Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Sunday 06 December 09 16:58 UTC (UK)
Welcome Home Help Surnames Library Shop Search Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: RootsChat has moved to a new home RootsChat has moved onto a new server, so we may have a few teething problems.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  London and Middlesex
| | | |-+  London & Middlesex Lookup Requests
| | | | |-+  London & Middlesex Completed Lookup Requests (Moderators: dawnsh, Valda)
| | | | | |-+  So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven  (Read 285 times)
Ouse who
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 48


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« on: Tuesday 03 November 09 19:38 UTC (UK) »

The death registration of my wife's g g grandmother showed that she had died a violent death in St Pancras in 1861. The document indicated manslaughter against Henry Rayner. The Ancestry Old Bailey index showed a man by that name was aquitted of the manslaughter an un-named person and disharged.

The Old Bailey website had no mention of this at all, so we went to Kew to inspect the Indictment records for that period, CRIM/4/642 and 4/643 to try and shed further light on the case.

We were in for a big surprise. Henry Rayner 'late of St Pancras' was indicted in early September for the felonious slaying and killing of the following people;

Elizabeth Allen
George Henry Bolton
Clara Maria Clements
Emma English
Henry Greenwood (7)
Charles Greenwood (11)
Edward Hills
Rhoda Bowler Oliver
Benjamin Rushbrook
Charles Standring
Richard Saunders
Mary Sillis
Eve Stacey
John Yeomans

Apparently the cases were not found and he was acquitted and discharged.  We didn't manage to find what happened in the case of Sarah Essex and Charles Cox whose names appear a few weeks later. Perhaps there are more names.  Cry

Can anyone explain the circumstances? 

Kind regards, O. 
"Without prejudice"   Cheesy
Logged

Brightman, Bowler, Johnson, May, Maynard, Purser, Underwood, Young.
Rockford
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 90


Smoky Rooftops, Luss


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 20:05 UTC (UK) »

Hi O.

Did the Key records provide any details of the circumstances?  The Times and Scotsman Newspapers of September 1861 refer to a serious railway accident where a passenger train and a freight train collided in the Clayton Tunnel, described as being at Hampstead Junction.

Henry Rayner was a signalman at Kentish Town and there seems to have been a lot of discussion at the inquest - reported in the Times of 11 September 1861- whether there was a danger signal showing for one of the trains.

I can't find anything about the actual court case and the reasons for his acquittal, although Charles Cox was a witness at the inquest and was described as being in great pain - I assume he must have died from his injuries some time later.

Best wishes

Brian

Logged

Burnside [Londonderry, Lothians and Pennsylvania]
Thorburn [Lanarkshire]
Sweeney [Donegal/Lanarkshire]
Gilchrist [Lanarkshire, Peebles, Lothians]
Smith [Dunbartonshire, Lanarkshire, Lothians]
Gregory [Bucks, Wales]
Vair [Melrose]
Bennett [Somerset, Wales]
Letherby/Howlett/Phipps [Somerset]
Gwynne [New Monkland, Stirling, Midlothian]
Hunter [New Monkland, Fife]
Logie/Dunlop/Thomson/Young [West Lothian]
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 5154


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 20:20 UTC (UK) »

Oddly the various modern references online to the 1861 Clayton Tunnel accident show it as having taken place 5 miles from Brighton (so not in the St Pancras/Kentish Town/Hampstead area) and the signalman to have been Henry Killick rather than Henry Rayner Huh

See e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clayton_Tunnel_rail_crash
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
heywood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 8294



Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 20:32 UTC (UK) »

There seems to be quite a bit about Clayton Tunnel- here's more:

http://www.vobes.com/clayton.php

http://ukhrail.uel.ac.uk/glossary/clayton.html

Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Alexander, Suffolk and Lancashire; Ashworth,Whitworth, Grindrod Lancashire; Golden, Duffy County Mayo.
Ouse who
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 48


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 20:35 UTC (UK) »

Hi Brian,

We only got as far as the Indictment records, but were planning to continue our search at Kew because there seemed to be so much info that was not mentioned on the Old Bailey website. I would strongly recommend that anyone who finds Old Bailey mentioned anywhere in their records, visits Kew;  we would never have learnt what we did today by just going on-line.

We haven't looked at the newspapers, that was our next action; we guessed that that number of deaths could not have gone unreported.  The death registration for my wife's g g grandmother 2 September 1861 says "died on the road to the University Hospital Saint Pancras". The inquest was held on 10 September.

A railway accident - we should have thought of that! I have ammended my post.

Thank you for that.

Kind regards, O.
Logged

Brightman, Bowler, Johnson, May, Maynard, Purser, Underwood, Young.
Ouse who
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 48


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 21:07 UTC (UK) »

I have found another site, RailwayArchive - where the accident report can be downloaded:

http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/docSummary.php?docID=349

No mention of Henry Rayner in that either. Need to explore more methinks.

Regards, O.
Logged

Brightman, Bowler, Johnson, May, Maynard, Purser, Underwood, Young.
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 5154


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 21:21 UTC (UK) »

It's clear from the Times inquest reports that the Hampstead Junction collision (2 September 1861, Henry Rayner the signalman at Kentish Town) was different from the Clayton Tunnel one (25 Aug 1861).

Incidentally, there is reference to some of the Hampstead Junction victims on http://thevirtualtourofhampstead.co.uk/timesarchive.htm

Anna Smiley
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
heywood
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 8294



Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 21:24 UTC (UK) »

Thanks for that- Anna. That's better.
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Alexander, Suffolk and Lancashire; Ashworth,Whitworth, Grindrod Lancashire; Golden, Duffy County Mayo.
avm228
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 5154


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 21:42 UTC (UK) »

Brief reference here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentish_Town_rail_accident
Logged

Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)
jorose
RootsChat Marquessate
********
Posts: 4672



Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 21:52 UTC (UK) »

http://newspapers.bl.uk/blcs/ - seems to have several entries on the trial of Henry Rayner. You'd have to pay to see the full details, but the snatches I see seem to suggest that the jury were predisposed to be lenient towards him because of his age (19).

I think he is in the 1861 census at 71 Union Street, Pancras, with his family. He was b. Abbots Langley, Herts, and his father Joseph was a railway porter (Henry is listed as 'railway servant').

In 1871 and 1881 it seems he's moved to Lambeth and married to a Sophia (an older woman). No children.

ETA: His name on these records is always spelt "Raynor", as it is on the Accident Returns linked from the wiki page. It seems from reading that those in charge of investigating the accident felt Henry, who was 19 and had only been working on the railway for eight months, should not have been in such a position of responsibility.
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Ouse who
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 48


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 03 November 09 21:52 UTC (UK) »

Thank you all,

Definitely the Kentish Town accident.

I found a mention on  http://news.google.com/archivesearch; an article referring to an accident on "The North London line", which mentioned one of the names on my list;

http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=DSC18611203.2.17

The Accident report, which mentions young Henry Rayner:

http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_KentishTown1861.pdf

Kind regards, O.



Logged

Brightman, Bowler, Johnson, May, Maynard, Purser, Underwood, Young.
Rockford
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 90


Smoky Rooftops, Luss


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 04 November 09 08:17 UTC (UK) »

Hi

Roll Eyes

Apologies for mixing up the Clayton Tunnel and Hampstead Junction accidents in my earlier post.  That's what I get for skim reading!

Best wishes

Brian
Logged

Burnside [Londonderry, Lothians and Pennsylvania]
Thorburn [Lanarkshire]
Sweeney [Donegal/Lanarkshire]
Gilchrist [Lanarkshire, Peebles, Lothians]
Smith [Dunbartonshire, Lanarkshire, Lothians]
Gregory [Bucks, Wales]
Vair [Melrose]
Bennett [Somerset, Wales]
Letherby/Howlett/Phipps [Somerset]
Gwynne [New Monkland, Stirling, Midlothian]
Hunter [New Monkland, Fife]
Logie/Dunlop/Thomson/Young [West Lothian]
mc8
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Posts: 935



Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 04 November 09 21:19 UTC (UK) »

poor lad   Sad
Logged

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Ouse who
RootsChat Extra
**
Posts: 48


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio


Re: So what was it about Henry Rayner? 16 Manslaughter charges, not proven
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 04 November 09 22:22 UTC (UK) »

I agree mc8.

I had no idea when I posted my enquiry what my wife and I were going to learn about her gg grandmother's death in 1861. Today we read several newspaper articles about the accident, the subsequent inquest and enquiry.

There was a surprising amount on the Internet about the accident, which according to the BBC website was the first major rail accident in London. It all made for pretty grim reading; some of the first newspaper reports didn't spare the gory details of the injuries sustained by the dead and the badly injured.

Thanks again for all the help, O.

NB. eBay had the page from Illustrated London News which had a litho-type print of the accident scene.







Logged

Brightman, Bowler, Johnson, May, Maynard, Purser, Underwood, Young.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.047:20