Re: Mary Rowe
This may prove to be utter nonsense but here goes anyway:
I have carried out a search of the 1851 census on Ancestry with a christian name of Mary b1832 in Diddlebury. It has thrown out just one match in terms of date and place of birth and that is for a Mary Dyer, daughter of James Dyer, carpenter, b circa 1798 in Culmington and living in Diddlebury. She is also living with him in the 1841 census.
I have checked the IGI for Diddlebury (and Culmington) and there is no christening record for Mary Dyer. I have also checked for James Dyer marriages in the two parishes and have found nothing.
On the plus side, the date and place of birth are correct and the christian name of the father and his occupation fit with the marriage certificate details. Also, there is no IGI record of Mary Dyer's birth nor of James Dyer's marriage.
On the negative side, the 1841 and 1851 census returns have Mary's name as Dyer and the marriage certificate has the father's surname as Rowe.
Is it beyond the realms of possibility that he was the father and, after the possible mother's death in 1835 (burial 14th January 1835 St Peter Diddlebury Barbara Virgin Rowe aged 26) that he adopted the child and gave her his surname?
Would it ever be provable or only ever a possible scenario?
Thanks