RootsChat.Com

Research in Other Countries => Australia => Topic started by: Jang on Monday 21 August 17 13:41 BST (UK)

Title: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: Jang on Monday 21 August 17 13:41 BST (UK)
Ancestry have recently released  a new record set - "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"

I can't access these records, even though I have a Heritage Plus sub. I've sent them numerous emails with no reply - very frustrating.

I'm particularly interested in the record for Enid Elgar Coulson, that is, if she was born in 1912.

Can anyone tell me if this is the case?

Jan


 
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: groom on Monday 21 August 17 13:46 BST (UK)
Enid Elgar Coulson was born 8th March 1912 and baptised on the 10th July the same year. Her mother was Mary. There is the name Edward written above Mary, but that has been crossed out.
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers
Post by: Jang on Monday 21 August 17 13:51 BST (UK)
Thanks so much, that fits with the Enid Coulson I have :-)
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: rosball on Monday 21 August 17 22:44 BST (UK)
Place of abode is Tuckhall  ???

Ros
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
Post by: Jang on Tuesday 22 August 17 01:24 BST (UK)
Thanks Ros. That's a mystery - I can't find any Sydney suburbs that are even close. I know Mary Coulson was living in Darlinghurst when Enid was born and in Camperdown the following year.
Title: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: majm on Tuesday 22 August 17 01:30 BST (UK)
Page 194
Baptisms administered in the Cathedral of St Andrew, Sydney, in the County of Cumberland in the Year 1912
When baptised  July 10
(Line entry number) 2455  (Jang, the docment does not say ‘Line entry number’, they are my words)
When born  March 9  1912
Child’s Christian Name  Enid Elgar
Parents’ Names   Edward (struck through)  Mary COULSON,
Quality or Profession  NO remarks in ink, possible pencil remarks.
Abode  Leichhardt
Reverend:  C H Clark

I comment:
It is very likely that there’s ‘pencil’ comments entered by the clergyman.  I ‘think’ I can read the word ‘married’ adjacent to Edward and above Coulson.    There’s SIX possible words in pencil.    I am quite sure that clergy would record pencil comments where they may have had information about the parentage, but were aware of no formal marriage between the couple.

Perhaps it would be sensible to send email enquiry to Anglican Diocese Office in Sydney and wait for their reply ... could take a while for that reply !

JM
Title: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: majm on Tuesday 22 August 17 01:31 BST (UK)
attaching hard to read pencil remarks

JM
Title: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: majm on Tuesday 22 August 17 01:33 BST (UK)
Place of abode is Tuckhall  ???

Ros

I read it as Leichhardt

JM
Title: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, "
Post by: majm on Tuesday 22 August 17 01:38 BST (UK)
It is of course possible that the 'pencil' comments are NOT pencil comments, but bleed throughs from the other side of the page.    August 4 1869 may well be a bleed through into the 'blank' box in the image I attached.

JM
Title: Re: Ancestry problem
Post by: majm on Tuesday 22 August 17 01:58 BST (UK)
As an aside,  one of my elderly rellies has phoned to assure me that C H Clark was assistant at St Andrew's Cathedral and he would be Charles Henry William CLARK, whose son was the Australian historian, Manning Clark.

cable clergy index:  http://anglicanhistory.org/aus/cci/

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/clark-charles-manning-225

JM

 


Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers
Post by: Jang on Tuesday 22 August 17 02:05 BST (UK)
Yes, I just logged on again to say it looked like Leichhardt, which makes sense as that is where Mary's sister was living. It seems Edward Elgar was already married at the time (1899 to Minnie Jones). I've just found they had one child, Leonard, born 1902. Edward died 1935, still married.

This ties in with my previous posts: http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=677841.0
and http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=754898.54

I agree that the other comments are most likely on the reverse - they look back to front to me.

That's interesting about C.H. Clark ...

Still hoping to find out one day what became of Enid :-)



Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: Johnf04 on Tuesday 22 August 17 02:49 BST (UK)
Hi there - I've darkened the attachment, to make the faint words easier to read.
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
Post by: Jang on Tuesday 22 August 17 03:13 BST (UK)
Thanks John, I think it's definitely the reverse of the page.

Jan
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
Post by: groom on Tuesday 22 August 17 08:56 BST (UK)
Thanks John, I think it's definitely the reverse of the page.

Jan

Yes, you only have to look at the reversed date at the end. The marks are nothing to do with the Coulson record.
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, 1818-2011"
Post by: Johnf04 on Tuesday 22 August 17 09:06 BST (UK)
I should have also made a mirror image copy, like here:
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers,
Post by: Jang on Tuesday 22 August 17 09:07 BST (UK)
Aha, clever!
Title: Re: Ancestry problem with "Sydney, Australia, Anglican Parish Registers, "
Post by: majm on Tuesday 22 August 17 09:09 BST (UK)
It is of course possible that the 'pencil' comments are NOT pencil comments, but bleed throughs from the other side of the page.    August 4 1869 may well be a bleed through into the 'blank' box in the image I attached.

JM

Yes, I noted the  possible bleed through at reply # 8.  :)

ADD

Good to see confirmation in those additional images, thanks  :)

JM