Author Topic: un-named twins - question  (Read 1025 times)

Offline alveleyhistorian

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
un-named twins - question
« on: Thursday 07 January 10 00:01 GMT (UK) »
hi there, i have recently discovered that one of my watkins family - margaret Handley ( maiden name watkins) gave birth to twins in 1920.
margaret and her twins died soon after the birth- registered wolverhampton
the bmd register describes them as  'male unnamed, female unnamed'
my question is this - margaret was buried in alveley churchyard and her name is in the death register - but no mention of the babies burial - what usually happened in these circumstances if children were unnamed and not baptised ?
such a sad story

Offline CaroleW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 71,240
  • Barney 1993-2004
    • View Profile
Re: still born twins - question
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 07 January 10 00:07 GMT (UK) »
Hi

The twins must have been alive when born for their birth to be registered.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Carlin (Ireland & Liverpool) Doughty & Wright (Liverpool) Dick & Park (Scotland & Liverpool)

Offline alveleyhistorian

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
Re: still born twins - question
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 07 January 10 00:38 GMT (UK) »
Hi

The twins must have been alive when born for their birth to be registered.
[/quoteoh

oh gosh.... yes of course i had forgotten how they record these things.
the story as upset me so much, i haven't seen 'the wood for the trees'
- have modified the posting