Part 2
Additionally, here is a list of recorded baptisms I found for Arthur Downing: (all have documented folios)
from familysearch.org – I did a search for any forename (blank) , children of “Arthur” , surname “Downing” , born between 1570-1590 and got the following results :
1. John Downinge, son of Arthur Downinge, bap. 1 Jan 1578 at Saint Bartholomew, Chichester, Sussex
2. Grissell Downing, dau. of Arthure Downing, bap. 12 Jun 1580 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
3. Margaret Downinge, dau. of Arthur Downinge, bap. 10 Jun 1581 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
4. Edmund Downinge, son of Arthure Downinge, bap. 13 Jun 1581 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
5. George Downeinge, son of Arthure Downeinge, bap. 3 May 1584 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
6. Arthure Downinge, son of Arthure Downinge, bap. 20 Apr 1585 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
7. Robert Downeinge, son of Arthure Downeinge, bap. 29 May 1586 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
8. Wingfilde Downeynge, son of Arthure Downeynge, bap. 17 Apr 1587 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
9. Francis Downinge, dau. of Arthure Downinge, bap. 3 Nov 1588 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
10. Ellen Downeinge, dau. of Arthure Downeinge, bap. 2 Nov 1589 at Weasenham All Saints, Norfolk
Lexham is only a little over two miles east of Castle Acre and two miles south of Weasenham.
The notable exception to the above list is John, the eldest, baptized in Sussex in 1578.
Was John the son of the same Arthur, or were these two different families ?
Perhaps Arthur (and Susan) were away from home on military campaign or for some other reason.
Could this 'John', baptized in Sussex, have followed his family to Suffolk at some point, then found himself in Ireland by 1601 ?
On the surface, it appears that Arthur (Arthure) Downing (Downinge, Downeinge, Downeynge), who had 9 children baptized at Weasenham, would have been Arthur of Lexham.
However, we have yet to find any documented baptisms near Lexham, for Arthur's children (John, Calibutt, Dorothy, Anne, and Susan) as given by The Visitations of Norfolk.
Could there have been two Arthur Downings who frequented locations only 2 miles apart in the same time frame ?
In any case, I wanted to bring to light a few 'John' Downings as potential members of our Downing branch.
Maybe one of these 'Johns' migrated to Ireland by 1601 and could have been the great grandfather of Adam ?
I was aware of a George Downinge (Householder) listed on the Rent Roll for Londonderry, taken 15th May 1628.
from: Ellis MS 42. Published in facsimile with introduction by R. G. S. King, then dean of Derry, as "A particular of the howses and famylyes in London Derry, May 15, 1628"
http://www.ulsterancestry.com/ua-free-Rent_Roll_of_Derry.htmlCould he be the son of Maj. John and in his early twenties in 1628 ?
I see there is a village 'Ballykelly' on the A2 just east of Londonderry which has an intersection with Walworth Road leading north off Main Street (A2),
so I'm sure that is the place you mention and it is close enough to the city to weigh on the probability that George the younger, could have migrated to Londonderry
from his father's homestead.
As for the timeline, if we assume an average generational split of 25 years and John was b. abt. 1581, we could estimate George the elder was b. abt. 1606, and
George the younger abt. 1631, give or take a few years. Assuming Adam's birth year of 1666 is correct (he is described as having died in his "53rd year" on the Downing vault in Bellaghy),
George the younger would have been about 35 years old at Adam's birth. Adam's youngest sister wasn't born until 1678 (according to the 1901 Downing book),
so that might suggest George the younger was born a little later.
If we speculate that George the younger was Adam's father, and he did marry Jane Montgomery:
• it is likely one of Adam's grandsons was named in honor of Col. Clotworthy Skeffington, under whom Adam served during the Siege of Derry and/or The Battle of the Boyne.
• We must also note that Adam had younger brothers named John and George, and he named two of his own sons John and George, but there were no descendants named 'Hugh' (that we know of).
All comments are welcome and any additional information could be a major breakthrough.
Even a seemingly insignificant detail might be the key that unlocks a huge mystery.
Forward Into the Past,
Rick Turner