Hi Heywood,
thank you for your interest.
Yes I agree William and Mary would have been young when they had Thomas.
I originally found them while trying to cross check information from a later census (1901) where Thomas and Adelaide are married and have teenage children. Trying to cross check as much info as possible, (to try to eliminate any 'red herrings') I found Thomas, Adelaide and family on the 1891 census- but missing Elizabeth age 5 ?? So searched the 1891 census for Elizabeth Callaghan age 5 and found Elizabeth Callaghan aged 5 with 'grandparents' Mary and William Callaghan - lodging house and shop keepers in Flower and Dean Street, which runs next to Fashion Street in Spitalfields, where Thomas and Adelaide's first child William was born. William's birth certificate is the only original family record my husband has, and was my starting point. (wish my husband had an easier family to trace - like smith perhaps
)
To confirm the relationship for these 'grandparents' I found a record of Thomas and Adelaide's marriage which turned out to be 3 months after their first born arrived, and ordered the certificate - it confirmed the couples details and showed Thomas' father as one William Callaghan - shop keeper! So as far as I can prove this seems to be accurate.
There is one thing about Williams birth certificate that is still bothering me a bit......you have got me started now.......must be all those stars against your username...think you must be a bit of an expert at all this.
My concern is - the original birth certificate of William b.1881 (19th, December at no.19 Fashion St.) is actually a copy obtained by my husbands family seemingly around the time of Williams death in 1939. It shows the mother, Adelaide - as Adelaide CALLAGHAN formerly Edwards, though the parents were not married until 3 months later.
Ist thought was Aaargh! I have the wrong marriage, BUT all the names fit..the locations fit - everthing else about them seems to fit, And search for ages as I did I cannot find another Thomas and Adelaide Callaghan with a suitable date (remembering they too were parents and wed young).
However, back to Williams birth certificate. It has a marginal note! I looked up these notes on the GRO website......it mentions that when a child was born out of wedlock, but both biological parents subsequently marry, they can have the birth registration amended to show the mother with the married name and 'formerly' against the maiden name!!!
Thinking as I write this .....maybe it would be worth ordering the original birth certificate.
Bet you did not expect an essay in reply. I have done a few of these family trees for myself and my husband's father's line, but this one is making me dizzy as is the hardest.
However, thank you for your input.
Kind regards - Angela.