Author Topic: Anne HEISON m. 1748, Hanmer (Read 15637 times)

Lydart · « **Reply #18 on:** Sunday 28 January 07 20:28 GMT (UK) »

Would that be Zilch Heison or Zilch Heeson ?!

Peterej · « **Reply #19 on:** Sunday 28 January 07 23:41 GMT (UK) »

perhaps a bit of a leap but how about

Ann Elson christened 10 May 1727 in Tarporley (about 20 miles away)

Peter

Gadget · « **Reply #20 on:** Sunday 28 January 07 23:43 GMT (UK) »

That looks interesting, Peter. Thank you

I wonder if the 'l' got written wrongly at Tarporley or she was being posh and said 'Eson'

Have you got any further info please?

Peterej · « **Reply #21 on:** Monday 29 January 07 00:06 GMT (UK) »

just a simple search on LDS. There is also a sibling Thomas with a double L in the surname. Parents William and Margarett. There might of course may other variants on the spelling.

What were the witnesses names?

Goodnight!

Peter

Gadget · « **Reply #22 on:** Monday 29 January 07 00:11 GMT (UK) »

Goodnight Peter !

There must have been a reason why I discounted her - Iwould have done a thorough on the LDS when I first looked for her

I'll check it out - no witness details - records are poor for that time

Gadget

Gadget · « **Reply #23 on:** Monday 29 January 07 00:19 GMT (UK) »

Just looked again. I think the reason is that it was a patron submission. I also note the Ann Easlston, 1727, Poulton le Fylde - I cetainly remember seeing that one - also patron submission.

I wonder if anyone has access to the Tarporley registers?

Gadget

Peterej · « **Reply #24 on:** Monday 29 January 07 09:25 GMT (UK) »

Morning!

to add to the intrigue there were Elson's married and christened in Whitchurch so there might be a family connection to Tarporley.

Peter

Gadget · « **Reply #25 on:** Monday 29 January 07 10:30 GMT (UK) »

Morning Peter

I shall have to have a look at this family. I have to find out if Anne's baptism is in the Tarporley registers, if she survived to 1748 or if she married someone else.

I'm not really sure that it is my Anne but I'll have to check - it's the L that's the stumbling block.

On the Hanmer side - where is the Parish Chest that might have more information in? The records were so sparce.

Regards

Gadget - still looking for Heison

Lydart · « **Reply #26 on:** Monday 29 January 07 15:16 GMT (UK) »

I know I'm talking to someone who is FAR more of an expert than me ... but it occurred to me to ask if you have thought that HEISON and HELSON could look the same if the L was badly written and looked like an I ? And likewise, EISON could look like ESON if the I was small and not dotted ?

Just a thought !

RootsChat.Com