Author Topic: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots  (Read 1461 times)

Offline las camelias

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ********
  • Posts: 685
  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
    • View Profile
Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« on: Thursday 18 September 14 19:13 BST (UK) »
Attached photograph taken following the marriage of Dora Brock to Edward Noon, Broughton (Hants) Chapel, 1910.

One of the men in the back row is likely to be Charles Morley Brock, younger brother of the bride. 
Does anyone know which one it is likely to be, according to Victorian etiquette?  Charles was killed in action during WW1.

Thank you
LC

Offline Brit2015

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 20 September 14 05:50 BST (UK) »
 :)

Offline las camelias

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ********
  • Posts: 685
  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 20 September 14 08:27 BST (UK) »
Oh my, how fantastic is that Brit2015!  Thank you very much indeed.  I didn't post to get a restore, but am so pleased you took the time and trouble.  Again, thank you.

I was hoping someone might know the Victorian etiquette on who stood where in wedding photos in relation to the bride and groom, but sadly no response.

Regards
LC

Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,424
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 20 September 14 08:45 BST (UK) »
I think it is Edwardian rather than Victorian  ;)  Victoria died in 1901. 

Don't you just love those huge Hats.  Wouldn't want to be behind them at the cinema though!  ;)

China might be around soon - when she wakes up - she loves huge hats - and Jim might drop in with some words of wisdom on etiquette  -  When he gets up.


- but I don't know the answer to your query!   Sorry

Nice work Brit.

Wiggy    :)
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.


Offline las camelias

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ********
  • Posts: 685
  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 20 September 14 09:14 BST (UK) »
Yes, of course it's Edwardian, Wiggy - the fingers racing ahead on the keyboard with the mind on something else no doubt!

Cheers

LC

Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,424
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 20 September 14 09:24 BST (UK) »
Well the Edwardians really went to town on their fashions didn't they!  Talk about OTT!!     ;D
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.

Offline Brit2015

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 21 September 14 17:38 BST (UK) »
Hi again ...  I'm thinking that if the bride's father is standing behind her, then her brothers are on either side of him, making the bride's family on the left and the groom's brothers and father on the right !  Just a thought

Offline aus*jen

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 804
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #7 on: Monday 22 September 14 00:27 BST (UK) »
Agree with Brit.  The man on the extreme left is not wearing a flower in his buttonhole
so perhaps not a close family member unless of course the bride had 2 brothers!
Think it is likely to be the young man standing behind the groom who would have served
in WW1.

Regards,
Jen.
Boland   NSW, Australia
Gibbs   S.Aust. & Queensland
Jennings NSW, Australia
Page  Coventry UK, Queensland Aust.
Sellars (Sellard) Gloucestershire
Kirby  Lechlade, Gloucestershire
Hampshire  Stepney, Middlesex & Hampshire
Goddard,  Isle of Wight
Cushen, Isle of Wight
Keys,  Tyrone Ireland & NSW Australia

Offline las camelias

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Veteran
  • ********
  • Posts: 685
  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
    • View Profile
Re: Victorian Etiquette in Wedding Phots
« Reply #8 on: Monday 22 September 14 08:56 BST (UK) »
Thanks folks! You are all very kind.  It was just to get an image in my mind of what Charles might have looked like.

LC