Just some feedback from me regarding the value if wills which is why I'd recommend looking at the will of the weaver. In another branch of my family (no, not our friend Harriet Flute!) I've been aided by someone who turns out to be descended from a Bitchener blacksmith born in early 1700's while I'm descended from the brother, a tailor. I'd assumed that because their descendants were agricultural workers that the family had always been ag labs, however thanks to her we have traced wills from that core family back into the 1500's in North Crawley. We feel satisfied that after all the research we've found the core group. Various wills show up with all kind of spelling variations on the basic name, from North Crawley and one from Turvey.
What you gain in looking is a general picture of who they were and what made them tick, assuming you feel as if you've found 'your original lot' around Stoke Goldington. Whether in our case, again with variations on spelling, it's a man dying, willing money to repair the North Crawley bells, or a man insisting a certain son gets the 'shood cart' (cart with metal rims), another man who has little to leave than his dead wife's best kerchief and a kettle, or yet another who wishes to leave his half grown son 'his best horse' but is adamant that his wife shouldn't be the one to choose it, it's all fascinating even though the translation can be challenging. As long as you have found the correct root name, place or relatively small geographic area it has it's own different kind of value.
I reread the long thread from 2013 you shared mostly with John where you successfully and painstakingly traced the Wrights to the point where you are now.
Just my thoughts on the subject of old wills from the 1500's and 1600's even if in actual fact they might be a cousin or uncle's will as it relates to your actual ancestor. Some things you might never know and no amount of digging may provide your complete tree, but the time snapshot and the proximity to where they lived side by side or a walk across the fields has its own merit.