Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Saturday 28 November 09 23:50 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  General
| |-+  The Common Room
| | |-+  Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Print
Author Topic: Family history is thoroughly corrupted  (Read 2317 times)
joboy
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 924


I really am


Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« on: Sunday 28 June 09 01:38 UTC (UK) »

Family history is thoroughly corrupted by the placement of unsourced material.
Sad as it is the quest to acquire a family tree by 'tapping' into other family trees is now rampant.
What we now have are hundreds,possibly thousands,of trees which are incorrect and corrupted because of material that is unsourced and unverified.
only this morning by using a well advertised programme to see if other people had an interest in a particular person who married a particular person at a particular time and place I found five ..... four of which had the bride married at age 11 .. it so happened that the bride(s)  had identical names and an age difference of 7 years *and* were born 300 miles apart ..... the 5th was a match to my own so I am now pursuing my interest only with the 5th to see if we can conjointly expand on our individual trees.
Looking more closely at the four "failed"others (representing 80% mark you) each had a tree that ran into many thousands ... mine after 20 odd years or so of doing it  boasts of only 704 but I know that I can be as reasonably sure as one can be that it is as correct as possible by verification.
I elected not to place my tree on the net even though I subscribe to that programme preferring rather to see what trees are there that contain families that interest me.
How this problem can be sorted I dont know because the stable door is open ......... but if I can offer a little advice to people who have collected very large trees it would be to scale down to those that you can verify and leave those that you cant on the 'backburner' until you can (if you can),
Joe   
Logged

Gill Australia
Bell Australia
Harding(e) Australia
Jean McGurn
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 609



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 28 June 09 04:24 UTC (UK) »

I stopped updating my  online tree a few years ago when I discovered - again on a well known site - that one of my ancestors who was born in Scotland had been updated by someone to say he was born in Dorset.

I know this because on every English census from 1851 onwards the place of birth is Scotland.

Jean

Logged

McGurn, Stables, Harris, Owens, Bellis, Stackhouse, Darwent, Co(o)mbe
kerryb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 11962



WWW
Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 28 June 09 07:25 UTC (UK) »

I agree Joe

I found one yesterday where there were 5 trees all exactly the same of one of my families that tally with the verified information and with what I have found but the 6th tree had a death in Germany!!!!  The man actually died in Lincs where he was born and lived through 4 census returns.  He died in Lincs, I have the death certificate!

Where the death in Germany came from I can only guess.  I wasn't very good when I started this but now every single bit of information that goes into by tree I give the source, and date found and that gets passed on to anyone I happen to pass the info on to..  I never believe anything given to me until it is verified, as difficult as that can be sometimes and I desperately desperately wish that others would do the same.  Undecided

Kerry
Logged

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website .... www.kerrysfamilyhistory.co.uk
charlotteCH
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3286



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 28 June 09 07:32 UTC (UK) »

Checking  references and  verifying sources  is basic.
I avoid any data passed on which does not tell me the source in such a way that enables me to follow thru and satisfy myself that it's correct, and has been correctly passed on to me.

Trees online are a hazard- and certainly no way to proceed with reliable research.

charlotte
Logged

HARGREAVES, HANSON, BAILEY, BURTON, HEWITT, JAGGER, LOCKWOOD, UTTLEY, RUDD, TAYLOR, HOLDEN, SHAW  Halifax / Sowerby/ Southowram 18C+

GILL, Accrington, Blackburn, West Derby, Lancs, migrated USA 1891 to RI: GILL in SC: HOTCHKISS in RI: PELOQUIN in RI 

HUMPHRIES, HILLIER, ALLEN, LYDBURY  Nunney/Frome 18-19C

HUMPHRIES, JOYCE, HEWITT, ROBINSON, McMULLEN, SUFFEL, CARNEY, MARRON, COMPTON, FREEMAN  Ont. Canada 1830+

PILSEN, Sask.

82nd Regt of Foot 1808-1825
1st WRY Militia 1780-1800
Emjaybee
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2285


Yes I had hair once


Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 28 June 09 08:37 UTC (UK) »

I found my family on a tree with refs to living people, I have asked three times for them to contact me, then requested that all refs to my tree be removed but have received no reply.

I also have most of my relatives on the maternal side included in another tree where all the addresses are quoted with Malvern, Worcester etc all located in USA. I know that is wrong  we have census details from 1841 to prove it.

Bah, don't youj ust get mad?

Mike
Logged

Voyce, in  Hanley Castle, Beardin  Malvern, Scrivens, in Hanley Castle and N.Z.
csh
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 44



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 28 June 09 09:17 UTC (UK) »

Firstly, I do not have my tree on the net.

While browsing Axxxxxxy family trees I come across quite frequently my gt grandfather is named in trees.

I have the shortest genealogy line in history, can name them on one hand., so why does his name crop up.

I check the trees if it is a public tree and cannot see any connection with him and the rest of the tree.

Please understand I might be wrong and is missing the missing link.

Because my line is short obviously I have spread out sidewards to include my gt gt grandfathers brothers and sisters to make my tree interesting for me.

Secondly, if while browsing these trees and you see an obvious mistake do you contact the owner of that tree to correct them.  I dont but I do get irritated by it.

I try to back up and have a paper trail for verification when I can, if not, even my research has a question mark on it.
Logged
mongojoby
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 160


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 28 June 09 09:28 UTC (UK) »

Checking references and verifying sources is basic.
I avoid any data passed on which does not tell me the source in such a way that enables me to follow thru and satisfy myself that it's correct, and has been correctly passed on to me.

Trees online are a hazard- and certainly no way to proceed with reliable research.

charlotte


Completely agree Charlotte.  I do however see all the corrupted trees as a bit of a necessary evil, after being able to find some very useful information in others that has helped in my own research.

Logged
mike175
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 770


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 28 June 09 09:49 UTC (UK) »

When I first started online research, I innocently downloaded information from several online trees. Some of them proved to be valuable links to previously unknown branches, others may well be accurate but I've yet to verify them . . . and then there are some I wish I'd never seen!  Angry

All over the Internet information of all sorts is cut and pasted and errors are replicated to the point where 90% of it is unreliable to say the least. Even some of the news media seem to be guilty of plagiarising dubious "blogs", etc. instead of proper journalistic research but, as serious researchers we're all becoming more aware of the pitfalls and learning to check sources more thoroughly.

So . . . back to verifying sources. It's tedious work, but very satisfying when things fall into place. I just wish I'd been a little more rigorous with my earlier work.

Mike.
Logged

Baskervill - Devon, Foss - Hants, Gentry - Essex, Metherell - Devon, Partridge - Essex/London, Press - Norfolk/London, Stone - Surrey/Sussex, Stuttle - Essex, Wheate - Middlesex/Essex/Coventry/Rutland/Oxfordshire/Staffs, Gibson - Essex
kerryb
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 11962



WWW
Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 28 June 09 09:57 UTC (UK) »

I have a couple of well researched lines in my tree that when I started and knew no better I just copied and pasted to my tree.  However since then through my own research I have found mistakes in that research and also had contact with a some people who have pointed me in the right direction and I am always grateful for their help.

However when I have contacted other researchers because I have found different and verified information why do they have to get so defensive, I don't know how many times I've heard the phrase I've been doing my family tree for XXXX years.  So because they've been doing it for years longer than me, that makes them correct and me wrong.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  It doesn't matter how many years have been spent on a tree, if its wrong, its WRONG!

Yes csh I get irritated too!

Kerry

Logged

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website .... www.kerrysfamilyhistory.co.uk
Nick29
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2904



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 28 June 09 10:01 UTC (UK) »

"I elected not to place my tree on the net even though I subscribe to that programme preferring rather to see what trees are there that contain families that interest me."

That seems rather selfish to me.  If everyone adopted that attitude, what would be the point of sites like Ancestry or GR ?

This topic is discussed in one form or another on quite a regular basis.  The bottom line is that no data can be guaranteed to be 100% accurate, even when documentation is produced.  The father's name on many thousands of certificates simply isn't the correct one, because infidelity and deception was as rife then as it is now, if not more so.

All you can do is to sift through all the evidence at hand, and select the data that best fits, and even then there's no guarantees that it's 100% correct.

Logged

Best Wishes, Nick.

Research interests:
Field - Luton & Islington
Hole - Somerset, Suffolk & Surrey
Farnish, Parker, Cattermole, Last, Wasp, Church - Suffolk
Lewin/Lowin/Lowen - Hertfordhire
Martin - Eltham & Greenwich, Kent (London)
Stead - Greenwich, London (Kent) & Maidstone
Wood - Hertfordshire

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
charlotteCH
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3286



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 28 June 09 10:08 UTC (UK) »

Another thing that is on the nose is when people get hold of photos of living family members and publish then in their "research" without even asking if it's OK to use them... Happened to me recently...  Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry

charlotte
Logged

HARGREAVES, HANSON, BAILEY, BURTON, HEWITT, JAGGER, LOCKWOOD, UTTLEY, RUDD, TAYLOR, HOLDEN, SHAW  Halifax / Sowerby/ Southowram 18C+

GILL, Accrington, Blackburn, West Derby, Lancs, migrated USA 1891 to RI: GILL in SC: HOTCHKISS in RI: PELOQUIN in RI 

HUMPHRIES, HILLIER, ALLEN, LYDBURY  Nunney/Frome 18-19C

HUMPHRIES, JOYCE, HEWITT, ROBINSON, McMULLEN, SUFFEL, CARNEY, MARRON, COMPTON, FREEMAN  Ont. Canada 1830+

PILSEN, Sask.

82nd Regt of Foot 1808-1825
1st WRY Militia 1780-1800
greensleeves
RootsChat Senior
****
Posts: 349


Greensleeves


Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 28 June 09 10:09 UTC (UK) »

I would not claim to be an expert in family trees, but what I have found helpful with on-line links is the sharing of information which then can be used as a guide, rather than taken on face value.  I find that people who are serious researchers are quite happy to email their paperwork to back up their research, and I am delighted to receive it.  However, to just copy and past from on-line trees surely takes all the fun out of the hunt? Well, it would for me, anyway.

I am fortunate that one of my trees, which goes back to about 1540, was researched by my uncle before all the wonderful on-line facilities were available.  This means that he actually had to visit records offices, parishes etc to glean all the information.  In comparison to his contribution, which took him about 30 years to accumulate, mine is quite meagre - I am filling in the gaps, so to speak, and adding some twigs and leaves, always conscious of how hard it must have been for him to get as far as he did.

I can't understand this quest for collecting ancestors like stamps: what interests me are  the people, their stories and the way they lived.  What elation when you find the 'lost' child with an aunt; what pity when you find the young widow with four small children.... To me, that's what family history is all about.

Regards
Greensleeves
Logged

Suffolk: Pearl(e) & variations - Brettenham, Hitcham,Rattlesden; Waddilove - Rattlesden and possibly Norfolk.  Garnham - Belstead, Ipswich & area. 
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick - West Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Leeds, Merrington.
Shadforth - Hartlepool/Stockton
charlotteCH
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 3286



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 28 June 09 10:13 UTC (UK) »

Greensleeves, Yes about the pleasure on feels when learning details of the daily lives of those who are our ancestors and the pity on can feel for them in their griefs and the tough circs many of thme faced. They come alive to one- it has nothing to do with trying to collect huge numbers of names.

charlotte

Logged

HARGREAVES, HANSON, BAILEY, BURTON, HEWITT, JAGGER, LOCKWOOD, UTTLEY, RUDD, TAYLOR, HOLDEN, SHAW  Halifax / Sowerby/ Southowram 18C+

GILL, Accrington, Blackburn, West Derby, Lancs, migrated USA 1891 to RI: GILL in SC: HOTCHKISS in RI: PELOQUIN in RI 

HUMPHRIES, HILLIER, ALLEN, LYDBURY  Nunney/Frome 18-19C

HUMPHRIES, JOYCE, HEWITT, ROBINSON, McMULLEN, SUFFEL, CARNEY, MARRON, COMPTON, FREEMAN  Ont. Canada 1830+

PILSEN, Sask.

82nd Regt of Foot 1808-1825
1st WRY Militia 1780-1800
hamiltonhunt
RootsChat Member
***
Posts: 109



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 28 June 09 10:26 UTC (UK) »

Online trees can be useful for suggesting "possible" connections as long as they are used that way, as possibilities to be proven. I use them as a pointer and then look for verification documents to confirm whether or not if it is valid. So I "analyse" and "cooberate" the information and I don't make my tree public.

If I encounter someone who has strong connections, I contact them to determine if we do connect ask if they are interested in communicating. I still take anything they have with a grain of salt and do my own verification and expect they will do the same with mine.

I have contacted people and told then when I thought they had something wrong and told them what I had found. They then took a look at it with new eyes and if they agreed, corrected it. Sometimes they don't agree but so be it, I have done my best.

I have been able to focus my research more effectively and have learned a lot. Ancestry has allowed me easier access to information than I would never have dreamed of but it is only one tool. And like any tool, it is the person operating it that controls how well it functions. The same goes for the internet in general...

My tree is large because all sides of my family have large families, but i have sources to back it up. Luckley I obtained a lot of source information through the Druoin Collection. I found I had to go both /wide and deep wide since the names were so common and to try to sort out the interconnection of families. 

J
Logged

ARMSTRONG: Ireland, Ontario, Minnesota, Montana, British Columbia   BUCKLEY:  Ireland, Co Cork, Ontario   DONOVAN: Ireland, England   DOOLEY: Ireland   DOWNEY: Ireland   HAMILTON: Co Armagh, Co Tyrone, Penang, Straits Settlements, Somerset, Monmouthshire, Ontario, British Columbia   MACKEY: Ireland, Ontario, British Columbia, Washington, Oregon   McINTYRE: Penang, Straits Settlements, Middlesex   SAWYER: Norfolk, Somerset, Gloucester, Canada
Nick29
RootsChat Aristocrat
******
Posts: 2904



Re: Family history is thoroughly corrupted
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 28 June 09 10:46 UTC (UK) »

Another thing that is on the nose is when people get hold of photos of living family members and publish then in their "research" without even asking if it's OK to use them... Happened to me recently...  Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry

charlotte

Make a complaint to Ancestry - doing this is outside their terms and conditions of use.

Logged

Best Wishes, Nick.

Research interests:
Field - Luton & Islington
Hole - Somerset, Suffolk & Surrey
Farnish, Parker, Cattermole, Last, Wasp, Church - Suffolk
Lewin/Lowin/Lowen - Hertfordhire
Martin - Eltham & Greenwich, Kent (London)
Stead - Greenwich, London (Kent) & Maidstone
Wood - Hertfordshire

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT

In loving memory of Eric George Davies, 1934-2009, the father of RootsChat.com































Powered by SMF 1.0.7 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
1.824:20