Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Puffin81

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 15
1
Ireland / Re: James or Thomas Keenan 1800
« on: Thursday 21 February 19 19:18 GMT (UK)  »
I obtained it from the register office and didn’t realise they were transcribed.
Was it from GRO?
There is a procedure for pointing out possible errors. You need to provide proof. You would need to ask the local registry office to check which name is on original certificate first.


Yes I’ve failed the procedure as I didn’t raise it within 3 months, when I found the parish records so they said I needed to re purchase then complain if the 2nd certificate was incorrect

2
Ireland / Re: James or Thomas Keenan 1800
« on: Thursday 21 February 19 19:00 GMT (UK)  »
I obtained it from the register office and didn’t realise they were transcribed.

I’ve never found James for sure in the uk as his wife / family unit were without him in 1851 when I’ve first found them.  In 1858 his son Marrys and states his farther died, In 1861 his wife stayed widow.  So I’m guessing he died before 1851, or there is a chance early to mid 1850s but was elsewhere working

3
Ireland / Re: James or Thomas Keenan 1800
« on: Thursday 21 February 19 17:53 GMT (UK)  »
The certificates have started to arrive, although I still havent found the children’s 1st marriages to get their certificates in the hope of finding snippets of info, bi I have got James / thomas wofes death certificate which confirms James was her husbands name

I did beleive from the marriage certificate that James was a soldier, but it doesn’t look like soldier to me on this one, can anyone read it?

4
Travelling People / Re: Recycling names
« on: Saturday 16 February 19 23:57 GMT (UK)  »
I’ve noticed in a lot of my Irish traveler family’s that names are recycled, not just naming after a parent but also, if a child dies another is given the same name, a practice that seems strange today.

Is this something that happened in traveler family’s?  If so was there a reason?

I’ve noticed A lot of janes, johns, James, Margaret and Mary Mary Ann’s too.  I did wonder if the recycled names started off as mary-Ann, Mary-Jane in some cases but then got shortened.

This happened on the European mainland aswell.  It was important to earlier generations that ancestors names were honoured and carried on. Thus, as the first born baby boy would be named after its paternal grandfather, you will realise the significance of any younger baby carrying the name.  Where there are two given names I find that families vary on the one they choose to use every day,  for instance "Mary Ann" might be "Annie".  When Mary Ann is a child on a census you'll probably see "Mary"" then when married in some instances if you can't find a maried Mary - look for Ann/Annie.

I have one set of Welsh parents that named their first daughter Mary.  Mary died and her replacement was Mary Ann, poor little Mary Ann died and the replacement was named Maria Mary Ann.

As for the given names that often appear in your ancestors, you'll notice they are all mostly mentioned in the bible and if you surf you'll find they have a meaning.  As for William, I'm assuming (rightly or wrongly) that it was introduced into a family when William the Conqueror arrived on these shores 1066.

In case you can't locate the usual naming pattern here it is:-

The traditional patterns used when naming boys were as follows:

    The first son would be named after the father's father (variation is after the mother's father especially if he's rich)
    The second after the mother's father (variation is the father's father)
    The third son would be named after the father
    The fourth son would be named after the father's oldest brother (variation is after the father's paternal grandfather)
    The fifth son would be named after the mother's oldest brother (variation is after the mother's paternal grandfather)

and for girls:

    First daughter named after the mother's mother (variation is after the father's mother)
    Second daughter named after the father's mother
    Third daughter named after the mother
    Fourth daughter named after the mother's oldest sister (variation is after the mother's maternal grandmother)
    Fifth daughter named after the father's oldest sister (variation is after the father's maternal grandmother)

Thank you so much that’s really useful and interesting

5
Travelling People / Re: Recycling names
« on: Saturday 16 February 19 22:43 GMT (UK)  »
I’ve noticed in a lot of my Irish traveler family’s that names are recycled, not just naming after a parent but also, if a child dies another is given the same name, a practice that seems strange today.

There have been posts on here before about this.
It was pretty common in the past to 're-use' a name after a child had died for another child.
It was a way of ensuring that that name was carried on. Often it was the name of the father, or grandfather, mother or grandmother, favourite uncle or aunt etc.
It was not necessarily an Irish thing, or even a travellers' thing,
I have families from Scotland and different parts of England who did exactly that.
One family buried 3 daughters all called Katherine - that had been the name of the mother's mother. How sad.

Very sad, I think I’ve mentioned before how all I’ve found was ancestors that had a nice life, bit rich, but happy, but all I’ve found is desperately poor people that rubbish things happened too.  Then I found one couple who looked to live a nice life, they didn’t have much but they looked to have everything going ok for them.  THEN I found articles about him being a drunk and an abuser and going to prison for it, then he turned up in the workhouse living separately to his wife.

I’ve noticed the name thing more with my traveler ancestors, perhaps it’s just that a lot of my branches hit traveller at certain time periods

I’ve definitely noticed a lot of marriages with the same surnames so they definitely stuck together.

6
Travelling People / Recycling names
« on: Saturday 16 February 19 21:11 GMT (UK)  »
I’ve noticed in a lot of my Irish traveler family’s that names are recycled, not just naming after a parent but also, if a child dies another is given the same name, a practice that seems strange today. (And confusing, if I ever have children I’ll consider future geniologists  ;D)

Is this something that happened in traveler family’s?  If so was there a reason?

I’ve noticed A lot of janes, johns, James, Margaret and Mary Mary Ann’s too.  I did wonder if the recycled names started off as mary-Ann, Mary-Jane in some cases but then got shortened. 

7
Cumberland Lookup Requests / Re: Yet another 3 Jane Keenan’s marriage carlisle
« on: Friday 15 February 19 21:17 GMT (UK)  »
Its strange  that there is no birth for Mary no 1 but there's a death registration, makes you wonder if Jane and Mary weren't registered at all, but then if you've checked the original church records it doesn't look as if they were baptised either, unless its was later than the dates you checked.
 If Mary no 1 was Jane's twin, then Jane and James must have had 3 sets of twins as it looks like Robert had a twin brother as well! 
Also in Ladyhawks post regarding the Mary who married James in 1860's, if its the right family - the lodger was called O'Neill - another relative!!!?
If Jane was an O'Neill is it possible that she's Bridget's (Batholomew's wife) sister?
Theres a James Keenhan marries a Jane Keenan in June 1868, could this be Jane Jnr, although she would only be 16 if the 1852 birth is the right one

It’s strange I can’t find the births for the early children, or the marriage.  The family’s definitely seem to interlink, I was wondering if Jane might be Bridget’s sister, but I can’t find Bridget with 100% certainly before she married bartholomew. 

I’ve ordered janes death certificate in the hope it may give us a clue

8
Cumberland Lookup Requests / Re: Yet another 3 Jane Keenan’s marriage carlisle
« on: Friday 15 February 19 18:57 GMT (UK)  »
I find it odd only the haltwhistle kids have baptism records, unless they haven’t been subscribed.

It’s also odd how it looks like there are a fed Keenan’s and O’Neil’s marrying but I can’t find Them.

I’ll revisit this tomorrow, the marriage shouldn’t be this difficult to find, if it exists.

I'm not sure the records for the catholic church in Carlisle are transcribed.  There was only one catholic church in 1850's.  I did a look up for someone for this church at the archives a while ago because they couldn't find them online.

I couldn’t find anything but I think I was looking too early.

It doesn’t help how this family repeats names 🤦‍♀️

9
Cumberland Lookup Requests / Re: Yet another 3 Jane Keenan’s marriage carlisle
« on: Friday 15 February 19 00:45 GMT (UK)  »
I find it odd only the haltwhistle kids have baptism records, unless they haven’t been subscribed.

It’s also odd how it looks like there are a fed Keenan’s and O’Neil’s marrying but I can’t find Them.

I’ll revisit this tomorrow, the marriage shouldn’t be this difficult to find, if it exists.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 15