Author Topic: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?  (Read 28211 times)

Offline pinot

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 862
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 19 September 17 00:29 BST (UK) »
Loved the explanation; any similar derivation for 'Nobby' Clark?

Offline PollyAnnasH

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 11:29 GMT (UK) »
Not sure which service man is Tug?

Offline jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,472
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 12:23 GMT (UK) »
Looks very like Royal Artillery c. 1920's but not quite sure about that.
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Offline PollyAnnasH

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 14:37 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Jim1, definitely 1920-1923 era as my nan was born July 1923. So are the men in the image definitely British soldiers? There was rumor that he could have been Canadian.


Offline jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,472
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 15:24 GMT (UK) »
It's possible they're Canadian, their uniforms were almost identical as were many of their cap badges.
I would expect to see collar dogs if they were Canadian but they may not all have worn them.
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Offline tonepad

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 16:14 GMT (UK) »
The soldier sitting has the  "Broken Spur" shoulder insignia of the 74th (Yeomanry) Division.
This division was disbanded on the 10 July 1919.
The photo must have been taken before the birth of your nan in 1923.
Agree the cap badges are Royal Artillery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/74th_(Yeomanry)_Division


Tony
Aucock/Aukett~Kent/Sussex, Broadway~Oxfordshire, Danks~Warwickshire, Fenn~Kent/Norfolk, Goatham~Kent, Hunt~Kent, Parker~Middlesex, Perry~Kent, Sellers~Kent/Yorkshire, Sladden~Kent, Wright~Kent/Essex

Offline PollyAnnasH

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 18:04 GMT (UK) »
@ Tony, thank you so much, a little more to go on.

Offline PollyAnnasH

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 13
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 20:54 GMT (UK) »
So, I really appreciate the help you have provided so far. My mum has just sent me another photograph, which I am guessing are the same service men, just more recent. What can you tell me from this pic?

Offline tonepad

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why were WILSON'S called 'Tug'?
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday 29 October 19 21:35 GMT (UK) »
These are two different men in different units.
By their cap badges:
This time the man sitting is in the Royal Army Medical Corps.
The man standing is perhaps in a Light Infantry Regiment or Rifles Regiment.


Tony
Aucock/Aukett~Kent/Sussex, Broadway~Oxfordshire, Danks~Warwickshire, Fenn~Kent/Norfolk, Goatham~Kent, Hunt~Kent, Parker~Middlesex, Perry~Kent, Sellers~Kent/Yorkshire, Sladden~Kent, Wright~Kent/Essex