

I was lucky in that THJ read my query and had a Will that appears to contain the answer.

I have still not been able to find a baptism of my Barnabas Stevens/Brighty or the marriage of his mother, Alice surname unknown, who married ? Stevens.

Regards

Selina
Logged
Gaie
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 950


CenInf Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Are all the names listed on one-name websites necessarily interconnected?
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 13 May 09 10:54 UTC (UK) »

Hmm, what an extraordinary name Peregrine Knowles was!

Now I know that the familysearch data is incomplete, but entering his name, all years, England, only brings up his birth/christening and marriage records!!  A familysearchwhack of sorts....  Grin

So he probably wasn't hiding when he added Docker(a)y to his name.

I wondered whether any of his siblings had also adopted the Docker(a)y name.  However, the only other Knowles born in St Marks, Lincoln was Jane b 1733  Huh  No Dockerys christened in the parish. 

Peregrine's parents were William & Mary.  There were no Williams born 1750-1790 to a W&M couple in Lincolnshire; the only Mary to a W&M couple 1750-1790 was ch 18 Jan 1787 in Fiskerton, Lincolnshire (this Batch C028272 also has to a W&M - Hannah 1788, Elizabeth 1789, George 1794, William 1797; no Docker(a)ys christened in the parish).

I cannot see a will for Peregrine on TNA site.

Docker(a)ys and variants 1740-1820 seem to be associated with Cambridgeshire, Cumberland, Lancs, Herts, Yorks.

Keith, do you know Peregrine's occupation?  Or that of his children?

As there is an east coast bias for the Dockery name, could Peregrine have had an association with continental Decroy/Decrois businesses?  Lace making, cloth manufacture, for example?

Kind regards
Gaie
Logged

Sussex, Burwash/Somerset/South London: PANKHURST/FABLING/GREEN/KING/PARROT/POPE/PEMBROKE
Notts/Leics/London: POLLARD/BELAND/FELLS/MORRISON/MARYSON/CLARKE
Northants: MARRIOT/T
Suffolk: LINGLY/LINGLEY/LINDLY/LINDLEY/ SEAGER /SIGGER/SEGGAR/VINCE
Gloucs: WINDOW Glamorgan: JENKINS Cardiganshire: JONES
Poland: OZIEMKIEWICZ France: LINETTE
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT

In loving memory of Eric George Davies, 1934-2009, the father of RootsChat.com































Powered by SMF 1.0.7 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
0.058:17