Welcome, Guest. Please login or register for free.
Did you miss your activation email?
Friday 29 August 08 22:33 BST (UK)
Welcome Home Help Shop Search Calendar Login Register
Search Images 

Online
 
  First Name(s)

Last Name

 
News: Not only is RootsChat totally free, but you can have FREE WEBSPACE  too for your family history or local history webpages.

+  RootsChat.Com
|-+  Beginners
| |-+  How to Use RootsChat
| | |-+  RootsChat Performance: how can we help ?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Print
Author Topic: RootsChat Performance: how can we help ?  (Read 6188 times)
Berlin-Bob
Global Moderator
RootsChat Marquessate
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5077


by My Daughter. Chatting to find her Roots !


Re: RootsChat Performance: how can we help ?
« Reply #60 on: Thursday 10 January 08 20:50 GMT (UK) »

Hi

the "search" facility on RootsChat is not the best,
and this is one reason why I started the "RootsChat Topics: ......" Series,
and later, the RootsChat Lexicon.

The thought was, that many people have similar queries, so if we gather together links to the most informative postings on any subject, then members can look here first, thereby cutting down the load on the "Search RootsChat" routine, which is very resource hungry.


I've now moved the lexicon and the "*** A Catalogue of RootsChat Topics ***" to
http://surname.rootschat.com/lexicon/index.php
to make them easier to use.

If you have any ideas, how to improve these, there is a link for suggestions on the lexicon 'home-page'.  Smiley

Bob
Logged

Searching for Coleman, Moore, Kallnung in London; Margulies, Remenyi in E. Europe;
Ancestors of Hessie Stevenson-Coleman-Baxter (Ireland, 1861)
and, of course, any other ancestors for my web-site http://boco.rootschat.net

All Census Data included in this post is Crown Copyright (see: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk)
anjon2
RootsChat Pioneer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


ISO my WILSON Cumberland-born GGGgrandparents-b. 1790-1796
« Reply #61 on: Thursday 24 January 08 14:12 GMT (UK) »

 
You've probably all noticed (and suffered  Sad ) when RootsChat has outages, "go slows" etc.

This is a typical response:
Has anyone else been having problems accessing RootsChat yesterday (31 December) and today (31 January)?

As you can guess, I've had problems - receiving the "try again in an hour" page, on both days.   I have had no problems accessing other popular websites, eg BBC etc.

[...]

And, is there anything we should do as Rootschatters to reduce the risk of this "freeze out" occurring?

Annoying, but we all have to live with it Sad

However . . .
Quote
And, is there anything we should do as Rootschatters to reduce the risk of this "freeze out" occurring ?

Yes, there is Smiley

1)  Images on RootsChat

Those of us who use broadband tend to forget how many people there are, who still use slow dial-up connections.
So anything that speeds up page downloads is an improvement. Even on Broadband !

When we call up a page in the browser (i.e. click on a link) then the page, text and graphics, is downloaded to our computer, whereby "graphics" includes avatars, smileys (both in the text and in the signatur), and images attatched to the text

1) On 15 replies to a topic (maximum replies per page), up to 15 profile pics are downloaded.
(that's the worst case: if it's just two people, answering back and forth, then only two profile pics get downloaded)

I downloaded two RootsChat pages, one with just one avatar (profile pic) and one with 10:
The text part of each page was about 100 KB
The graphics part of the 1st. page was 60 KB   
The graphics part of the 2nd. page was 250 KB

Doing the maths, nearly 200 KB of the 2nd. page was taken up with avatars and smileys.

Most people have an avatar/profile pic of 10 KB or less, which is reasonable,
but I have noticed some bigger avatars, one even going to 65KB.
(update: I've since seen two, over 150 KB !)

So please keep this in mind when choosing a profile pic, as we can all benefit from faster page loads.


2) Images attached to replies also need download time. 
Obviously, for the Photo Restoration board, they need to be big,
so that the restorers have the best 'raw material" to work with,
and some of the "can someone recognise/decipher this ?" images may need to be big,
but images on other boards can be smaller, especially snap-shots
(see replies #2, and #3 about a voluntary code of conduct.

Please try to keep larger images to a maximum width of 600 - 700 pixels. 
This reduces the overall size, improves download times,  and also, very important,
avoids 'screen stretching', where we have to keep scrolling right and left to see a picture.
Remember that many of us use use laptops and notebooks with a screen width of 1024 pixels,
or even older computers with a screen width of 800 pixels.

Thanks,   Smiley Smiley
Bob

see Topic: Adding images to Posting & Profiles
1) Resizing and cropping your image file:[/color]
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,130922.0.html


ps:
I've now edited my signature, as the two smileys there were nearly 10 KB (animated GIFs !!)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Print 
« previous next »


[Copyright] [Free RootsChat Webspace] [Your Surname Interests] [Shrink Link] [About Us] [Terms of Use]
All Census Lookups are Crown Copyright, National Archives for academic and non-commercial research purposes only
RootsChat.com cannot be held responsible directly or indirectly for the messages or content posted by others. Inline images in messages are the copyright of the respective linked sites.
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
1.1:22