Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Monday 13 October 08 12:02 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Ad: 1861 England and Wales Census complete index with images now available - Click Here

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  England (Counties as in 1851-1901)
| |-+  England - General
| | |-+  Middlesex (Moderators: dawnsh, Valda)
| | | |-+  1861 Middx census - Berkshire?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 1861 Middx census - Berkshire?  (Read 321 times)
hlbradd
RootsChat Veteran
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 655



1861 Middx census - Berkshire?
« on: Saturday 30 April 05 09:32 BST (UK) »

Hi

Saw this on another list and thought it might help if you can't find your ancestors in 1861 on Ancestry.

"Take care!!!
The whole of the County of Middlesex (outside of Greater London) has
been filed as Berkshire!!!"

  Roll Eyes
Berks! Tongue

H
Logged

Warwickshire - ADKINS / KENNARD
Hertfordshire - BRADD / ROBLETT / THOROGOOD / WATSON
ABURN - BLANKS - BLOGG - BURGESS - FERRY - FREEMAN - GOODRICK - GOTTY -MEECH - MIDDLEDITCH -  RUSSELL - PLANT - THURSTON

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Elektra
RootsChat Extra
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 74



Re: 1861 Middx census - Berkshire?
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 03 May 05 11:38 BST (UK) »

and I notice a lot of Surrey parishes have been placed in Kent !
Logged
SteveSims
RootsChat Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


English + Irish + Welsh + Scots + German = Aussie


Re: 1861 Middx census - Berkshire?
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 07 May 05 14:11 BST (UK) »

Actually, most of Middlesex appears ok - but the registration districts of Barnet and Edmonton (at least) have been indexed under Berkshire.

This seems to be because for 1861, these two RDs have high out-of-sequence piece numbers - in high 700's, while most of Middlesex runs from 000's to 100's. Other 700's are in Berkshire.

I have informed Ancestry and pointed out what the problem is (that they don't seem to have allowed for out-of-sequence piece numbers) - and that the problem probably affects various RDs in other counties. However (strangely) they have got all those notorious "Welsh" pieces in Herefordshire right!

Apart from this glitch, I'm really surprised at how good the indexing is in general! Have found lots of AWOL ancestors already... using "less is more" principle when searching...

Steve
Logged

My English ancestry from Berkshire Buckingham Cumberland Gloucester Hereford Hampshire Lancashire London Somerset Staffordshire Warwick Wiltshire Worcester Yorkshire ... so far
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
0.256:21