Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Marriage License or Banns?  (Read 5650 times)

Offline aggiebagwash

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,633
    • View Profile
Marriage License or Banns?
« on: Tuesday 30 December 08 19:13 GMT (UK) »
I know what the difference is between marrying with a License and marrying after Banns however, does anyone know of any reason why a couple would opt for a License in 1884 rather than Banns?  :-\

Also was a Bond still required then or had that tradition died out by this time?

Margaret

Offline patrish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,816
  • Winter Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage License or Banns?
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 30 December 08 23:12 GMT (UK) »
This link gives information that you require.

http://www.history.ac.uk/gh/marrlic.htm
this information is Crown Copyright. from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk   London Hall, Thurston Stanley, Phillips, Ayrton, White, Morrish, Smith.    West Ham/Barking Saint,Briggs,   Essex  Barker,   Hampshire  Kill, Kent Spong,   U.S.A Earp, Scotland/Cumbria Templeton, Devon Morrish, Chudley

Offline aggiebagwash

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,633
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage License or Banns?
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 30 December 08 23:49 GMT (UK) »
Thank you so much, will read and analyse it now.

Margaret
Pages: [1]