|
|
|
|
jaybeebuzz
RootsChat Member
  
Posts: 106

|
Looks to me like Naval Service Personnel Records. If you Google it comes up with a number of explanations. One site states:
"The Registers of Seamen's Services give the Service Records of rating who joined the Royal Navy between 1873 and 1923. They do not cover service after 1928".
This is an old thread on Rootschat: "You can now search and download the service registers of more than 500,000 ratings (non-Officer crew member) who joined the Royal Navy between 1853 and 1923. The Registers of Seamen's Services will help you find details about your ancestor's birth, their occupation and which ship or ships they served on, and in the later records, a description of their physical appearance."
Julie
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
BALLARD & TINSON - WORCESTERSHIRE (ESP WYRE PIDDLE) SCRIVENS & PINCHIN - GLOUCESTERSHIRE GREEN - Bilston, Staffs, Llanelli, Wales BURROUGHS - Chilmark, Wilts, & Camberwell, London LISSENDEN - Whitstable, Kent EVERSHAM - Herefordshire
|
|
|
|
|
km1971
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2722
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Most men were discharged from the army aged 30 to 35. If his service record survived it should therefore be in the section for men discharged 1883 to 1900. Luckily you do not need to know his regiment as they are filed alphabetically.
At present you will have to visit Kew and obtain a readers ticket. Findmypast will be putting them online by 2011.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/militaryhistory/army/step4.htm
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
km1971
RootsChat Aristocrat
     
Posts: 2722
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
We need to go back to your first post. You said he was in the 1911 census for Galway down as an Army pensioner and Farm Labourer. But you posted a link to the service record of a RN man.
You later said you thought he may not have been in the army. But the census record would have been completed by him, and you can see it has not been added to by the enumerator. I would have thought that they are for different men.
To be aged 48 in 1911 he would have been born c1862, so five years out from the RN man.
ken
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|