1
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Pulham Manor court book 1670s - entries in LATIN
« on: Wednesday 26 September 18 19:36 BST (UK) »
Much appreciated - many thanks.
dejay
dejay
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Pulham Manor court book 1670s - entries in LATIN
« on: Tuesday 25 September 18 19:20 BST (UK) »2 documents attached from 1671 and 1672 parts of Pulham Manor Court Book regarding William ARTIS that need English "translation". Documents downloaded from Family Search images - hoping that resolution is acceptable (unfortunately the way the book was filmed means that some lines appear to "run into" the spine)
[NOTE: Unable to find any reference in the 1675 entries - perhaps this was an error made in the 1680 entry(?) ... should have been 1672]
dejay
3
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Sunday 23 September 18 21:04 BST (UK) »
Understand. This is a bit difficult ... the document I copied from the RO in Norwich does not appear in the 1675 section of the court book on FS! I am having trouble matching up the microfiche reference with the equivalent in the FS copy. It must be from a different date - I will try and find it and re-post, as intended.
Thanks again for help to date
Regards
Thanks again for help to date
Regards
4
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Sunday 23 September 18 17:53 BST (UK) »
Got it ... yes. William it is. Ta
I am so grateful for all your help ..... if you can stand it I attach the original 1675 entry .....
I am so grateful for all your help ..... if you can stand it I attach the original 1675 entry .....
5
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Sunday 23 September 18 16:59 BST (UK) »
Well, that is a great find. Had not realised that these were of FS!
Notice list of names under the heading .... these are members of the court I assume(?)
Which "Artis" do you think is listed ..... looks like John to me.
Notice list of names under the heading .... these are members of the court I assume(?)
Which "Artis" do you think is listed ..... looks like John to me.
6
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Saturday 22 September 18 19:02 BST (UK) »
I see. Yes, guess that is right.
Will leave it there. Thanks again for all your help.
Will leave it there. Thanks again for all your help.
7
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Saturday 22 September 18 17:52 BST (UK) »
Bookbox
Unfortunately only have copy of this page and no date appears above. It is "indexed" in date range 1677-1686 so must be shortly after - it is near front of the book.
I attach "side notes" which appear alongside. Other than names is the lower text any guide .... looks like numbering to me (?)
Otherwise, yes, back to NRO I guess.
PS Have found earlier entry - must be the 1675 court entry. I will have to get this resized etc. but will then place as separate post.
Many thanks
Unfortunately only have copy of this page and no date appears above. It is "indexed" in date range 1677-1686 so must be shortly after - it is near front of the book.
I attach "side notes" which appear alongside. Other than names is the lower text any guide .... looks like numbering to me (?)
Otherwise, yes, back to NRO I guess.
PS Have found earlier entry - must be the 1675 court entry. I will have to get this resized etc. but will then place as separate post.
Many thanks
8
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Friday 21 September 18 19:19 BST (UK) »
Thanks.
Just a couple of dating issues:
When it uses the term "now" or "the present court" ..... does this refer, in your view to the 27th October 1675 as stated in the preamble? This was found in the Norfolk Record Office under an Index for 1677-1686. Is that just a technicality?
In Part 1 "on the nineteenth day of July last past" - do I take this to be 1675 or 1674?
Just a couple of dating issues:
When it uses the term "now" or "the present court" ..... does this refer, in your view to the 27th October 1675 as stated in the preamble? This was found in the Norfolk Record Office under an Index for 1677-1686. Is that just a technicality?
In Part 1 "on the nineteenth day of July last past" - do I take this to be 1675 or 1674?
9
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Court book entry 1695 Latin deciphering please
« on: Friday 21 September 18 17:51 BST (UK) »
Bookbox
Amazing. Many thanks.
In the will there is a reference to a property called "Woodstile House" which I assume is this one. Could never work out where it was, so this is a major breakthrough!
Yes, unfortunately seem to have cropped out the last line (2 words) which I have added to this note. If you could just confirm the meaning then I would be most grateful.
cheers
Amazing. Many thanks.
In the will there is a reference to a property called "Woodstile House" which I assume is this one. Could never work out where it was, so this is a major breakthrough!
Yes, unfortunately seem to have cropped out the last line (2 words) which I have added to this note. If you could just confirm the meaning then I would be most grateful.
cheers