Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pigginnut

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 66
1
Suffolk / Re: Lost Arthur Charles Blaza 1894 to 1911
« on: Friday 06 March 20 12:56 GMT (UK)  »
Sorry Folks
I am so grateful for your assistance here, have been away from computer looking after my mother, apologies for delay in replying.

I am so sure we have found the right one and I am very grateful to you all for your help, sometimes a second pair of eyes or 3 or 4 pairs in this case can see what you are missing. Although it was not blocking our research it is so good to have that gap filled on the tree.  The man clearly got about over the years lol.  ;D

2
Suffolk / Re: Lost Arthur Charles Blaza 1894 to 1911
« on: Wednesday 04 March 20 18:59 GMT (UK)  »
JenB  Thanks
why peops had to use middle names and lie about ages lol, did they not think to consider we who want to research lol

3
Suffolk / Re: Lost Arthur Charles Blaza 1894 to 1911
« on: Wednesday 04 March 20 18:44 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Cathy

My gut is telling me that you have found them.  It is tricky as you say ages are a little out and from experience we know facts were not always true on the census.  Places fit roughly, just gotta work out how to prove it.

Lol

4
Suffolk / Re: Lost Arthur Charles Blaza 1894 to 1911
« on: Wednesday 04 March 20 17:22 GMT (UK)  »
Elizabeth was 26 in 1894 and her father was called John but deceased,  so far I have a possible birth in Marlborough

I have also just seen a Charles and Anne Blaza in 1901 living in poplar this has Charles down as being born Norfolk then it is crossed out and Lowestoft added. Anne is down as being born metfield
But the surname looks like Blaya so not sure

actually I have Elizabeth in 1871 with dad John and that says born metfield so there is a good chance it is them in 1901 but using middle names for some reason. No children with them though

5
Suffolk / Re: Lost Arthur Charles Blaza 1894 to 1911
« on: Wednesday 04 March 20 17:11 GMT (UK)  »

Were they born in the period 1894 - 1921, if so can you please give details
[/quote]

no the 2 children I know of were born to second wife 1927 and 1928 both in Kingston upon Hull

I know of no children born to him and Elizabeth as yet

6
Suffolk / Lost Arthur Charles Blaza 1894 to 1911
« on: Wednesday 04 March 20 16:57 GMT (UK)  »
Please could someone help me out here, we are trying to find Arthur Charles Blaza born 1870 Hardley Norfolk.  We know all about his parentage back and have him on all census except 1901 and 1911

Facts I know are that he was born 1870 Hardley Norfolk
He married Elizabeth Mary Anne Barrett or Berrett in Lowestoft Suffolk 8 April 1894

I have nothing more on him till he married again on 19th June 1921 to Emily Morris in Kingston Upon Hull.
we have his children too but he is an enigma between 1894 and 1921
Help would be appreciated as the name is notorious for being spelt wrong.
 ???

7
Glamorganshire Lookup Requests / Re: 1851 and 1861 and 1871 Glamorgan help needed
« on: Saturday 15 February 20 13:10 GMT (UK)  »

[/quote]
Hi,
I just googled this name and this came up. Pigginnut did you do a family tree or something? I’d love to see how you got on with it as my grandmother was John heycock grand daughter ( Elizabeth maud heycock) . I’ve started one an ancestry and I’m getting quite obsessed as the history is so interesting
Are we related or was this for someone else?
[/quote]

Hi There this was a tree I did for someone else, I am afraid I no longer have access to any of the information I did sorry

Teresa

8
Thank you Carol.
You learn something new every day lol

9
Hi again carolew. I did actually find death ref, but that is just adding to my puzzlement about whether they married, i realize people call themselves whatever they want these days but i thought they had to put legal name on legal documents. Clearly I thought wrong.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 66