|
Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: francis kent (Read 111 times)
|
chris47
RootsChat Senior
Posts: 292
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Hello , me again.
If it is ok please could someone lookup on the 1901 census:
Francis Kent , age 11 , addlestone surrey.
Thanks again....chris.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
haylor,chertsey,surrey,sussex,windsor
watling,sydenham,lewisham.
kent,berkshire.
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
Hi Chris - whats the source of 'Addlestone', related to your lad ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
Only births I can see ... Greater London, plus specific Middx & Surrey
are you meaning that you think he was in Addlestone in 1901, but may have been born elsewhere?
Births Mar 1889
Kent Frank Reuben Camberwell 1d 941
~~~~~~~~
Births Dec 1889
Kent Frank Greenwich 1d 1108
~~~~~~~~
Births Jun 1892
Kent Francis William Hackney 1b 5_4
Kent Frank Harrison H Greenwich 1d 1030
~~~~~~~~
Births Sep 1892
Kent Frank John Edmonton 3a 436
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chris47
RootsChat Senior
Posts: 292
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Hello curmudgeon.
Thanks for your message.
We saw Francis on the 1901 census we thought Francis was born in Addlestone.
You could be right , we just took it for granted , born elswhere.
Very sorry.
chris.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
haylor,chertsey,surrey,sussex,windsor
watling,sydenham,lewisham.
kent,berkshire.
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
I couldnt see a Fra* Kent in the Addlestone area in 1901 census - can you add any more details of what you saw and I'd be happy to flesh out from the original page.
ADDED:-
Ah, maybe its an Ancestry site problem, as I see him on the 'official' 1901 census as being in the Chertsey area, born Addlestone .... dont have the funds to drill deeper, so I'll try and find out why he's not showing up in Ancestry search engine...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
yes,possible mis-tran:-
1901 - RG13/592; Folio: 39; Page: 21 - Chertsey
38, Victoria Road
Harriett S Kent [sic] 47 WIDOW Head Laundress Sussex, Brighton
William 'Skeet' 17 son Milkman Addlestone
Charles 'Skeet' 15 son Labourer do
Francis 'Skeet' (dittoed from incorrect transcription of mother) 11 son Addlestone
George 'Skeet' 9 son do
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
actually, its moot if the 'official' 1901 census you quoted has it wrong, or the Ancestry entry (which has mum Harriett shown as Harriet SKeet in their index, altho I think the image looks like Harriet S Kent !)
However, looking at the 1891 census, I think Ancestry was right, as the family show up as Skeats (and another anomaly is that Francis is shown as age 3 or perhaps 5 ....)
Let me know if you wish to pursue it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chris47
RootsChat Senior
Posts: 292
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
Hello , curmudgeon.
Many Thanks for all your help.
We are very gratefull indeed.
One of Dads middle name is Francis.
Another Family member ( kent ) ,her Grandfathers middle name is also....yes....Francis.
Once again....THANK YOU.
CHRIS.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
haylor,chertsey,surrey,sussex,windsor
watling,sydenham,lewisham.
kent,berkshire.
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
Pleasure Chris, glad it was of use 
(I'm only occasionally cantankerous, and greatly misunderstood  )
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chris47
RootsChat Senior
Posts: 292
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
actually, its moot if the 'official' 1901 census you quoted has it wrong, or the Ancestry entry (which has mum Harriett shown as Harriet SKeet in their index, altho I think the image looks like Harriet S Kent !)
However, looking at the 1891 census, I think Ancestry was right, as the family show up as Skeats (and another anomaly is that Francis is shown as age 3 or perhaps 5 ....)
Let me know if you wish to pursue it?
I am on the library computer....3 mins left.
Sorry im a bit slow.
do you think it is skeat rather than kent?
i have no computer at home....chris.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
haylor,chertsey,surrey,sussex,windsor
watling,sydenham,lewisham.
kent,berkshire.
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
Its looking that way - sorry if I've missed you.
1881 - RG11; Piece: 769; Folio: 34; Page: 23 - Chertsey
and the marriage of Francis parents:-
Marriages Mar 1881
SKEATS William Chertsey vol 2a page 32 to WATTS Harriet
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Necromancer
RootsChat Marquessate
Posts: 18081
I've updated my profile ......
|
and their kids Birth Index entries:-
Births Sep 1881
Skeats Mabel Ada Chertsey 2a 44
~~~~~~~~
Births Sep 1883
Skeats William James Chertsey 2a 44
~~~~~~~~
Births Dec 1885
Skeats Charles Thomas Chertsey 2a 41
~~~~~~~~
Births Dec 1888
SKEATS Francis Stanley Chertsey 2a 30
~~~~~~~~
Births Jun 1891
Skeats George Walter Chertsey 2a 45
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chris47
RootsChat Senior
Posts: 292
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
|
and their kids Birth Index entries:-
Births Sep 1881
Skeats Mabel Ada Chertsey 2a 44
~~~~~~~~
Births Sep 1883
Skeats William James Chertsey 2a 44
~~~~~~~~
Births Dec 1885
Skeats Charles Thomas Chertsey 2a 41
~~~~~~~~
Births Dec 1888
SKEATS Francis Stanley Chertsey 2a 30
~~~~~~~~
Births Jun 1891
Skeats George Walter Chertsey 2a 45
Hello curmudgeon.
Many Thanks for all your help.
We were all sure this was the Francis....Addlestone , etc.
You maybe right, he could have been born elsewhere.
The lady who we email to is my Dads Uncles , Granddaughter, ( a member here on rootschat sent a message for me to the lady who was on Genes ).
Thanks again....chris.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
haylor,chertsey,surrey,sussex,windsor
watling,sydenham,lewisham.
kent,berkshire.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
|
