Author Topic: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester  (Read 3214 times)

Offline Al in Vane

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 965
  • I've not edited my PROFILE yet
    • View Profile
1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« on: Thursday 03 March 05 12:28 GMT (UK) »
In 1891 census I am looking for Henry Aaron 69, wife Elizebeth70, and family if still alive.
In 1881 they were at the Crown and Anchor Inn in Hylton Road, Worcester

Any information would be most welcome
                         Al in Vane

Offline JeannieR

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Me with eldest grandson Nick, now 23
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 03 March 05 14:13 GMT (UK) »
Al

I couldn't find this gentleman in 1891.

I have sent you a PM with some other information for you though.

Kind Regards
JeannieR
This information is Crown Copyright, from www.national archives.gov.uk

Offline ec

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 03 March 05 14:38 GMT (UK) »
 This looks like the son, William in 1891

 RG12/2329
Registration district:    Worcester 
Sub registration district:    North Worcester 
ED, institution, or vessel:    19 
Folio:    136 
Civil parish:    South Claines 
Ecclesiastical parish:    St Mary 

Aaron, William J 25 Stourbridge, Staffordshire Head  South Claines  Worcestershire   
Aaron, Annie M 25 Suckley, Worcestershire Wife  South Claines  Worcestershire   
Aaron, Edith A 1/12 Northwick, Worcestershire Daughter  South Claines  Worcestershire   

Offline ec

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 03 March 05 14:40 GMT (UK) »
on checking the image this sister in law was also with them

Phillips, Frances E 23 Suckley, Worcestershire Sister-in-law  South Claines  Worcestershire 


Offline Al in Vane

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 965
  • I've not edited my PROFILE yet
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 03 March 05 14:46 GMT (UK) »
Many Thanks ec, you have hit the nail firmly on the head! The parents were certainly dead by then as I had assumed.
                     Thank you again,
                                                Al

Offline Sisterjane

  • I am sorry but my emails are no longer working
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,915
  • Castle Hill Huddersfield...Im Here..Where are They
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 03 March 05 14:55 GMT (UK) »
Could this be Elizabeth

Deaths
Elizabeth Aaron
Age at death 69
1890
Upton upon severn
Worcs
Vol 6c
-----------
Joe
Kershaw, Longbottom,Parvin
Areas  Huddersfield, Brighouse, Rastrick ,Thirsk, Sand Hutton
Masters in London/Surrey
Cencus information is crown copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Al in Vane

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 965
  • I've not edited my PROFILE yet
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 03 March 05 15:11 GMT (UK) »
Hi Joe,
          That certainly looks like Elizabeth, Many Thanks for that additional information
                                  Al

Offline JeannieR

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Me with eldest grandson Nick, now 23
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #7 on: Friday 04 March 05 10:07 GMT (UK) »
AL

i think I sent you duff information in a PM last night......That William is the wrong one......It looks like the one EC told you about, not the 18
year old.

I have just had a quick look....no one else that could be him (28) in
1901...unless he is mis-transcribed. HAVE to go to work now...will
look again later...

Kind regards
JeannieR
This information is Crown Copyright, from www.national archives.gov.uk

Offline Al in Vane

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 965
  • I've not edited my PROFILE yet
    • View Profile
Re: 1891 Lookup request - Worcester
« Reply #8 on: Friday 04 March 05 12:09 GMT (UK) »
hi Jeannie,
                I think you were right and the age transcribed wrong, it should have been 16. The one that ec mentioned is a different one, ten years older but in the same family group.
                  Thanks for your perseverance
                                  Al