Author Topic: Marriage of John Lakin  (Read 3305 times)

Offline Suzy W

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,412
  • The only way forward is backwards
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 16 July 14 02:23 BST (UK) »
I think I could cross out Mary Bee, as the marriage took place in 1766, unless this is a second marriage for John Lakin to another Mary?  First wife Mary Hinkley

I have found four births all daughters for a John and Mary Lakin dating from 1763 to 1781, a large time frame of five years between the first child born 1763 and the second 1768.

I will fully understand not all records will be on Family Search.

Suzy W
TEW family of Leire/Leicester and New Zealand
MERRICKS of Stafford/Birmingham
PENTECOST of Surrey and New Zealand
POTENTIER of France, England and Canada
WATKINS of London and New Zealand
WHITAKER of Guiseley Yorkshire and New Zealand
LYALL, of Dundee, Caithness and New Zealand

And far too many to add

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 16 July 14 07:19 BST (UK) »
I will fully understand not all records will be on Family Search.
Suzy W

AND, as they too are transcriptions, mistakes do happen.  I was looking at the parish records for someone else recently, and found that the original entry for a baptism was son of John and SARAH, whilst Family Search had transcribed it as John and MARY.  Nor, in a lot of cases, are the entries complete copies of the original entries.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,062
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 16 July 14 11:40 BST (UK) »
If you have access Staffordshire parish register images are on FindMyPast  ::)
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 16 July 14 16:10 BST (UK) »
I've just returned from Lichfield -

John Lakin and Mary Hinckley - St Modwen, Burton on Trent - BANNS only.  rRad on 28 October and 4 and 11 November 1759.  The above publication to Stapenhill.

Lichfield do not have parish records for Stapenhill.

St Michael and All Angels, Hamstall Ridware
11 February 1766 by Licence.  John Lakin (x) of the parish of Rugeley and Mary Bee (x) widow.

I looked at the licence which gives the additional information - John Lakin is 24 and a Hatter, Mary Bee is 30 and a widow.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY


Offline Suzy W

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,412
  • The only way forward is backwards
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 17 July 14 05:05 BST (UK) »
Thanks for having a little look for me.

Put me in the right direction if I am wrong.  If Elizabeth was born in Burton Upon Trent, that would make James Lakin and Mary Hinkley more likely to be her parents?

If the math is right with John and Mary Bee, he would of been born abt 1742.
So if this is the same John who married Mary Hinkley he would of been 18 years old at the time.

How far apart is Burton Upon Trent to Rugeley?

Suzy W

TEW family of Leire/Leicester and New Zealand
MERRICKS of Stafford/Birmingham
PENTECOST of Surrey and New Zealand
POTENTIER of France, England and Canada
WATKINS of London and New Zealand
WHITAKER of Guiseley Yorkshire and New Zealand
LYALL, of Dundee, Caithness and New Zealand

And far too many to add

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 17 July 14 07:05 BST (UK) »
Rugeley to Burton, by today's roads is somewhere in the region of 18 miles.

From Elizabeth's baptism in 1763, then the marriage of John and Mary Hinckley is the most likely.

And I've just realised, by looking at the map, that it is very strange that Lichfield does not have the parish records for Stapenhill, as it is situated on the outskirts of modern-day Burton  :-\  However, GENUKI tells me that until 1894 it was in Derbyshire, and so did not come under the Diocese of Lichfield.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,084
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 17 July 14 07:36 BST (UK) »
From GenUKI:

Stapenhill
This place was an ancient parish in county Derby and became a modern Civil Parish when those were established.

The parish included the townships of Stapenhill, Caldwell and Stanton and Newhall. Caldwell split off and became a separate Civil Parish.

This parish was in the ancient Reton and Gresley Hundred (or Wapentake).

In March, 1904, this Civil Parish was abolished and the parish amalgamated into Burton upon Trent Civil Parish.


Derbyshire Record Office holds the Parish Registers from 1679 to 1910. Available on CD (CD/85).
http://www.derbyshire.gov.uk/leisure/record_office/records/default.asp
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline Suzy W

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,412
  • The only way forward is backwards
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage of John Lakin
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 17 July 14 22:27 BST (UK) »
Thank you.  I wondered why I got Derbyshire for some records.  Being in NZ I thought it was a totally different area to Stafford, so that clears that one up for me.

Suzy W
TEW family of Leire/Leicester and New Zealand
MERRICKS of Stafford/Birmingham
PENTECOST of Surrey and New Zealand
POTENTIER of France, England and Canada
WATKINS of London and New Zealand
WHITAKER of Guiseley Yorkshire and New Zealand
LYALL, of Dundee, Caithness and New Zealand

And far too many to add