Can anyone help - I have a marriage (1847) and death certificate (1865)indicating that James Whordley was a stocktaker but on the two census I have for him, he is down as a labourer at iron works (1851) and a furnaceman (1861) (also on his son's birth cert 1851). Could a stocktaker be the same trade??
Joanna
« Last Edit: Wednesday 08 July 09 11:17 UTC (UK) by JoTH »
Re: Occupation « Reply #1 on: Wednesday 01 July 09 16:18 UTC (UK) »
Hi Joanna
i've done some Googling and have found that there was such an occupation as a stocktaker at an iron works. I'm not sure what it involved.
e.g:
Quote
William Hancock, the father of our subject, was born at Lainesfield, Staffordshire, Eng. it is thought, in 1812. He became a stock-taker and iron finisher of expert skill, and established a reputation in that line of work.
Re: Occupation « Reply #7 on: Friday 03 July 09 11:44 UTC (UK) »
In the 60's I was employed as a "storeman & packer", my group certificate said I was a "stocktaker", in fact I was a general dogsbody/labourer. I did keep the weekly stock records tho'. Leonie.
Re: Occupation « Reply #8 on: Friday 03 July 09 11:47 UTC (UK) »
Think this might different from the usual meaning of stocktaker, Leonie. It seems to occur quite a lot in the iron industry in the 19th century, as Jackie has found.
They might have been responsible for ensuring that the supplies were adequate but it's strange that it's not described anywhere.