Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - miss marple

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 7
1
The Common Room / Surname of illegitimate child
« on: Sunday 08 June 08 12:35 BST (UK)  »
Hello all

In the 1920's was it possible to give an illegitimate child a surname other than the mother's if the father was not named?

An example: John Smith is living with, but not married to, Jane Jones, who has been (or still is) married to Mr Jones. John Smith and Jane Jones have a daughter, Susan. On the birth certificate the details are: "child's name - Susan Smith: father's name - left blank: mother's name: Jane Jones formerly Taylor". I believe her mother intended Smith to be Susan's surname, but the register entry reads "Susan S. Jones". When Susan married her name on the certificate was Susan Smith Jones and her father's name was given as John Smith Jones - presumably simply to avoid embarrassment as he was only ever John Smith in real life.

My question is, if the father was not named, was it the law at that time that the child took the mother's surname? Or was it just a misunderstanding on the part of the registrar that led to Susan ending up with Smith as a forename rather than a surname?

Hope someone can enlighten me!


2
The Common Room / German soldiers' records
« on: Sunday 20 January 08 14:00 GMT (UK)  »
Hello all

Among my late father-in-law's effects are three second world war "soldbuchs", or German soldiers' military records. (I have no idea how he came to have these, or what happened to their original owners.) I would love to be able to pass these books on to members of their families if possible, but have no idea how to start looking for them! Does anyone know of a German version of RootsChat, or have any other bright ideas?

Jane

3
Armed Forces / Can anyone read this?
« on: Thursday 17 January 08 20:37 GMT (UK)  »
Hello all

In 1861 my great grandfather enlisted in the regular army while already in the Militia; in his army records is a certificate releasing him from service to the Militia while he continued to be a soldier. The certificate goes on to say that "he has been placed under a stoppage of 1d a day for 18 months from his pay in such service under the provisions of....." and then there's what's presumably a reference to an army regulation, which I can't read properly.

I am assuming the stoppage of pay was as a punishment for enlisting when he was in the Militia, which was not allowed - it would have paid back the £2 bounty he received plus a bit more. But I would love to know exactly what the quoted regulation was. Anyone any idea? I hope I manage to post the relevant picture!

Many thanks for looking!

Jane




4
Armed Forces / What exactly was the Militia? (1860)
« on: Saturday 22 December 07 16:44 GMT (UK)  »
Hello all

My great grandfather enlisted in the Carlow Regiment of Militia in February 1860, then in the 86th Regiment of Foot (under a different name!) in December 1860. There is a note in his military records about this, which says that he has been "placed under a stopppage of 1d a day for 18 months from his pay" under what looks like some army regulation number, and that while he remains a regular soldier he will not be required to serve in the Carlow Militia if it is called for training or embodiment.

I have the feeling that the Militia was more like the Territorial Army is today - you did some training and would be called into service if there was a war, but otherwise you just carried on with your normal job. Is this right? And would the "stoppage of pay" referred to be as a punishment for joining the regular army when he was already a member of the Militia?

Hope somebody will be able to help!


5
The Lighter Side / WDYTYA Sunday Times spoiler
« on: Sunday 30 September 07 14:32 BST (UK)  »
I've just read an article in today's Sunday Times about next Thursday's programme featuring Alastair McGowan. I wish I hadn't, as it's given away what must be most of the programme's findings, including the "surprise" ending! Why is the BBC giving this info to papers without some sort of embargo? It's certainly spoiled next week's programme for me.

Jane

6
World War One / Re-enlisting after discharge
« on: Saturday 08 September 07 11:37 BST (UK)  »
Hello all

One of my great uncles was discharged from the North Staffs regiment a few weeks after enlisting in 1914 because of "flat foot". However, he must have fairly swiftly re-enlisted because he was killed in action in France in June 1915 as a soldier in the Northumberland Fusiliers. I was wondering how common it was for men to enlist again after having been discharged - didn't anyone notice his flat foot the second time, or were they getting so short of men they were just less picky by then? Also, would he have been committing any sort of misdemeanour by enlisting when he knew he had been found unfit before?

Thanks for your help!

Jane

7
The Lighter Side / The longest name?
« on: Thursday 14 June 07 12:50 BST (UK)  »
I've just come across this name while browsing through the births index:

John Conrad A. AE. A. A. C. D. C. A. F. Barr (Mar q. 1901, Paddington 1a 76)

Eleven forenames in all - a football team, perhaps?!

What are the most unwieldy names other rootschatters have come across?

8
The Lighter Side / An unfortunate name...
« on: Friday 04 May 07 16:14 BST (UK)  »
Browsing through the births register I have just come across across a Marion Swan born in 1921 whose mother's maiden name was Pizsoff. I bet that lady was glad to lose her name when she got married.....

9
Gloucestershire / 'Neighbour' as a first name
« on: Monday 26 March 07 12:07 BST (UK)  »
Hello all

One of my family connections has the unusual first name of Neighbour. I have no idea of the origins of this name (biblical, perhaps?) but I have noticed almost all "Neighbours" in the censuses come from Gloucestershire, particularly the Bishop's Cleeve area. Intriguing!  Can anyone explain it?

Jane

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 7